Transgenic Research

, Volume 23, Issue 6, pp 915–921 | Cite as

GM crops, the environment and sustainable food production

  • Peter H. RavenEmail author


Today, over 7.1 billion people rely on the earth’s resources for sustenance, and nearly a billion people are malnourished, their minds and bodies unable to develop properly. Globally, population is expected to rise to more than 9 billion by 2050. Given the combined pressures of human population growth, the rapidly growing desire for increased levels of consumption, and the continued use of inappropriate technologies, it is not surprising that humans are driving organisms to extinction at an unprecedented rate. Many aspects of the sustainable functioning of the natural world are breaking down in the face of human-induced pressures including our individual and collective levels of consumption and our widespread and stubborn use of destructive technologies. Clearly, agriculture must undergo a redesign and be better and more effectively managed so as to contribute as well as possible to feeding people, while at the same time we strive to lessen the tragic loss of biodiversity and damage to all of its productive systems that the world is experiencing. For GM crops to be part of the solution, biosafety assessments should not be overly politically-driven or a burdensome impedance to delivering this technology broadly. Biosafety scientists and policy makers need to recognize the undeniable truth that inappropriate actions resulting in indecision also have negative consequences. It is no longer acceptable to delay the use of any strategy that is safe and will help us achieve the ability to feed the world’s people.


Biosafety Biodiversity Environmental risk GM crops Sustainability Sustainable agriculture 


  1. Brookes G, Barfoot P (2012) GM crops: global socio-economic and environmental impacts 1996–2010. PG Economics Ltd, UK available at:
  2. Carpenter J (2011) Impacts of GM crops on biodiversity. GM Crops 2:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hodson de Jaramillo E, Sensi A, Brandenberg, O et al (2011) Biosafety resource book, Module b, Ecological aspects. Food and Agriculture Organization. Rome, Italy. Available at:
  4. James C (2011) Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2011 ISAAA Brief No 43. ISAAA. Ithaca, NY. Available at:
  5. Kathage J, Qaim M (2012) Economic impacts and impact dynamics of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) cotton in India. PNAS. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203647109 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Lu Y, Wu K, Jian Y, Guo Y, Desneux N (2011) Widespread adoption of Bt cotton and insecticide decrease promotes biocontrol services. Nature. doi: 10.1038/nature11153 Google Scholar
  7. Pray CE, Ma D, Huang J, Qiao F (2001) Impact of Bt cotton in China. World Dev 29:813–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pray CE, Huang J, Hu R, Rozelle S (2002) Five years of Bt cotton in China–the benefits continue. Plant J 31:423–430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Qaim M (2009) The economics of genetically modified crops. Annu Rev Resour Econ 1:665–693. doi: 10.1146/annurev.resource.050708.144203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.President EmeritusMissouri Botanical GardenSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations