Development of marker-free transgenic lettuce resistant to Mirafiori lettuce big-vein virus
- 390 Downloads
Lettuce big-vein disease caused by Mirafiori lettuce big-vein virus (MLBVV) is found in major lettuce production areas worldwide, but highly resistant cultivars have not yet been developed. To produce MLBVV-resistant marker-free transgenic lettuce that would have a transgene with a promoter and terminator of lettuce origin, we constructed a two T-DNA binary vector, in which the first T-DNA contained the selectable marker gene neomycin phosphotransferase II, and the second T-DNA contained the lettuce ubiquitin gene promoter and terminator and inverted repeats of the coat protein (CP) gene of MLBVV. This vector was introduced into lettuce cultivars ‘Watson’ and ‘Fuyuhikari’ by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation. Regenerated plants (T0 generation) that were CP gene-positive by PCR analysis were self-pollinated, and 312 T1 lines were analyzed for resistance to MLBVV. Virus-negative plants were checked for the CP gene and the marker gene, and nine lines were obtained which were marker-free and resistant to MLBVV. Southern blot analysis showed that three of the nine lines had two copies of the CP gene, whereas six lines had a single copy and were used for further analysis. Small interfering RNAs, which are indicative of RNA silencing, were detected in all six lines. MLBVV infection was inhibited in all six lines in resistance tests performed in a growth chamber and a greenhouse, resulting in a high degree of resistance to lettuce big-vein disease. Transgenic lettuce lines produced in this study could be used as resistant cultivars or parental lines for breeding.
KeywordsTransgenic lettuce Marker-free Lettuce big-vein disease Mirafiori lettuce big-vein virus (MLBVV) Virus resistance
This work was supported by the research program ‘Development of innovative crops through the molecular analysis of useful genes’ funded by National Agricultural Research Organization, Japan.
- Fauquet CM, Mayo MA, Maniloff J, Desselberger U, Ball LA (eds) (2005) Virus taxonomy: eighth report of the International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses. Elsevier Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- Hayes RJ, Ryder EJ (2007) Introgression of partial resistance to big vein disease from Lactuca virosa into cultivated lettuce. HortScience 42:35–39Google Scholar
- Jagger IC, Chandler N (1934) Big vein, a disease of lettuce. Phytopathol 24:1253–1256Google Scholar
- Kawazu Y, Fujiyama R, Sugiyama K, Sasaya T (2006) A transgenic lettuce line with resistance to both lettuce big-vein associated virus and mirafiori lettuce virus. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 131:760–763Google Scholar
- Kawazu Y, Sugiyama K, Noguchi Y, Kojima A, Sakata Y, Fujino M, Yui S, Kataoka S (2010b) ‘Fuyuhikari’: a new lettuce cultivar with resistance to lettuce big-vein disease. Bull Natl Inst Veg and Tea Sci 9:125–136 (in Japanese, with English summary)Google Scholar
- Lu S, Yin X, Spollen W, Zhang N, Xu D, Schoelz J, Bilyeu K, Zhang ZJ (2015) Analysis of the siRNA-mediated gene silencing process targeting three homologous genes controlling soybean seed oil quality. PLoS One 10(6):e0129010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129010 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Ryder EJ (1991) ‘Pacific’ lettuce. HortScience 26:437–438Google Scholar
- Ryder EJ, Robinson BJ (1995) Big-vein resistance in lettuce: identifying, selecting, and testing resistant cultivars and breeding lines. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 120:741–746Google Scholar