Skip to main content
Log in

A Refined Friction Modeling for Lubricated Metal Forming Process

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Tribology Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In spite of the existence of a well-developed realistic friction model, it has only been applied to the simple geometric problems, such as the axisymmetric and plane strain conditions, where the formulations of lubricant transport can be decomposed into two characteristic equations. Accordingly, a unified procedure of combining the current lubrication/friction model and finite element code of metal forming has been developed in this article for either steady or unsteady three-dimensional process including both axisymmetric and plane strain cases. In the part of the lubrication analysis, a finite element method is derived for the average Reynolds equation that is appropriated for 3-D metal forming process, and regardless of whether the tooling/workpiece surfaces are in contact or not. With regard to the theory of asperity contact, in addition to the well-known smoothing and roughening effects, significant deformation of asperities could be caused by the elastic microwedges on the tool surface. The availability of the new friction model was proved by a published problem and an axisymmetric stretch forming process was therefore adopted as a benchmark. Numerical results showed that the present analysis provides a good agreement with the measured strain distributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

contact area ratio (fractional contact area)

A :

increasing rate of contact area ratio; dA/dt

A I :

component of ∂A induced by indentation effect

A M :

component of ∂A induced by microwedge effect

A R :

component of ∂A induced by roughening effect

B :

geometric matrix

C :

coefficient of microwedge model

C R :

coefficient of surface roughening model

dA 0 :

differential undeformed area

D :

material matrix

E t :

tangent modulus

E w :

Young’s modulus of workpiece

E I :

nondimensional strain rate of indentation mode

f 1,f 2 :

functions of contact area ratio

f h,f v :

force components per unit undeformed sheet area in the horizontal and vertical directions

\(\mathop F\limits^{\bullet}\) :

nodal force rate

h :

the nominal surface separation

h t :

average film thickness (average surface separation)

h 10 :

the initial film thickness

\(\dot{h}_{\rm t}\) :

squeezing of film thickness, ∂h t/∂t

H t :

nondimensional average film thickness (nondimensional average surface separation), h t /R q

k :

shear strength of workpiece

K :

strength coefficient of workpiece

m :

index in microwedge model

n :

strain hardening exponent

N :

the shape function

p p :

pressure on asperity peak

p v :

lubricant pressure in the valley

\(\bar{p}\) :

mean pressure

Δp :

pressure difference, p pp v

ΔP :

nondimensional effective hardness, (p pp v)/k

\(\bar{p}\) :

nondimensional mean pressure, \(\bar{p}/k\)

P v :

the nondimensional lubricant pressure

Q :

outward flows

R :

anisotropy parameter

R q :

R.M.S. of surface roughness

s :

sliding distance

S :

nondimensional sliding distance, s/S m

S m :

mean asperity spacing

S p :

the fluidity matrix corresponding to pressure variation of lubricant film

S U :

the fluidity matrix corresponding to film entrainment of lubricant

S V :

the fluidity matrix corresponding to surface sliding of lubricant film

\( S^{{\mathop h\limits^{\bullet}} _{\rm t}}\) :

the fluidity matrix corresponding to the squeezing action of lubricant film

S * :

the nondimensional velocity

t :

time

t s :

thickness of workpiece

\(\hat{t}\) :

the nondimensional time,

U :

the average surface speed (the vector form)

\(\hat{\user2{U}}\) :

the nondimensional average lubricant velocity, and

\({\mathop U\limits^{\bullet}} _{\rm n}\) :

nodal velocity vector

V :

the relative velocity of surfaces (the vector form)

\(\hat{\user2{V}}\) :

the nondimensional relative sliding velocity

η:

the viscosity of lubricant

ξ:

initial distance from mid-surface

Φ p :

the pressure flow factor

Φ S :

the shear flow factor

\(\varepsilon\) :

effective strain of workpiece

\(\varepsilon_{1}\) ,\(\varepsilon_{2}\) :

principal logarithmic strains in the radial and circumferential directions

\(\dot {\varepsilon }\) :

bulk strain rate of workpiece

τ12 :

radial and circumferential components of Kirchhoff stress

τa :

adhesion friction stress

τe :

effective stress

τf :

friction stress

τh :

hydrodynamic friction stress

τp :

plowing friction stress

τy :

yield stress

υ:

poisson’s ratio

References

  1. Patir, N., Cheng, H.S.: An average flow model for determining effects of three-dimensional roughness on partial hydrodynamic lubrication. ASME J. Lub. Tech. 10l, 220–230 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wilson, W.R.D., Wang, J.J.: Hydrodynamic lubrication in simple stretch forming processes. ASME J. Trib. 106, 70–77 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sun, D.C., Chen, K.K., Nine, H.D.: Hydrodynamic lubrication in hemispherical punch stretch forming-modified theory and experimental validation. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 29, 761–776 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson, W.R.D., Hector, L.G.: Hydrodynamic lubrication in axisymmetric stretch forming—part 1: theoretical analysis. ASME J. Trib. 113, 659–666 (1991)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hsu, T.C., Wilson, W.R.D.: Refined models for hydrodynamic lubrication in axisymmetric stretch forming. ASME J. Trib. 116, 101–109 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sa, C.Y., Wilson, W.R.D.: Full film lubrication of strip rolling. ASME J. Trib. 116, 569–576 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, T.S.: Full film lubrication of deep drawing. Trib. Inter. 32, 89–96 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang, T.S., Lo, S.W.: A finite element analysis of full film lubricated metal forming process. Trib. Inter. 37, 591–598 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lo, S.W.: A study on flow phenomena in mixed lubrication regime by porous medium model. ASME J. Trib. 37, 225–239 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson, W.R.D., Marsault, N.: Partial hydrodynamic lubrication with large fractional contact areas. ASME J. Trib. 120, 16–20 (1998)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Majumdar, A., Bhushan, B.: Fractal model of elastic–plastic contact between rough surfaces. ASME J. Trib. 113, 1–11 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ju, Y., Zheng, L.: A full numerical solution for the elastic contact of three-dimensional real rough surfaces. Wear 157, 151–161 (1992)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Horng, J.H.: An elliptic elastic–plastic asperity microcontact model for rough surfaces. ASME J. Trib. 120, 82–88 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wilson, W.R.D., Sheu, S.: Real area of contact and boundary friction in metal forming. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 30, 475–489 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sutcliffe, M.P.F.: Flattening of random rough surfaces in metal-forming processes. ASME J. Trib. 121, 433–440 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lo, S.W., Tsai, S.D.: Real-time observation of the evolution of contact area under boundary lubrication in sliding contact. ASME J. Trib. 123, 229–238 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lo, S.W., Yang, T.S.: A new mechanism of asperity flattening in sliding contact—the role of elastic tool microwedge. ASME J. Trib. 125, 713–719 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tong, W., Hector, L.G., Weiland, H., Wieserman, L.F.: In-situ surface characterization of a binary aluminum alloy during tensile deformation. Scripta Mater. 36, 1339–1344 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, W.: Surface roughening in metal forming processes. Ph.D. Thesis, Northwestern University (1996)

  20. Lo, S.W., Horng, T.C.: Surface roughening and contact behavior in forming of aluminum sheet. ASME J. Trib. 121, 224–233 (1999)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Saha, P.K., Wilson, W.R.D.: Influence of plastic strain on friction in sheet metal forming. Wear 172, 167–173 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Saha, P.K., Shih, H.C., Wilson, W.R.D.: Modeling the influence of plastic strain on boundary friction in sheet metal forming. NAMRI Trans. 24, 173–180 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lo, S.Y., Yang, T.S.: A microwedge model of sliding contact in boundary/mixed lubrication. Wear 261, 1163–1173 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilson, W.R.D., Hsu, T.C., Huang, X.B.: A realistic friction model for computer simulation of sheet metal forming process. ASME J. Eng. Indus. 117, 202–207 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hsu, T.C., Lee, C.H.: Realistic friction modeling for simple upsetting. STLE Trib. Trans. 40, 367–473 (1997)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hsu, T.C., Lee, C.H.: Refined fiction modeling for simple upsetting. ASME J. Manu. Sci. Eng. 119, 563–570 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yang, T.S., Hsu, T.C.: Forming limit analysis of hemispherical punch stretching forming. J. Mate. Proc. Tech. 117, 32–36 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang, T.S., Lo, S.W.: Contact simulation for predicting surface topography in metal forming. Trib. Lett. 23, 121–129 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank National Formosa University for the use of their facilities. The support from the National Science Council under grants NSC-93-2212-E-150-031 is also gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tung-Sheng Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, TS. A Refined Friction Modeling for Lubricated Metal Forming Process. Tribol Lett 27, 289–300 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-007-9233-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-007-9233-x

Keywords

Navigation