Tribology Letters

, 66:48 | Cite as

Decomposition Mechanisms of Anti-wear Lubricant Additive Tricresyl Phosphate on Iron Surfaces Using DFT and Atomistic Thermodynamic Studies

  • Eric Osei-Agyemang
  • Stephen Berkebile
  • Ashlie Martini
Original Paper

Abstract

Tricresyl Phosphate (TCP) is widely used as an anti-wear additive for lubrication and hydraulic fluid technology in aerospace propulsion systems. However, there is no clear description of the chemistry involved in the conversion of TCP to an anti-wear film on metal surfaces. Different reaction mechanisms leading to different product formation have been described in the literature, but no attempts have been made to explain the interfacial chemistry using first principles theoretical methods. In this study, we employed density functional theory with atomistic thermodynamic modeling to study the decomposition mechanisms of TCP on an iron (110) surface. We considered three broad reaction schemes, namely TCP as phosphoric acid reservoir, thermal decomposition of TCP, and TCP decomposition by hydrolysis. Different reaction paths were considered for the three reaction schemes, and the resulting decomposition products were characterized by the change in reaction energy, density of state plots, Bader charge analysis, and work functions. We observed that all three reaction schemes had at least one pathway with decreasing reaction energy, indicating they are likely to proceed in the proposed reaction direction. In the presence of hydrogen, TCP decomposition proceeded through the phosphoric acid reservoir mechanism with the anti-wear film comprised of a phosphate group, an m-tolyl group and 1-methyl-2,5-cyclohexadiene. In the presence of moisture, TCP decomposed through hydrolysis leading to a film comprised of a phosphate group and 3-methyl-2,5-cyclohexadienol. However, in the absence of hydrogen and moisture, film formation proceeded through thermal decomposition, and the resulting film was comprised of a methylphenoxy group, a P=O group, and 3-methyl-3,5-cyclohexadienone. Several of the products formed in the calculations, such as a phosphate group, methylphenoxy group, P=O groups, and di-cresyl phosphate, have been observed experimentally in previous research, but we also observed new products, including 3-methyl-2,5-cyclohexadienol and 1-methyl-2,5-cyclohexadiene.

Keyword

Anti-wear additives Additive interaction Additive decomposition Aviation Phosphate esters Iron 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Numerical results presented in this paper were carried out using the regional computational cluster supported by Université Lille 1, CPER Nord-Pas-de-Calais/FEDER, France Grille, and CNRS. We highly appreciate and thank the technical staff of the CRI-Lille 1 center for their helpful support. This research was sponsored by the Army Research Laboratory and was accomplished under Cooperative Agreement Number W911NF-16-2-0121. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the Army Research Laboratory or the US Government. The US Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation herein.

References

  1. 1.
    Farng, L.O.: Ashless antiwear and extreme-pressure additives. In: Rudnick, L.R. (ed.) Lubricant Additives: Chemistry and Application. pp. 223–257. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Phillips, W.D.: Ashless phosphorus-containing lubricating oil additives. In: Rudnick, L.R. (ed.) Lubricant Additives: Chemistry and Application, pp. 45–111. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Snyder, C.E., Gschwender, L.J., Sharma, S.K.: Long-term additive trends in aerospace applications. In: Rudnick, L.R. (ed.) Lubricant Additives: Chemistry and Application, pp. 587–597. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sung, D., Gellman, A.J.: The surface chemistry of alkyl and arylphosphate vapor phase lubricants on Fe foil. Tribol. Int. 35, 579–590 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-679X(02)00045-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pavelko, G.F.: The mechanism of iron phosphide formation during boundary friction in the presence of organic phosphates and phosphites. J. Frict. Wear 33, 115–123 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068366612020092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Graham, E.E., Klaus, E.E.: Lubrication from the vapor phase at high temperatures. ASLE Trans. 29, 229–234 (1986).  https://doi.org/10.1080/05698198608981682 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beeck, O., Givens, J.W., Williams, E.C.: On the mechanism of boundary lubrication. II. Wear prevention by addition agents. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 177, 103–118 (1940).  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1940.0113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gauthier, A., Montes, H., Georges, J.M.: Boundary lubrication with tricresylphosphate (TCP). Importance of corrosive wear. ASLE Trans. 25, 445–455 (1982).  https://doi.org/10.1080/05698198208983112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Placek, D.G., Shankwalkar, S.G.: Phosphate ester surface treatment for reduced wear and corrosion protection. Wear 173, 207–217 (1994).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(94)90274-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Klaus, E.E., Perez, J.M.: Comparative Evaluation of Several Hydraulic Fluids in Operational Equipment, a Full-Scale Pump Test Stand, and the Four-Ball Wear Tester. SAE International, Warrendale (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Klaus, E.E., Duda, J.L., Chao, K.K.: A study of wear chemistry using a micro sample four-ball wear test. Tribol. Trans. 34, 426–432 (1991).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10402009108982053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johnson, D.W., Hils, J.E.: Phosphate esters, thiophosphate esters and metal thiophosphates as lubricant additives. Lubricants 1, 132–148 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants1040132 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saba, C.S., Forster, N.H.: Reactions of aromatic phosphate esters with metals and their oxides. Tribol. Lett. 12, 135–146 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014081523491 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Johnson, D.W., Morrow, S., Forster, N.H., Saba, C.S.: Vapor-phase lubrication: reaction of phosphate ester vapors with iron and steel. Chem. Mater. 14, 3767–3775 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1021/cm010921o CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mandakovic, R.: Assessment of EP additives for water-miscible metalworking fluids. J. Synth. Lubr. 16, 13–26 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1002/jsl.3000160103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wheeler, D.R., Faut, O.D.: The adsorption and thermal decomposition of tricresylphosphate (TCP) on iron and gold. Appl. Surf. Sci. 18, 106–122 (1984).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5963(84)90040-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Abdelmaksoud, M., Bender, J.W., Krim, J.: Nanotribology of a vapor-phase lubricant: a quartz crystal microbalance study of tricresylphosphate (TCP) uptake on iron and chromium. Tribol. Lett. 13, 179–186 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020155925183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guan, B., Pochopien, B.A., Wright, D.S.: The chemistry, mechanism and function of tricresyl phosphate (TCP) as an anti-wear lubricant additive. Lubr. Sci. 28, 257–265 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1002/ls.1327 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Godfrey, D.: The lubrication mechanism of tricresyl phosphate on steel. ASLE Trans. 8, 1–11 (1965).  https://doi.org/10.1080/05698196508972073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bieber, H.E., Klaus, E.E., Tewksbury, E.J.: A study of tricresyl phosphate as an additive for boundary lubrication. ASLE Trans. 11, 155–161 (1968).  https://doi.org/10.1080/05698196808972218 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Goldblatt, I.L., Appeldoorn, J.K.: The antiwear behavior of TCP in different atmospheres and different base stocks. ASLE Trans. 13, 203–214 (1970).  https://doi.org/10.1080/05698197008972296 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Makki, J.F., Graham, E.E.: Vapor phase deposition on high temperature surfaces. Tribol. Trans. 33, 595–603 (1990).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10402009008981994 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Faut, O.D., Wheeler, D.R.: On the mechanism of lubrication by tricresylphosphate (TCP)—the coefficient of friction as a function of temperature for TCP on M-50 steel. ASLE Trans. 26, 344–350 (1983).  https://doi.org/10.1080/05698198308981512 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kresse, G., Hafner, J.: Ab initio. Phys. Rev. B 47, 558–561 (1993).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kresse, G., Hafner, J.: Ab initio. Phys. Rev. B. 49, 14251–14269 (1994).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kresse, G., Furthmüller, J.: Efficiency of ab initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kresse, G., Furthmüller, J.: Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kresse, G., Joubert, D.: From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 59, 1758–1775 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Perdew, J.P., Burke, K., Ernzerhof, M.: Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Methfessel, M., Paxton, A.T.: High-precision sampling for Brillouin-zone integration in metals. Phys. Rev. B. 40, 3616–3621 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Monkhorst, H.J., Pack, J.D.: Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B. 13, 5188–5192 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S., Krieg, H.: A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3382344 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lubricating Oil, Helicopter Transmission System, Synthetic Base (2004) DOD-PRF-85734AGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lubricating Oil, Aircraft Turbine Engine, Synthetic Base, NATO Code Numbers: O-152, O-154, O-156, AND O-167 (2014) MIL-PRF-23699GGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wulff, G.: Zur Frage der Geschwindigkeit des Wachstums und der Auflösung von Krystallflächen. Z. Kristallogr. 34, 449–530 (1901)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Le Page, Y., Saxe, P.: Symmetry-general least-squares extraction of elastic data for strained materials from ab initio calculations of stress. Phys. Rev. B 65, 104104 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Davey, W.P.: Precision measurements of the lattice constants of twelve common metals. Phys. Rev. 25, 753–761 (1925).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.25.753 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Błoński, P., Kiejna, A.: Structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of bcc iron surfaces. Surf. Sci. 601, 123–133 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2006.09.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Psiachos, D., Hammerschmidt, T., Drautz, R.: Ab initio study of the modification of elastic properties of alpha-iron by hydrostatic strain and by hydrogen interstitials. Acta Mater. 59, 4255–4263 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.03.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dragoni, D., Ceresoli, D., Marzari, N.: Thermoelastic properties of α-iron from first-principles. Phys. Rev. B. 91, 104105 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.104105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rayne, J.A., Chandrasekhar, B.S.: Elastic constants of iron from 4.2 to 300oK. Phys. Rev. 122, 1714–1716 (1961).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.122.1714 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Adams, J.J., Agosta, D.S., Leisure, R.G.: Elastic constants of monocrystal iron from 3 to 500 K. J. Appl. Phys. 100, 113530 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2365714 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wilburn, D.R., Bassett, W.: Hydrostatic compression of iron and related compounds: an overview. Am. Miner. 63, 591 (1978)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wu, R., Freeman, A.J.: Structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of an open surface: Fe(111). Phys. Rev. B 47, 3904–3910 (1993).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.47.3904 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hall, G.K., Mee, C.H.B.: The work functions of α-iron, α-cobalt, and α-manganese. Phys. Status Solidi A 5, 389–395 (1971).  https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.2210050213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sheasby, J.S., Caughlin, T.A., Mackwood, W.A.: The effect of steel hardness on the performance of antiwear additives. Wear 201, 209–216 (1996).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(96)07242-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hanyaloglu, B., Graham, E.E.: Effect of surface condition on the formation of solid lubricating films at high temperatures. Tribol. Trans. 35, 77–82 (1992).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10402009208982092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Barcroft, F.T.: A technique for investigating reactions between E.P. additives and metal surfaces at high temperatures. Wear 3, 440–453 (1960).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(60)90228-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Klaus, E.E., Bieber, H.E.: Effect of some physical and chemical properties of lubricants on boundary lubrication. ASLE Trans. 7, 1–10 (1964).  https://doi.org/10.1080/05698196408972030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Moudler, J.F., Stickle, W.F., Sobol, P.E., Bomben, K.D.: Handbook of X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. Perkin-Elmer, Eden Prairie (1992)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Bhargava, G., Gouzman, I., Chun, C.M., Ramanarayanan, T.A., Bernasek, S.L.: Characterization of the “native” surface thin film on pure polycrystalline iron: a high resolution XPS and TEM study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 253, 4322–4329 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.09.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Mangolini, F., Rossi, A., Spencer, N.D.: Chemical reactivity of triphenyl phosphorothionate (TPPT) with iron: an ATR/FT-IR and XPS investigation. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 1339–1354 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp107617d CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of California MercedMercedUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Army Research LaboratoryAberdeen Proving GroundUSA

Personalised recommendations