Today, over 7.1 billion people rely on the earth’s resources for sustenance, and nearly a billion people are malnourished, their minds and bodies unable to develop properly. Globally, population is expected to rise to more than 9 billion by 2050. Given the combined pressures of human population growth, the rapidly growing desire for increased levels of consumption, and the continued use of inappropriate technologies, it is not surprising that humans are driving organisms to extinction at an unprecedented rate. Many aspects of the sustainable functioning of the natural world are breaking down in the face of human-induced pressures including our individual and collective levels of consumption and our widespread and stubborn use of destructive technologies. Clearly, agriculture must undergo a redesign and be better and more effectively managed so as to contribute as well as possible to feeding people, while at the same time we strive to lessen the tragic loss of biodiversity and damage to all of its productive systems that the world is experiencing. For GM crops to be part of the solution, biosafety assessments should not be overly politically-driven or a burdensome impedance to delivering this technology broadly. Biosafety scientists and policy makers need to recognize the undeniable truth that inappropriate actions resulting in indecision also have negative consequences. It is no longer acceptable to delay the use of any strategy that is safe and will help us achieve the ability to feed the world’s people.
This is a preview of subscription content,to check access.
Access this article
Similar content being viewed by others
Quotation can be found at: http://www.pgeconomics.co.uk/page/33/global-impact-2012.
Brookes G, Barfoot P (2012) GM crops: global socio-economic and environmental impacts 1996–2010. PG Economics Ltd, UK available at: http://www.pgeconomics.co.uk/page/33/global-impact-2012
Carpenter J (2011) Impacts of GM crops on biodiversity. GM Crops 2:1–17
Hodson de Jaramillo E, Sensi A, Brandenberg, O et al (2011) Biosafety resource book, Module b, Ecological aspects. Food and Agriculture Organization. Rome, Italy. Available at: http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/i1905e/i1905e01.pdf
James C (2011) Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2011 ISAAA Brief No 43. ISAAA. Ithaca, NY. Available at: http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/43/default.asp
Kathage J, Qaim M (2012) Economic impacts and impact dynamics of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) cotton in India. PNAS. doi:10.1073/pnas.1203647109
Lu Y, Wu K, Jian Y, Guo Y, Desneux N (2011) Widespread adoption of Bt cotton and insecticide decrease promotes biocontrol services. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature11153
Pray CE, Ma D, Huang J, Qiao F (2001) Impact of Bt cotton in China. World Dev 29:813–825
Pray CE, Huang J, Hu R, Rozelle S (2002) Five years of Bt cotton in China–the benefits continue. Plant J 31:423–430
Qaim M (2009) The economics of genetically modified crops. Annu Rev Resour Econ 1:665–693. doi:10.1146/annurev.resource.050708.144203
Keynote lecture given to the 12th International Symposium on Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms in St Louis on 17th September 2012.
About this article
Cite this article
Raven, P.H. GM crops, the environment and sustainable food production. Transgenic Res 23, 915–921 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-013-9756-x