, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 525–530 | Cite as

Causal Exclusion and Multiple Realizations

  • Tuomas K. Pernu


A critical analysis of recent interventionist responses to the causal exclusion problem is presented. It is argued that the response can indeed offer a solution to the problem, but one that is based on renouncing the multiple realizability thesis. The account amounts to the rejection of nonreductive physicalism and would thus be unacceptable to many. It is further shown that if the multiple realizability thesis is brought back in and conjoined with the interventionist notion of causation, inter-level causation is ruled out altogether.


Causality Counterfactuals Epiphenomenalism Interactionism Interventionism Nonreductive physicalism 



I am grateful to an anonymous referee of Topoi for her critical comments on an earlier version of this article. This study has been financially supported by the Finnish Cultural Foundation and the Waldemar von Frenckell Foundation.


  1. Baumgartner M (2009) Interventionist causal exclusion and non-reductive physicalism. Int Stud Philos Sci 23:161–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Campbell J (2010) Control variables and mental causation. Proc Aristot Soc 110:15–30Google Scholar
  3. Kim J (1993) The nonreductivist’s troubles with mental causation. In: Heil J, Mele A (eds) Mental causation. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Kim J (1998) Mind in a physical world: an essay on the mind-body problem and mental causation. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Kim J (2005) Physicalism, or something near enough. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  6. List C, Menzies P (2009) Nonreductive physicalism and the limits of the exclusion principle. J Philos 106:475–502Google Scholar
  7. Menzies P (2008) The exclusion problem, the determination relation, and contrastive causation. In: Hohwy J, Kallestrup J (eds) Being reduced. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Menzies P, List C (2010) The causal autonomy of the special sciences. In: Macdonald G, Macdonald C (eds) Emergence in mind. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Raatikainen P (2010) Causation, exclusion, and the special sciences. Erkenntnis 73:349–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Shapiro LA (2000) Multiple realizations. J Philos 97:635–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Shapiro LA (2004) The mind incarnate. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Shapiro LA (2008) How to test for multiple realization. Philos Sci 75:514–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shapiro LA (2010) Lessons from causal exclusion. Philos Phenomenol Res 81:594–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shapiro LA (2012) Mental manipulations and the problem of causal exclusion. Australas J Philos 90:507–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shoemaker S (1980) Causality and properties. In: van Inwagen P (ed) Time and cause. D. Reidel Publishing, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  16. Shoemaker S (1998) Causal and metaphysical necessity. Pac Philos Q 79:59–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shoemaker S (2007) Physical realization. The Clarendon Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stoljar D (2008) Distinctions in distinction. In: Hohwy J, Kallestrup J (eds) Being reduced. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Woodward JF (2003) Making things happen: a theory of causal explanation. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiosciencesUniversity of HelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations