Advertisement

Topics in Catalysis

, Volume 61, Issue 9–11, pp 1043–1076 | Cite as

Recent Progress in Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting Activity of WO3 Photoanodes

  • Shankara S. Kalanur
  • Le Thai Duy
  • Hyungtak Seo
Original Paper

Abstract

Photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting to generate clean fuel H2 and O2 from water and solar energy using semiconductor nanomaterials is a green technology which could fulfill the growing energy need of the future and environment concerns. WOx≤3 has received considerable attention in photo-assisted water splitting due to its fascinating advantages such as absorbance in visible region up to ~ 480 nm, low cost, and stability in acidic and oxidative conditions. In this review, an attempt is made to summarize the important efforts made in the literature on the employment of WO3 for PEC water splitting in the last 5 years. Great milestones in PEC performance of WO3 have been reached with possible improvements via morphology control, crystal structure/facet, introduction of oxygen vacancy/defects and choice of suitable electrolyte. It is established that, WO3 nanostructure thin films require annealing, usually between 450 and 550 °C to attain more crystallinity and monoclinic phase of WOx≤3 is the most stable phase at room temperature and demonstrated highest photocatalytic activity when compared to other crystal phases. WO3 structures that are tightly interconnected and strongly bound to the metal collector substrate result in increased photogenerated charge collection efficiency while increase in PEC operating temperature augments the gas evolution quantity. Finally, we provide possibility for further improvements in WO3-based PCE which may be required to enhance its efficiency in water splitting.

Keywords

WO3 Photoelectrochemical water splitting Morphology Defect states Crystal structure Crystal facet Electrolyte Tungsten substrate 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (KRF-2017R1D1A1B03035201). This research was also supported by the Basic Science Program through the National Research Foundation (NRF-2015R1A2A2A01003790) funded respectively by the MEST and ICT, Republic of Korea.

References

  1. 1.
    Palmstrom AF, Santra PK, Bent SF (2015) Atomic layer deposition in nanostructured photovoltaics: tuning optical, electronic and surface properties. Nanoscale 7:12266–12283.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR02080H Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Waisman H, Rozenberg J, Sassi O, Hourcade J-C (2012) Peak oil profiles through the lens of a general equilibrium assessment. Energy Policy 48:744–753.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.005 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jewell J, Vinichenko V, McCollum D et al (2016) Comparison and interactions between the long-term pursuit of energy independence and climate policies. Nat Energy 1:nenergy201673.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.73 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Martinez Suarez C, Hernández S, Russo N (2015) BiVO4 as photocatalyst for solar fuels production through water splitting: a short review. Appl Catal Gen 504:158–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2014.11.044 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahmed M, Xinxin G (2016) A review of metal oxynitrides for photocatalysis. Inorg Chem Front 3:578–590.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5QI00202H Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Porosoff MD, Yan B, Chen JG (2016) Catalytic reduction of CO2 by H2 for synthesis of CO, methanol and hydrocarbons: challenges and opportunities. Energy Environ Sci 9:62–73.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EE02657A Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Osterloh FE (2013) Inorganic nanostructures for photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic water splitting. Chem Soc Rev 42:2294–2320.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CS35266D Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen X, Zhang Z, Chi L et al (2016) Recent advances in visible-light-driven photoelectrochemical water splitting: catalyst nanostructures and reaction systems. Nano-Micro Lett 8:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-015-0063-3 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tee SY, Win KY, Teo WS et al (2017) Recent progress in energy-driven water splitting. Adv Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201600337 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Walter MG, Warren EL, McKone JR et al (2010) Solar water splitting cells. Chem Rev 110:6446–6473.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr1002326 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chiarello GL, Aguirre MH, Selli E (2010) Hydrogen production by photocatalytic steam reforming of methanol on noble metal-modified TiO2. J Catal 273:182–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2010.05.012 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grätzel M (2005) Solar energy conversion by dye-sensitized photovoltaic cells. Inorg Chem 44:6841–6851.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ic0508371 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li G, Shrotriya V, Huang J et al (2005) High-efficiency solution processable polymer photovoltaic cells by self-organization of polymer blends. Nat Mater 4:nmat1500.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1500 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hains AW, Liang Z, Woodhouse MA, Gregg BA (2010) Molecular semiconductors in organic photovoltaic cells. Chem Rev 110:6689–6735.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr9002984 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ahmad H, Kamarudin SK, Minggu LJ, Kassim M (2015) Hydrogen from photo-catalytic water splitting process: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 43:599–610.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.101 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Navarro Yerga RM, Álvarez Galván MC, delValle F et al (2009) Water splitting on semiconductor catalysts under visible-light irradiation. ChemSusChem 2:471–485.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.200900018 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Izumi Y (2013) Recent advances in the photocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide to fuels with water and/or hydrogen using solar energy and beyond. Coord Chem Rev 257:171–186.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2012.04.018 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lang X, Chen X, Zhao J (2013) Heterogeneous visible light photocatalysis for selective organic transformations. Chem Soc Rev 43:473–486.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CS60188A Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kenney MJ, Gong M, Li Y et al (2013) High-performance silicon photoanodes passivated with ultrathin nickel films for water oxidation. Science 342:836–840.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1241327 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jacobsson TJ, Fjällström V, Edoff M, Edvinsson T (2014) Sustainable solar hydrogen production: from photoelectrochemical cells to PV-electrolyzers and back again. Energy Environ Sci 7:2056–2070.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EE00754A Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brattain WH, Garrett CGB (1955) Experiments on the interface between germanium and an electrolyte. Bell Syst Tech J 34:129–176.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1955.tb03766.x Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gerischer H (1966) Electrochemical behavior of semiconductors under illumination. J Electrochem Soc 113:1174–1182.  https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2423779 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pleskov Y (2012) Semiconductor photoelectrochemistry. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marcus RA (2003) Chemical and electrochemical electron-transfer theory. In: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pc.15.100164.001103. http://www.annualreviews.org/abs/. Accessed 24 Nov 2017
  25. 25.
    Fujishima A, Honda K (1972) Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 238:238037a0.  https://doi.org/10.1038/238037a0 Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bard AJ (1979) Photoelectrochemistry and heterogeneous photo-catalysis at semiconductors. J Photochem 10:59–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2670(79)80037-4 Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nozik AJ (1978) Photoelectrochemistry: applications to solar energy conversion. Annu Rev Phys Chem 29:189–222.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pc.29.100178.001201 Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Duonghong D, Borgarello E, Graetzel M (1981) Dynamics of light-induced water cleavage in colloidal systems. J Am Chem Soc 103:4685–4690.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00406a004 Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jiang C, Moniz SJ, Wang A, et al (2017) Photoelectrochemical devices for solar water splitting—materials and challenges. Chem Soc Rev 46:4645–4660.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00306K Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Di Valentin C, Pacchioni G (2014) Spectroscopic properties of doped and defective semiconducting oxides from hybrid density functional calculations. Acc Chem Res 47:3233–3241.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ar4002944 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mi Q, Zhanaidarova A, Brunschwig BS et al (2012) A quantitative assessment of the competition between water and anion oxidation at WO3 photoanodes in acidic aqueous electrolytes. Energy Environ Sci 5:5694–5700.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2EE02929D Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Huang Z-F, Song J, Pan L et al (2015) Tungsten oxides for photocatalysis, electrochemistry, and phototherapy. Adv Mater 27:5309–5327.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201501217 Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kalanur SS, Hwang YJ, Chae SY, Joo OS (2013) Facile growth of aligned WO3 nanorods on FTO substrate for enhanced photoanodic water oxidation activity. J Mater Chem A 1:3479–3488.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TA01175E Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liu X, Wang F, Wang Q (2012) Nanostructure-based WO3 photoanodes for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Phys Chem Chem Phys 14:7894–7911.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CP40976C Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhu J, Li W, Li J et al (2013) Photoelectrochemical activity of NiWO4/WO3 heterojunction photoanode under visible light irradiation. Electrochim Acta 112:191–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2013.08.146 Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wijs GA de, Boer PK de, Groot RA de, Kresse G (1999) Anomalous behavior of the semiconducting gap in WO3 from first-principles calculations. Phys Rev B 59:2684–2693.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.2684 Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kehl WL, Hay RG, Wahl D (1952) The structure of tetragonal tungsten trioxide. J Appl Phys 23:212–215.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1702176 Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Salje E (1977) The orthorhombic phase of WO3. Acta Crystallogr B 33:574–577.  https://doi.org/10.1107/S0567740877004130 Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tanisaki S (1960) Crystal structure of monoclinic tungsten trioxide at room temperature. J Phys Soc Jpn 15:573–581.  https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.15.573 Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Diehl R, Brandt G, Saije E (1978) The crystal structure of triclinic WO3. Acta Crystallogr B 34:1105–1111.  https://doi.org/10.1107/S0567740878005014 Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Woodward PM, Sleight AW, Vogt T (1995) Structure refinement of triclinic tungsten trioxide. J Phys Chem Solids 56:1305–1315.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(95)00063-1 Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Salje E (1976) Structural phase transitions in the system WO3-NaWO3. Ferroelectrics 12:215–217.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00150197608241431 Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Migas DB, Shaposhnikov VL, Rodin VN, Borisenko VE (2010) Tungsten oxides. I: effects of oxygen vacancies and doping on electronic and optical properties of different phases of WO3. J Appl Phys 108:093713.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3505688 Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bullett DW (1983) Bulk and surface electron states in WO3 and tungsten bronzes. J Phys C Solid State Phys 16:2197.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/16/11/022 Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Valdés Á, Kroes G-J (2009) First principles study of the photo-oxidation of water on tungsten trioxide (WO3). J Chem Phys 130:114701.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3088845 Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Xie YP, Liu G, Yin L, Cheng H-M (2012) Crystal facet-dependent photocatalytic oxidation and reduction reactivity of monoclinic WO3 for solar energy conversion. J Mater Chem 22:6746–6751.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2JM16178H Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Guo Y, Quan X, Lu N et al (2007) High photocatalytic capability of self-assembled nanoporous WO3 with preferential orientation of (002) planes. Environ Sci Technol 41:4422–4427.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es062546c Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wang S, Chen H, Gao G et al (2016) Synergistic crystal facet engineering and structural control of WO3 films exhibiting unprecedented photoelectrochemical performance. Nano Energy 24:94–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.04.010 Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Jiao Y, Zheng Y, Jaroniec M, Qiao SZ (2014) Origin of the electrocatalytic oxygen reduction activity of graphene-based catalysts: a roadmap to achieve the best performance. J Am Chem Soc 136:4394–4403.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja500432h Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Cahen D, Hodes G, Manassen J (1976) Tungsten trioxide as a photoanode for a photoelectrochemical cell (PEC). Nature 260:312.  https://doi.org/10.1038/260312a0 Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zhu T, Chong MN, Chan ES (2014) Nanostructured tungsten trioxide thin films synthesized for photoelectrocatalytic water oxidation: a review. ChemSusChem 7:2974–2997.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201402089 Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Zhao W, Wang Z, Shen X et al (2012) Hydrogen generation via photoelectrocatalytic water splitting using a tungsten trioxide catalyst under visible light irradiation. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:908–915.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.03.161 Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Tacca A, Meda L, Marra G et al (2012) Photoanodes based on nanostructured WO3 for water splitting. ChemPhysChem 13:3025–3034.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201200069 Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Li W, Liu C, Yang Y et al (2012) Platelike WO3 from hydrothermal RF sputtered tungsten thin films for photoelectrochemical water oxidation. Mater Lett 84:41–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2012.06.022 Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Qin D-D, Tao C-L, Friesen SA et al (2011) Dense layers of vertically oriented WO3 crystals as anodes for photoelectrochemical water oxidation. Chem Commun 48:729–731.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CC15691H Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Yang J, Li W, Li J et al (2012) Hydrothermal synthesis and photoelectrochemical properties of vertically aligned tungsten trioxide (hydrate) plate-like arrays fabricated directly on FTO substrates. J Mater Chem 22:17744–17752.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2JM33199C Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Biswas SK, Baeg J-O, Moon S-J et al (2012) Morphologically different WO3 nanocrystals in photoelectrochemical water oxidation. J Nanoparticle Res 14:667.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-011-0667-6 Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Wei W, Shaw S, Lee K, Schmuki P (2012) Rapid anodic formation of high aspect ratio WO3 layers with self-ordered nanochannel geometry and use in photocatalysis. Chem-Eur J 18:14622–14626.  https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201202420 Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Wang G, Ling Y, Wang H et al (2012) Hydrogen-treated WO3 nanoflakes show enhanced photostability. Energy Environ Sci 5:6180–6187.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2EE03158B Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Caramori S, Cristino V, Meda L et al (2012) Efficient anodically grown WO3 for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Energy Procedia 22:127–136.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2012.05.214 Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Solarska R, Jurczakowski R, Augustynski J (2012) A highly stable, efficient visible-light driven water photoelectrolysis system using a nanocrystalline WO3 photoanode and a methane sulfonic acid electrolyte. Nanoscale 4:1553–1556.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2NR11573E Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Chen Q, Li J, Zhou B et al (2012) Preparation of well-aligned WO3 nanoflake arrays vertically grown on tungsten substrate as photoanode for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Electrochem Commun 20:153–156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2012.03.043 Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Gonçalves RH, Leite LDT, Leite ER (2012) Colloidal WO3 nanowires as a versatile route to prepare a photoanode for solar water splitting. ChemSusChem 5:2341–2347.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201200484 Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Shinde PS, Go GH, Lee WJ (2013) Multilayered large-area WO3 films on sheet and mesh-type stainless steel substrates for photoelectrochemical hydrogen generation. Int J Energy Res 37:323–330.  https://doi.org/10.1002/er.1912 Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Biswas SK, Baeg J-O (2013) A facile one-step synthesis of single crystalline hierarchical WO3 with enhanced activity for photoelectrochemical solar water oxidation. Int J Hydrog Energy 38:3177–3188.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.12.114 Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Zhang J, Ling Y, Gao W et al (2013) Enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting on novel nanoflake WO3 electrodes by dealloying of amorphous Fe–W alloys. J Mater Chem A 1:10677–10685.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TA12273E Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Reyes-Gil KR, Wiggenhorn C, Brunschwig BS, Lewis NS (2013) Comparison between the quantum yields of compact and porous WO3 photoanodes. J Phys Chem C 117:14947–14957.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp4025624 Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Chandra D, Saito K, Yui T, Yagi M (2013) Crystallization of tungsten trioxide having small mesopores: highly efficient photoanode for visible-light-driven water oxidation. Angew Chem Int Ed 52:12606–12609.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201306004 Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Ng C, Ng YH, Iwase A, Amal R (2013) Influence of annealing temperature of WO3 in photoelectrochemical conversion and energy storage for water splitting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:5269–5275.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am401112q Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Kwong WL, Qiu H, Nakaruk A et al (2013) Photoelectrochemical properties of WO3 thin films prepared by electrodeposition. Energy Procedia 34:617–626.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.793 Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Lai CW, Sreekantan S (2013) Fabrication of WO3 nanostructures by anodization method for visible-light driven water splitting and photodegradation of methyl orange. Mater Sci Semicond Process 16:303–310.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2012.10.007 Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Rao PM, Cho IS, Zheng X (2013) Flame synthesis of WO3 nanotubes and nanowires for efficient photoelectrochemical water-splitting. Proc Combust Inst 34:2187–2195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2012.06.122 Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Zheng JY, Song G, Hong J et al (2014) Facile fabrication of WO3 nanoplates thin films with dominant crystal facet of (002) for water splitting. Cryst Growth Des 14:6057–6066.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cg5012154 Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Hilaire S, Süess MJ, Kränzlin N et al (2014) Microwave-assisted nonaqueous synthesis of WO3 nanoparticles for crystallographically oriented photoanodes for water splitting. J Mater Chem A 2:20530–20537.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA04793A Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Zhang X, Chandra D, Kajita M et al (2014) Facile and simple fabrication of an efficient nanoporous WO3 photoanode for visible-light-driven water splitting. Int J Hydrog Energy 39:20736–20743.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.06.062 Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Wang N, Wang D, Li M et al (2014) Photoelectrochemical water oxidation on photoanodes fabricated with hexagonal nanoflower and nanoblock WO3. Nanoscale 6:2061–2066.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C3NR05601E Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Rodríguez-Pérez M, Chacón C, Palacios-González E et al (2014) Photoelectrochemical water oxidation at electrophoretically deposited WO3 films as a function of crystal structure and morphology. Electrochim Acta 140:320–331.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2014.03.022 Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Memar A, Phan CM, Tade MO (2014) Controlling particle size and photoelectrochemical properties of nanostructured WO3 with surfactants. Appl Surf Sci 305:760–767.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.03.194 Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Liu Y, Xie S, Liu C et al (2014) Facile synthesis of tungsten oxide nanostructures for efficient photoelectrochemical water oxidation. J Power Sources 269:98–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.07.012 Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Wang N, Zhu J, Zheng X et al (2015) A facile two-step method for fabrication of plate-like WO3 photoanode under mild conditions. Faraday Discuss 176:185–197.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4FD00139G Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Li W, Da P, Zhang Y et al (2014) WO3 nanoflakes for enhanced photoelectrochemical conversion. ACS Nano 8:11770–11777.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn5053684 Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Liu Y, Zhao L, Su J et al (2015) Fabrication and properties of a branched (NH4)xWO3 nanowire array film and a porous WO3 nanorod array film. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:3532–3538.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am507230t Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Shin S, Han HS, Kim JS et al (2015) A tree-like nanoporous WO3 photoanode with enhanced charge transport efficiency for photoelectrochemical water oxidation. J Mater Chem A 3:12920–12926.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA00823A Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Balandeh M, Mezzetti A, Tacca A et al (2015) Quasi-1D hyperbranched WO3 nanostructures for low-voltage photoelectrochemical water splitting. J Mater Chem A 3:6110–6117.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA06786J Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Ding J-R, Kim K-S (2016) Facile growth of 1-D nanowire-based WO3 thin films with enhanced photoelectrochemical performance. AIChE J 62:421–428.  https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.15105 Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Emin S, de Respinis M, Fanetti M et al (2015) A simple route for preparation of textured WO3 thin films from colloidal W nanoparticles and their photoelectrochemical water splitting properties. Appl Catal B Environ 166–167:406–412.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.11.053 Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Nukui Y, Srinivasan N, Shoji S et al (2015) Vertically aligned hexagonal WO3 nanotree electrode for photoelectrochemical water oxidation. Chem Phys Lett 635:306–311.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2015.07.006 Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Zhang T, Wang L, Su J, Guo L (2016) Branched tungsten oxide nanorod arrays synthesized by controlled phase transformation for solar water oxidation. ChemCatChem 8:2119–2127.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201600267 Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Reinhard S, Rechberger F, Niederberger M (2016) Commercially available WO3 nanopowders for photoelectrochemical water splitting: photocurrent versus oxygen evolution. ChemPlusChem 81:935–940.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cplu.201600241 Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Mohamed AM, Amer AW, AlQaradawi SY, Allam NK (2016) On the nature of defect states in tungstate nanoflake arrays as promising photoanodes in solar fuel cells. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:22217–22223.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CP02394K Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Zhu T, Chong MN, Phuan YW, Chan E-S (2015) Electrochemically synthesized tungsten trioxide nanostructures for photoelectrochemical water splitting: influence of heat treatment on physicochemical properties, photocurrent densities and electron shuttling. Colloids Surf Physicochem Eng Asp 484:297–303.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.08.016 Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Fernández-Domene RM, Sánchez-Tovar R, Lucas-Granados B, García-Antón J (2016) Improvement in photocatalytic activity of stable WO3 nanoplatelet globular clusters arranged in a tree-like fashion: influence of rotation velocity during anodization. Appl Catal B Environ 189:266–282.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.02.065 Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Sfaelou S, Pop L-C, Monfort O et al (2016) Mesoporous WO3 photoanodes for hydrogen production by water splitting and PhotoFuelCell operation. Int J Hydrog Energy 41:5902–5907.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.02.063 Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Liu Y, Li J, Tang H et al (2016) Enhanced photoelectrochemical performance of plate-like WO3 induced by surface oxygen vacancies. Electrochem Commun 68:81–85.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2016.05.004 Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Calero SJ, Ortiz P, Oñate AF, Cortés MT (2016) Effect of proton intercalation on photo-activity of WO3 anodes for water splitting. Int J Hydrog Energy 41:4922–4930.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.12.155 Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Valerini D, Hernández S, Di Benedetto F et al (2016) Sputtered WO3 films for water splitting applications. Mater Sci Semicond Process 42:150–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2015.09.013 Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Yoon H, Mali MG, Kim M et al (2016) Electrostatic spray deposition of transparent tungsten oxide thin-film photoanodes for solar water splitting. Catal Today 260:89–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2015.03.037 Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Nakajima T, Hagino A, Nakamura T et al (2016) WO3 nanosponge photoanodes with high applied bias photon-to-current efficiency for solar hydrogen and peroxydisulfate production. J Mater Chem A 4:17809–17818.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA07997K Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Jin T, Xu D, Diao P et al (2016) Tailored preparation of WO3 nano-grassblades on FTO substrate for photoelectrochemical water splitting. CrystEngComm 18:6798–6808.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CE01186A Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Zhao Z, Butburee T, Lyv M et al (2016) Etching treatment of vertical WO3 nanoplates as a photoanode for enhanced photoelectrochemical performance. RSC Adv 6:68204–68210.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA11750C Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Park M, Seo JH, Song H, Nam KM (2016) Enhanced visible light activity of single-crystalline WO3 microplates for photoelectrochemical water oxidation. J Phys Chem C 120:9192–9199.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b00389 Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Ding J-R, Kim K-S (2016) Flame synthesized single crystal nanocolumn-structured WO3 thin films for photoelectrochemical water splitting. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 16:1578–1582Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Fan X, Gao B, Wang T et al (2016) Layered double hydroxide modified WO3 nanorod arrays for enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting. Appl Catal Gen 528:52–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2016.09.014 Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Go GH, Shinde PS, Doh CH, Lee WJ (2016) PVP-assisted synthesis of nanostructured transparent WO3 thin films for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Mater Des 90:1005–1009.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.042 Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Liu Y, Liang L, Xiao C et al (2016) Promoting photogenerated holes utilization in pore-rich WO3 ultrathin nanosheets for efficient oxygen-evolving photoanode. Adv Energy Mater.  https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201600437 Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Mohamed AM, Shaban SA, El Sayed HA et al (2016) Morphology–photoactivity relationship: WO3 nanostructured films for solar hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 41:866–872.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.09.108 Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Uchiyama H, Igarashi S, Kozuka H (2016) Evaporation-driven deposition of WO3 thin films from organic-additive-free aqueous solutions by low-speed dip coating and their photoelectrochemical properties. Langmuir 32:3116–3121.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b00377 Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Cai M, Fan P, Long J et al (2017) Large-scale tunable 3D self-supporting WO3 micro-nano architectures as direct photoanodes for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:17856–17864.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b02386 Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Mai M, Ma X, Zhou H et al (2017) Effect of oxygen pressure on pulsed laser deposited WO3 thin films for photoelectrochemical water splitting. J Alloys Compd 722:913–919.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.108 Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Chen P, Baldwin M, Bandaru PR (2017) Hierarchically structured, oxygen deficient, tungsten oxide morphologies for enhanced photoelectrochemical charge transfer and stability. J Mater Chem A 5:14898–14905.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA04118G Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Li T, He J, Peña B, Berlinguette CP (2016) Exposure of WO3 photoanodes to ultraviolet light enhances photoelectrochemical water oxidation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:25010–25013.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b08152 Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Olejníček J, Brunclíková M, Kment Š et al (2017) WO3 thin films prepared by sedimentation and plasma sputtering. Chem Eng J 318:281–288.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.09.083 Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Fang Y, Lee WC, Canciani GE et al (2015) Thickness control in electrophoretic deposition of WO3 nanofiber thin films for solar water splitting. Mater Sci Eng B 202:39–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2015.09.005 Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Zhang J, Salles I, Pering S et al (2017) Nanostructured WO3 photoanodes for efficient water splitting via anodisation in citric acid. RSC Adv 7:35221–35227.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA05342H Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Hassan Mirfasih M, Li C, Tayyebi A et al (2017) Oxygen-vacancy-induced photoelectrochemical water oxidation by platelike tungsten oxide photoanodes prepared under acid-mediated hydrothermal treatment conditions. RSC Adv 7:26992–27000.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA03691D Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Hilliard S, Baldinozzi G, Friedrich D et al (2017) Mesoporous thin film WO3 photoanode for photoelectrochemical water splitting: a sol–gel dip coating approach. Sustain Energy Fuels 1:145–153.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6SE00001K Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Kafizas A, Francàs L, Sotelo-Vazquez C et al (2017) Optimizing the activity of nanoneedle structured WO3 photoanodes for solar water splitting: direct synthesis via chemical vapor deposition. J Phys Chem C 121:5983–5993.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b00533 Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Chiarello GL, Bernareggi M, Pedroni M et al (2017) Enhanced photopromoted electron transfer over a bilayer WO3 n–n heterojunction prepared by RF diode sputtering. J Mater Chem A 5:12977–12989.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA03887A Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Kalantar-zadeh K, Vijayaraghavan A, Ham M-H et al (2010) Synthesis of atomically thin WO3 sheets from hydrated tungsten trioxide. Chem Mater 22:5660–5666.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cm1019603 Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Jiao Z, Wang J, Ke L et al (2011) Morphology-tailored synthesis of tungsten trioxide (Hydrate) thin Films and their photocatalytic properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3:229–236.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am100875z Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Bendova M, Gispert-Guirado F, Hassel AW et al (2017) Solar water splitting on porous-alumina-assisted TiO2-doped WOx nanorod photoanodes: paradoxes and challenges. Nano Energy 33:72–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.029 Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Chandra D, Mridha S, Basak D, Bhaumik A (2009) Template directed synthesis of mesoporous ZnO having high porosity and enhanced optoelectronic properties. Chem Commun 0:2384–2386.  https://doi.org/10.1039/B901941C Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Girishkumar G, Vinodgopal K, Kamat PV (2004) Carbon nanostructures in portable fuel cells: single-walled carbon nanotube electrodes for methanol oxidation and oxygen reduction. J Phys Chem B 108:19960–19966.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp046872v Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Riccardis MFD (2012) Ceramic coatings obtained by electrophoretic deposition: fundamentals, models, post-deposition processes and applications,  https://doi.org/10.5772/29435
  125. 125.
    Gurrappa I, Binder L (2008) Electrodeposition of nanostructured coatings and their characterization—a review. Sci Technol Adv Mater 9:043001.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1468-6996/9/4/043001 Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    Pourbaix M (1974) Atlas of electrochemical equilibria in aqueous solutions. National Association of Corrosion Engineers, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Hill JC, Choi K-S (2012) Effect of electrolytes on the selectivity and stability of n-type WO3 photoelectrodes for use in solar water oxidation. J Phys Chem C 116:7612–7620.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp209909b Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    (2000) CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 81st edn. In: Lide DR (ed) National Institute of Standards and Technology. CRC Press, Boca Raton. ISBN 0-8493-0481-4Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Seabold JA, Choi K-S (2011) Effect of a cobalt-based oxygen evolution catalyst on the stability and the selectivity of photo-oxidation reactions of a WO3 photoanode. Chem Mater 23:1105–1112.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cm1019469 Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Weinhardt L, Blum M, Bär M et al (2008) Electronic surface level positions of WO3 thin films for photoelectrochemical hydrogen production. J Phys Chem C 112:3078–3082.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp7100286 Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Reichert R, Zambrzycki C, Jusys Z, Behm RJ (2015) Photo-electrochemical oxidation of organic C1 molecules over WO3 films in aqueous electrolyte: competition between water oxidation and C1 oxidation. ChemSusChem 8:3677–3687.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201500800 Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Yan J, Wang T, Wu G et al (2015) Tungsten oxide single crystal nanosheets for enhanced Multichannel solar light harvesting. Adv Mater 27:1580–1586.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201404792 Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Antila LJ, Heikkilä MJ, Mäkinen V et al (2011) ALD grown aluminum oxide submonolayers in dye-sensitized solar cells: the effect on interfacial electron transfer and performance. J Phys Chem C 115:16720–16729.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp204886n Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Wang T, Luo Z, Li C, Gong J (2014) Controllable fabrication of nanostructured materials for photoelectrochemical water splitting via atomic layer deposition. Chem Soc Rev 43:7469–7484.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CS60370A Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Deb SK (1977) Electron spin resonance of defects in single crystal and thin films of tungsten trioxide. Phys Rev B 16:1020–1024.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.16.1020 Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    Singh T, Müller R, Singh J, Mathur S (2015) Tailoring surface states in WO3 photoanodes for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. Appl Surf Sci 347:448–453.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.04.126 Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    Hossain MF, Takahashi T (2013) Effect of annealing temperature on nanostructured WO3 films on P-Si substrate. Procedia Eng 56:702–706.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.181 Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    Dias P, Lopes T, Meda L et al (2016) Photoelectrochemical water splitting using WO3 photoanodes: the substrate and temperature roles. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:5232–5243.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP06851G Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Lopes T, Dias P, Andrade L, Mendes A (2014) An innovative photoelectrochemical lab device for solar water splitting. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 128:399–410.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2014.05.051 Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    Qi H, Wolfe J, Wang D et al (2014) Triple-layered nanostructured WO3 photoanodes with enhanced photocurrent generation and superior stability for photoelectrochemical solar energy conversion. Nanoscale 6:13457–13462.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4NR03982C Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    Haussener S, Hu S, Xiang C et al (2013) Simulations of the irradiation and temperature dependence of the efficiency of tandem photoelectrochemical water-splitting systems. Energy Environ Sci 6:3605–3618.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EE41302K Google Scholar
  142. 142.
    Andrade L, Lopes T, Mendes A (2012) Dynamic phenomenological modeling of pec cells for water splitting under outdoor conditions. Energy Procedia 22:23–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2012.05.227 Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    Li T, He J, Peña B, Berlinguette CP (2016) Curing BiVO4 photoanodes with ultraviolet light enhances photoelectrocatalysis. Angew Chem Int Ed 55:1769–1772.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201509567 Google Scholar
  144. 144.
    Loopstra BO, Rietveld HM (1969) Further refinement of the structure of WO3. Acta Crystallogr B 25:1420–1421.  https://doi.org/10.1107/S0567740869004146 Google Scholar
  145. 145.
    Datt Bhatt M, Sung Lee J (2015) Recent theoretical progress in the development of photoanode materials for solar water splitting photoelectrochemical cells. J Mater Chem A 3:10632–10659.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA00257E Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shankara S. Kalanur
    • 1
  • Le Thai Duy
    • 2
  • Hyungtak Seo
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringAjou UniversitySuwonRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Energy Systems ResearchAjou UniversitySuwonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations