1 Correction to: Topics in Catalysis https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-021-01502-4
The original version of this article unfortunately contained an error and it is corrected with this erratum.
The correct expression of the utility function, defined by Eq. 6, is \(u\left(P,SG\right)=\frac{std\left(P\right)-std(SG)}{std(P)}.\) By using the difference of standard deviations in the utility function (and not their ratio, as indicated in the paper), we favour the selection of SGs that present narrow distributions of values for the target. This correction also concerns Table S1 and Fig. S1 of the ESI, where the expression of the utility function is shown. The code used for the SGD approach uses the correct expression for utility function evaluation. Therefore, the results and discussions are not affected by this correction.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Foppa, L., Ghiringhelli, L.M. Correction to: Identifying Outstanding Transition-Metal-Alloy Heterogeneous Catalysts for the Oxygen Reduction and Evolution Reactions via Subgroup Discovery. Top Catal 65, 207 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-021-01540-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-021-01540-y