Genome editing using CRISPR/Cas9 has been highlighted as a powerful tool for crop improvement. Nevertheless, its efficiency can be improved, especially for crops with a complex genome, such as soybean. In this work, using the CRISPR/Cas9 technology we evaluated two CRISPR systems, a one-component vs. a two-component strategy. In a simplified system, the single transcriptional unit (STU), SpCas9 and sgRNA are driven by only one promoter, and in the conventional system, the two-component transcriptional unit (TCTU), SpCas9, is under the control of a pol II promoter and the sgRNAs are under the control of a pol III promoter. A multiplex system with three targets was designed targeting two different genes, GmIPK1 and GmIPK2, coding for enzymes from the phytic acid synthesis pathway. Both systems were tested using the hairy root soybean methodology. Results showed gene-specific edition. For the GmIPK1 gene, edition was observed in both configurations, with a deletion of 1 to 749 base pairs; however, the TCTU showed higher indel frequencies. For GmIPK2 major exclusions were observed in both systems, but the editing efficiency was low for STU. Both systems (STU or TCTU) have been shown to be capable of promoting effective gene editing in soybean. The TCTU configuration proved to be preferable, since it was more efficient. The STU system was less efficient, but the size of the CRISPR/Cas cassette was smaller.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Availability of data and materials
All raw data using in this manuscript will be made available upon request.
Adli M (2018) The CRISPR tool kit for genome editing and beyond. Nat Commun 9:1911
Ahmar S, Gill RA, Jung KH, Faheem A, Qasim MU, et al. (2020). Conventional and molecular techniques from simple breeding to speed breeding in crop plants: recent advances and future outlook. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 21(7):2590
An G, Watson BD, Stachel S, Gordon MP, Nester EW (1985) New cloning vehicles for transformation of higher plants. EMBO J 4:277–284
Bao A, Chen H, Chen L, Chen S, Hao Q et al (2019) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis of GmSPL9 genes alters plant architecture in soybean. BMC Plant Biol 19(1):131
Barrangou R (2015) Diversity of CRISPR-Cas immune systems and molecular machines. Genome Biol 16:247
Cai Y, Chen L, Sun S, Wu C, Yao W, et al. (2018) CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated deletion of large genomic fragments in soybean. Int J Mol Sci 19.
Cermak T, Curtin SJ, Gil-Humanes J, Cegan R, Kono TJY et al (2017) A multipurpose toolkit to enable advanced genome engineering in plants. Plant Cell 29:1196–1217
Cheng Q, Dong L, Su T, Li T, Gan Z et al (2019) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis of GmLHY genes alters plant height and internode length in soybean. BMC Plant Biol 19:562
Chiera JM, Bouchard RA, Dorsey SL, Park EH, Buenrostro-Nava MT, Ling PP, Finer JJ (2007) Isolation of two highly active soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) promoters and their characterization using a new automated image collection and analysis system. Plant Cell Rep 26:1501–1509
Chilcoat D, Liu Z-B, Sander J (2017) Use of CRISPR/Cas9 for Crop Improvement in Maize and Soybean. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 149:27–46
Chiu W-L, Niwa Y, Zeng W, Hirano T, Kobayashi H, Sheen J (1996) Engineered GFP as a vital reporter in plants. Curr Biol 6:325–330
Dang Y, Jia G, Choi J, Ma H, Anaya E et al (2015) Optimizing sgRNA structure to improve CRISPR-Cas9 knockout efficiency. Genome Biol 16:280
Davies JP, Kumar S, Sastry-Dent L (2017) Use of Zinc-Finger Nucleases for Crop Improvement. Progress in Molecular Biology and Transl Sci 149:47–63
Doench JG, Hartenian E, Graham DB, Tothova Z, Hegde M et al (2014) Rational design of highly active sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene inactivation. Nat Biotechnol 32:1262–1267
Doench JG, Fusi N, Sullender M, Hegde M, Vaimberg EW, Donovan KF, Root DE (2016) Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9. Nat Biotechnol 34(2):184–191
Du H, Zeng X, Zhao M, Cui X, Wang Q et al (2016) Efficient targeted mutagenesis in soybean by TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9. J Biotechnol 217:90–97
Fiaz S, Ahmad S, Riaz A, Noor MA, Wang X et al (2019) Applications of the CRISPR/Cas9 System for Rice Grain Quality Improvement: Perspectives and Opportunities. Int J Mol Sci 20(4):888
Gaj T, Gersbach CA, Barbas CF 3rd (2013) ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol 31:397–405
Gao Y, Zhang Y, Zhang D, Dai X, Estelle M, Zhao Y (2015) Auxin binding protein 1 (ABP1) is not required for either auxin signaling or Arabidopsis development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(7):2275–2280
Gao C (2018) The future of CRISPR technologies in agriculture. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 19:275–276
Goodstein DM, Shu S, Howson R, Neupane R, Hayes RD, et al. (2012). Phytozome: a comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic acids research, 40(Database issue), D1178–D1186.
Hsu PD, Scott DA, Weinstein J, Ran FA, Konermann S et al (2013) DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 31(9):827–832
Jacobs TB, LaFayette PR, Schmitz RJ, Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPR/Cas9. BMC Biotechnol 15:16
Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA et al (2012) A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337:816–821
Kim GB, Nam YW (2013) Isolation and characterization of Medicago truncatula U6 promoters for the construction of small hairpin RNA-mediated gene silencing vectors. Plant Mol Biol Report 31(3):581–593
Lee CM, Zhu H, Davis TH, Deshmukh H (2017) Bao G (2017) Design and Validation of CRISPR/Cas9 Systems for Targeted Gene Modification in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Methods Mol Biol 1498:3–21
Luttgeharm KD, Wong K-S, Siembieda S (2017) Heteroduplex cleavage assay for screening of probable zygosities resulting from CRISPR mutations in diploid single cell lines. Biotechniques 62:268–274
Ma X, Zhang Q, Zhu Q, Liu W, Chen Y, Qiu R, Wang B et al (2015) A robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants. Mol Plant 8:1274–1284
Mali P, Yang LH, Esvelt KM, Aach J, Guell M, DiCarlo JE et al (2013) RNA-Guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339(6121):823–826
Marathe A, Krishnan V, Mahajan MM, Thimmegowda V, Dahuja A, et al, (2018). A. Characterization and molecular modeling of Inositol 1,3,4 tris phosphate 5/6 kinase-2 from Glycine max (L) Merr.: comprehending its evolutionary conservancy at functional level. 3 Biotech. 8 (1):50.
McCarty NS, Graham AE, Studená L, Ledesma-Amaro R (2020) Multiplexed CRISPR technologies for gene editing and transcriptional regulation. Nat Commun 11(1):1281
Mikami M, Toki S, Endo M (2017) In Planta Processing of the SpCas9-gRNA Complex. Plant Cell Physiol 58:1857–1867
Pellagatti A, Dolatshad H, Valletta S, Boultwood J (2015) Application of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to the study and treatment of disease. Arch Toxicol 89:1023–1034
Punjabi M, Bharadvaja N, Sachdev A, Krishnan V (2018) Molecular characterization, modeling, and docking analysis of late phytic acid biosynthesis pathway gene, inositol polyphosphate 6-/3-/5-kinase, a potential candidate for developing low phytate crops.8 (8): 344
Raza G, Singh MB, Bhalla PL (2020) Somatic Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration from Commercial Soybean Cultivars. Plants 9(1):38
Sanson KR, Hanna RE, Hegde M, Donovan KF, Strand C, et al (2018) Optimized libraries for CRISPR-Cas9 genetic screens with multiple modalities. Nat Commun 9:5416
Schardl CL, Byrd AD, Benzion G, Altschuler MA, Hildebrand DA et al (1987) Design and construction of a versatile system for the expression of foreign genes in plants. Gene 61:1–11
Schmutz J, Cannon SB, Schlueter J, Ma J, Mitros T et al (2010) Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature 463:178–183
Shan Q, Wang Y, Li J, Zhang Y, Chen K et al (2013) Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system: Nat Biotechnol 31(8):686–688
Sparvoli F, Cominelli E (2015) Seed Biofortification and Phytic Acid Reduction: A Conflict of Interest for the Plant? Plants 4:728–755
Sun X, Hu Z, Chen R, Jiang Q, Song G, et al. (2015) Targeted mutagenesis in soybean using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Sci Rep 5.
Tang X, Zheng X, Qi Y, Zhang D, Cheng Y, Tang A, Voytas DF et al (2016) A single transcript CRISPR-Cas9 system for efficient genome editing in plants. Mol Plant 9:1088–1091
Tang X, Ren Q, Yang L, Bao Y, Zhong Z et al (2019) Single transcript unit CRISPR 2.0 systems for robust Cas9 and Cas12a mediated plant genome editing. Plant Biotechnol J 17:1431–1445
Torella JP, Lienert F, Boehm CR, Chen JH, Way JC et al (2014) Unique nucleotide sequence-guided assembly of repetitive DNA parts for synthetic biology applications. Nat Protoc 9:2075–2089
Verdaguer B, de Kochko A, Beachy RN et al (1996) Isolation and expression in transgenic tobacco and rice plants, of the cassava vein mosaic virus (CVMV) promoter. Plant Mol Biol 31:1129–1139. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00040830
Wang M, Mao Y, Lu Y, Wang Z, Tao X, et al. (2018) Multiplex gene editing in rice with simplified CRISPR-Cpf1 and CRISPR-Cas9 systems: J Integr Plant Biol. 2018;60(8):626–631.
Wiedenheft B, Sternberg SH, Doudna JA (2012) RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea. Nature 482:331–338
Wolter F, Schindele P, Puchta H (2019) Plant breeding at the speed of light: the power of CRISPR/Cas to generate directed genetic diversity at multiple sites. BMC Plant Biol 19:176
Xie K, Mikenberg B, Yang Y (2014) Boosting CRISPR/Cas9 multiplex editing capability with the endogenous tRNA-processing system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(11):3570–3575
Xue LJ, Tsai CJ (2015) AGEseq: Analysis of Genome Editing by Sequencing. Mol Plant 8:1428–1430
Yuan FJ, Zhu DH, Tan YY, Dong DK, Fu XJ et al (2012) Identification and characterization of the soybean IPK1 ortholog of a low phytic acid mutant reveals an exon-excluding splice-site mutation. Theor Appl Genet 125(7):1413–1423
Zhang Z, Mao Y, Ha S, Liu W, Botella JR et al (2016) A multiplex CRISPR/Cas9 platform for fast and efficient editing of multiple genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep 35:1519–2153
This study was supported in part by Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa), with funds allocated to the Georgia Agricultural Experiment Stations (Athens, GA, USA) and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Brazil). J. Carrijo was supported by a fellowship from Cordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, Brazil).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Consent to participate and publication
All authors consented to their participation and the publication of this manuscript.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carrijo, J., Illa-Berenguer, E., LaFayette, P. et al. Two efficient CRISPR/Cas9 systems for gene editing in soybean. Transgenic Res 30, 239–249 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-021-00246-x
- Genome editing
- Low phytic acid
- Single transcriptional unit
- Two-component transcriptional unit