Transgenic Research

, Volume 25, Issue 5, pp 711–719 | Cite as

Development of marker-free transgenic lettuce resistant to Mirafiori lettuce big-vein virus

  • Yoichi Kawazu
  • Ryoi Fujiyama
  • Shunsuke Imanishi
  • Hiroyuki Fukuoka
  • Hirotaka Yamaguchi
  • Satoru Matsumoto
Original Paper


Lettuce big-vein disease caused by Mirafiori lettuce big-vein virus (MLBVV) is found in major lettuce production areas worldwide, but highly resistant cultivars have not yet been developed. To produce MLBVV-resistant marker-free transgenic lettuce that would have a transgene with a promoter and terminator of lettuce origin, we constructed a two T-DNA binary vector, in which the first T-DNA contained the selectable marker gene neomycin phosphotransferase II, and the second T-DNA contained the lettuce ubiquitin gene promoter and terminator and inverted repeats of the coat protein (CP) gene of MLBVV. This vector was introduced into lettuce cultivars ‘Watson’ and ‘Fuyuhikari’ by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation. Regenerated plants (T0 generation) that were CP gene-positive by PCR analysis were self-pollinated, and 312 T1 lines were analyzed for resistance to MLBVV. Virus-negative plants were checked for the CP gene and the marker gene, and nine lines were obtained which were marker-free and resistant to MLBVV. Southern blot analysis showed that three of the nine lines had two copies of the CP gene, whereas six lines had a single copy and were used for further analysis. Small interfering RNAs, which are indicative of RNA silencing, were detected in all six lines. MLBVV infection was inhibited in all six lines in resistance tests performed in a growth chamber and a greenhouse, resulting in a high degree of resistance to lettuce big-vein disease. Transgenic lettuce lines produced in this study could be used as resistant cultivars or parental lines for breeding.


Transgenic lettuce Marker-free Lettuce big-vein disease Mirafiori lettuce big-vein virus (MLBVV) Virus resistance 



This work was supported by the research program ‘Development of innovative crops through the molecular analysis of useful genes’ funded by National Agricultural Research Organization, Japan.


  1. Bos L, Huijberts N (1990) Screening for resistance to big-vein disease of lettuce (Lactuca sativa). Crop Prot 9:446–452. doi: 10.1016/0261-2194(90)90135-T CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dale EC, Ow DW (1991) Gene transfer with subsequent removal of the selection gene from the host genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:10558–10562CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Daley M, Knauf VC, Summerfelt KR, Turner JC (1998) Co-transformation with one Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain containing two binary plasmids as a method for producing marker-free transgenic plants. Plant Cell Rep 17:489–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Edwards K, Johnstone C, Thompson C (1991) A simple and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 19:1349CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Fauquet CM, Mayo MA, Maniloff J, Desselberger U, Ball LA (eds) (2005) Virus taxonomy: eighth report of the International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses. Elsevier Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  6. Gleave AP, Mitra DS, Mudge SR, Morris BAM (1999) Selectable marker-free transgenic plants without sexual crossing: transient expression of cre recombinase and use of a conditional lethal dominant gene. Plant Mol Biol 40:223–235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Goldsbrough AP, Lastrella CN, Yoder JI (1993) Transposition mediated re-positioning and subsequent elimination of marker genes from transgenic tomato. Nat Biotechnol 11:1286–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hayes RJ, Ryder EJ (2007) Introgression of partial resistance to big vein disease from Lactuca virosa into cultivated lettuce. HortScience 42:35–39Google Scholar
  9. Jagger IC, Chandler N (1934) Big vein, a disease of lettuce. Phytopathol 24:1253–1256Google Scholar
  10. Kawazu Y, Fujiyama R, Sugiyama K, Sasaya T (2006) A transgenic lettuce line with resistance to both lettuce big-vein associated virus and mirafiori lettuce virus. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 131:760–763Google Scholar
  11. Kawazu Y, Fujiyama R, Noguchi Y (2008) Transgenic resistance to Mirafiori lettuce virus in lettuce carrying inverted repeats of the viral coat protein gene. Transgenic Res 18(1):113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kawazu Y, Fujiyama R, Noguchi Y, Kubota M, Ito H, Fukuoka H (2010a) Detailed characterization of Mirafiori lettuce virus-resistant transgenic lettuce. Transgenic Res 19:211–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kawazu Y, Sugiyama K, Noguchi Y, Kojima A, Sakata Y, Fujino M, Yui S, Kataoka S (2010b) ‘Fuyuhikari’: a new lettuce cultivar with resistance to lettuce big-vein disease. Bull Natl Inst Veg and Tea Sci 9:125–136 (in Japanese, with English summary)Google Scholar
  14. Komari T, Hiei Y, Saito Y, Murai N, Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higher plants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers. Plant J 10:165–174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuroda M, Kimizu M, Mikami C (2010) A simple set of plasmids for the production of transgenic plants. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 74:2348–2351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lot H, Campbell RN, Souche S, Milne RG, Roggero P (2002) Transmission by Olpidium brassicae of Mirafiori lettuce virus and Lettuce big-vein virus, and their roles in lettuce big-vein etiology. Phytopathol 92:288–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lu S, Yin X, Spollen W, Zhang N, Xu D, Schoelz J, Bilyeu K, Zhang ZJ (2015) Analysis of the siRNA-mediated gene silencing process targeting three homologous genes controlling soybean seed oil quality. PLoS One 10(6):e0129010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129010 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Maccarone LD, Barbetti MJ, Sivasithamparam K, Jones RAC (2010) Comparison of the coat protein genes of Mirafiori lettuce big-vein virus isolates from Australia with those of isolates from other continents. Arch Virol 155:1519–1522CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Matthews PR, Wang MB, Waterhouse PM, Thornton SJ, Fieg SJ, Gubler F, Jacobsen JV (2001) Marker gene elimination from transgenic barley, using co-transformation with adjacent ‘twin T-DNAs’ on a standard Agrobacterium transformation vector. Mol Breed 7:195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McKnight TD, Lillis MT, Simpson RB (1987) Segregation of genes transferred to one plant cell from two separate Agrobacterium strains. Plant Mol Biol 8:439–445CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Roggero P, Ciuffo M, Vaira AM, Accotto GP, Masenga V, Milne RG (2000) An Ophiovirus isolated from lettuce with big-vein symptoms. Arch Virol 145:2629–2642CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ryder EJ (1991) ‘Pacific’ lettuce. HortScience 26:437–438Google Scholar
  23. Ryder EJ, Robinson BJ (1995) Big-vein resistance in lettuce: identifying, selecting, and testing resistant cultivars and breeding lines. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 120:741–746Google Scholar
  24. Sasaya T, Koganezawa H (2006) Molecular analysis and virus transmission tests place Olpidium virulentus, a vector of Mirafiori lettuce big-vein virus and tobacco stunt virus, as a distinct species rather than a strain of Olpidium brassicae. J Gen Plant Pathol 72:20–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Saurabh S, Vidyarthi AS, Prasad D (2014) RNA interference: concept to reality in crop improvement. Planta 239:543–564CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith NA, Singh SP, Wang M-B, Stoutjesdijk PA, Green AG, Waterhouse PM (2000) Total silencing by intron-spliced hairpin RNAs. Nature 407:319–320. doi: 10.1038/35036500 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sugita K, Kasahara T, Matsunaga E, Ebinuma H (2000) A transformation vector for the production of marker-free transgenic plants containing a single copy transgene at high frequency. Plant J 22:461–469CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Walsh JA (1994) Effects of some biotic and abiotic factors on symptom expression of lettuce big-vein virus in lettuce (Lactuca sativa). J Hortic Sci 69:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoichi Kawazu
    • 1
  • Ryoi Fujiyama
    • 1
  • Shunsuke Imanishi
    • 1
  • Hiroyuki Fukuoka
    • 1
  • Hirotaka Yamaguchi
    • 1
  • Satoru Matsumoto
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Vegetable and Floriculture Science, NAROTsuJapan
  2. 2.Tohoku Agricultural Research Center, NAROMoriokaJapan

Personalised recommendations