Critical thinking is often taught with some emphasis on categories and operations of cognitive biases. The underlying thought is that knowledge of biases equips students to reduce them. The empirical evidence, however, doesn’t provide much support for this thought. We have previously argued that the emphasis on debiasing in critical thinking education is worth preserving, but in light of a more explicit and broader conception of debiasing. We now argue that this broader conception of debiasing strategies obliges critical thinking instructors and curriculum designers to reflect on the teaching approaches that might facilitate the use of those strategies. We propose some teaching techniques to expand the scope of debiasing in the classroom—some untested, some only rarely and recently characterized as critical thinking strategies, rather than as pragmatic considerations in, e.g., design, engineering, marketing. These methods and others like them, we suggest, broaden the prospects for teaching a range of effective critical thinking techniques for debiasing.
KeywordsCritical thinking Education Bias Debiasing Nudges
We are grateful to Tomás Magalhães Carneiro, Jennifer Saul, two anonymous referees for this journal, and the organizers and participants of the Reasoning, Argumentation, and Critical Thinking Instruction conference, held at Lund University in February 2015. This work was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
- Beaulac G, Robert S (2011) Théories à processus duaux et théories de l’éducation: le cas de l’enseignement de la pensée critique et de la logique. Les ateliers de l’éthique 6(1):63–77Google Scholar
- Brownstein M (2015) Implicit bias. In: Zalta EN (ed) The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2015 edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/implicit-bias/
- Elder L, Paul R (2013) 30 days to better thinking and better living through critical thinking: a guide for improving every aspect of your life (Rev and expanded [ed.]). FT Press, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
- Goffman E (1967) Interaction ritual: essays on face-to-face behavior. Anchor Books, Garden CityGoogle Scholar
- Gollwitzer PM, Sheeran P (2006) Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta‐analysis of effects and processes. In: Olson J, Zanna M (eds) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 38. Elsevier, pp 69–119Google Scholar
- Larrick RP (2004) Debiasing. In: Koehler DJ, Harvey N (eds) Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Madva A (2015) A plea for Anti-Anti-Individualism: how oversimple psychology misleads social policy. Manuscript submitted for publicationGoogle Scholar
- Scriven M, Paul R (1987) Critical thinking as defined by the National Council for Excellence in Critical Thinking. In: 8th Annual international conference on critical thinking and education reform. http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/defining-critical-thinking/766
- Soll JB, Milkman KL, Payne JW (2015) A user’s guide to debiasing. In: Wu G, Keren G (eds) Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Tetlock P (2005) Expert political judgment. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar