Empathic Inaccuracy in Narrative Fiction

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    This description draws on the condensation of my theory in Keen (2015), pp. 155–9.

  2. 2.

    See my discussion in Keen 2018.

  3. 3.

    Anne Fernald, personal correspondence with the author.

References

  1. Atwood M (2003) Oryx and Crake. Bloomsbury, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Austen J (1814) Mansfield Park. Egerton, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Batson CD (2009) These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. In: Decety J, Ickes W (eds) Social neuroscience. The social neuroscience of empathy. MIT Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0002

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bloom H (1975) A Map of Misreading. Oxford UP, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  5. Danticat E (2004) The Dew Breaker. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davis MH (1980) A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog Sel Docs in Psychology 10:85

    Google Scholar 

  7. DeMan P (1971) Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism. Oxford UP, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. DeMan P (1979) Allegories of Reading: Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust. Yale UP, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  9. Felski R (2011) Suspicious Minds. Poetics Today 32.2:215–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Forster EM (1927) Aspects of the Novel. Harcourt, Brace & World, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Freud S (1907) Creative Writers and Day-Dreaming. In: Strachey J (ed) Standard Edn Complete Psychological Works Sigmund Freud, vol 9. 1959. Hogarth P and Institute of Psycho-Analysis, London

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gallagher C (1995) Nobody’s Story: The Vanishing Acts of Women Writers in the Marketplace, 1670–1920. U California P, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ickes W (1993) Empathic Accuracy. J Personality 61:4: 587–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Iser W (1972) The Reading Process: a Phenomenological Approach. New Literary Hist 3. 2: 279 – 99

  15. Keen S (2007) Empathy and the Novel. Oxford UP, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Keen S (2014) Narrative Empathy. In: Hühn P, Meister JC, Pier J (eds) Handbook of Narratology, vol 2, 2nd edn. DeGruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  17. Keen S (2015) Narrative Form: Revised and Expanded Second Edition. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills

    Google Scholar 

  18. Keen S (2018) Twenty-First Century Fictional Experiments with Emotion and Cognition. In: Baumbach S, Neumann B, Nünning A (eds) New Approaches to the 21st-century Anglophone Novel. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lanser SS (2009) Negative Plotting: Or, The Shadow Knows. Handout accompanying paper presented at International Society for the Study of Narrative Plenary Session, Birmingham, England 4–6 June 2009

  20. McEwan I (2001) Atonement. Jonathan Cape, London

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rosenblatt L (1938) Literature as Exploration. Appleton-Century, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Said E (1993) Culture and Imperialism. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sternberg M (1982) Proteus in Quotation-Land: Mimesis and the Forms of Reported Discourse. Poetics Today 3.2:107–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Taylor M, Hodges SD, Kohányi A (2003) The Illusion of Independent Agency: Do Adult Fiction Writers Experience Their Characters as Having Minds of Their Own? Imagination Cognition Personality 22(4):361–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wimsatt WK, Beardsley MC (1946) The Intentional Fallacy. Sewanee Rev 54.3: 468–88

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suzanne Keen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

I have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keen, S. Empathic Inaccuracy in Narrative Fiction. Topoi (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-9622-9

Download citation