Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Surface Roughening on Asperity Flattening

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Tribology Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A series of experiments have been conducted using aluminum strips, which manifest a strong tendency toward roughening in forming processes, to investigate the evolvement of surface roughness and its resistance to flattening. The strips are stretched to specific bulk strains and are then compressed by a smooth glass at various pressures. It is found that except for very high bulk strain, the free surface on the transverse specimen roughens more seriously and irregularly than the longitudinal one due to the fierce rotations of grains, which make the grains parallel to the straining direction and eventually mutate the topography into an isotropic one. As the roughened surface is compressed, the transverse specimen may roughen further in the case of large bulk strain. According to the finite element method (FEM) analysis using serrated surfaces, the sharper asperity undergoes more serious straining on its peak and basically such a strain increment is not affected by the degree of flattening. The ability to resist flattening, defined as the “asperity hardness,” varies with asperity angle as well as the enhanced shear strength on the asperity tip, rather than the substrate. A new quantitative description of the asperity hardness is suggested, and the new calculated contact area ratios are in good agreement with the experiments except for very high pressure where additional mechanics such as adiabatic recrystallization might happen. The concept of the additional hardening on asperity peaks can be employed to refine the prediction of asperity contact in the analysis of metal forming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greenwood, J.A., Williamson, J.B.P.: Contact of nominally flat surface. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci. 295, 300–319 (1966). doi:10.1098/rspa.1966.0242

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chang, W.R., Etsion, I., Bogy, D.B.: An elastic–plastic model for the contact of rough surfaces. ASME J. Tribol. 109, 257–263 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Halling, J.I., Nuri, K.A.: The elastic–plastic contact of rough surfaces and its relevance in study of Wear. Proc. Insm. Mech. Engrs. 202(C4), 269–274 (1988). doi:10.1243/PIME_PROC_1988_202_119_02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. So, H., Liu, D.C.: An elastic–plastic model for the contact of anisotropic rough surface. Wear 146, 201–218 (1991). doi:10.1016/0043-1648(91)90063-Z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Majumdar, A., Bhushan, B.: Fractal model of elastic–plastic contact between rough surfaces. ASME J. Tribol. 113, 1–11 (1991). doi:10.1115/1.2920588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Majumdar, A., Bhushan, B.: Elastic–plastic contact model for bifractal surfaces. Wear 153, 53–64 (1992). doi:10.1016/0043-1648(92)90260-F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ju, Y., Zheng, L.: A full numerical solution for the elastic contact of three-dimensional real rough surfaces. Wear 157, 151–161 (1992). doi:10.1016/0043-1648(92)90193-C

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Horng, J.H.: An elliptic elastic–plastic asperity microcontact model for rough surfaces. ASME J. Tribol. 120(1), 82–88 (1998). doi:10.1115/1.2834194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilson, W.R.D., Sheu, S.: Real area of contact and boundary friction in metal forming. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 30(7), 475–489 (1988). doi:10.1016/0020-7403(88)90002-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sutcliffe, M.P.F.: Surface asperity deformation in metal forming processes. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 30(11), 847–868 (1988). doi:10.1016/0020-7403(88)90010-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Korzekwa, D.A., Dawson, P.R., Wilson, W.R.D.: Surface asperity deformation during sheet forming. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 34(7), 521–539 (1992). doi:10.1016/0020-7403(92)90028-F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Saha, P.K., Shih, H.-C., Wilson, W.R.D.: Modeling the influence of plastic strain on boundary friction in sheet metal forming. NAMRI Trans. (SME), 173–180 (1996)

  13. Wilson, W.R.D., Lee, W.: Mechanics of surface roughening in metal forming processes. ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 123(2), 279–283 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lo, S.W., Horng, T.C.: Surface roughening and contact behavior in forming of aluminum sheet. ASME J. Tribol. 121(2), 224–233 (1999). doi:10.1115/1.2833925

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lo, S.W., Tsai, S.D.: Real-time observation of the evolution of contact area under boundary lubrication in sliding contact. ASME J. Tribol. 124(2), 229–238 (2002). doi:10.1115/1.1387027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lo, S.W., Zhou, B.Q., Fang, C.F., Lu, Y.S.: In situ observation of microwedge effect on liquid lubrication. ASME J. Tribol. 126(4), 690–696 (2004). doi:10.1115/1.1759338

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the National Yunlin University of Science and Technology for the use of its facilities. The support from the National Science Council under grants NSC97-2221-E-002-258 and NSC95-2212-E-224-078-MY3 is also gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sy-Wei Lo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lo, SW., Yang, TC., Shih, ZM. et al. Effects of Surface Roughening on Asperity Flattening. Tribol Lett 35, 67–75 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-009-9434-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-009-9434-6

Keywords

Navigation