Advertisement

Topics in Catalysis

, Volume 58, Issue 7–9, pp 410–415 | Cite as

Computationally-Guided Synthesis of the 8-Ring Zeolite AEI

  • Joel E. Schmidt
  • Michael W. DeemEmail author
  • Christopher Lew
  • Tracy M. Davis
Original Paper

Abstract

A computational method capable of predicting chemically-synthesizable organic structure directing agents (OSDAs) for targeted microporous material frameworks has been applied to the zeolite SSZ-39 (AEI framework topology). The top predicted OSDA has been found to have a more favorable stabilization energy than any of the OSDAs previously reported to form SSZ-39. This result was verified experimentally, demonstrating that this computational method is capable of predicting successful OSDAs for zeolite synthesis mixtures containing a large number of inorganic variables such as heteroatoms, inorganic cations, hydroxide media and high water content. This is a significant improvement over the first experimental validation of this computational method.

Keywords

Computational guidance Zeolite synthesis SSZ-39 (AEIStructure directing agents 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This article is dedicated to Professor Mark E. Davis in honor of his ACS Gabor A. Somorjai Award for Creative Research in Catalysis. The computational method described here was developed by DOE grant number DE-FG02-03ER15456. The work was supported by Chevron Energy Technology Company. J.E.S. would like to thank the NDSEG for their support through a fellowship.

References

  1. 1.
    Davis ME (2002) Ordered porous materials for emerging applications. Nature 417:813–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vermeiren W, Gilson J-P (2009) Impact of zeolites on the petroleum and petrochemical industry. Top Catal 52:1131–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cundy CS, Cox PA (2003) The hydrothermal synthesis of zeolites: history and development from the earliest days to the present time. Chem Rev 103:663–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pophale R, Daeyaert F, Deem MW (2013) Computational prediction of chemically synthesizable organic structure directing agents for zeolites. J Mater Chem A 1:6750–6760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burton A, Zones S (2007) Organic molecules in zeolite synthesis: their preparation and structure-directing effects. Stud Surf Sci Catal 168:137–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kubota Y, Helmkamp MM, Zones SI, Davis ME (1996) Properties of organic cations that lead to the structure-direction of high-silica molecular sieves. Microporous Mater 6:213–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zones SI, Nakagawa Y, Lee GS, Chen CY, Yuen LT (1998) Searching for new high silica zeolites through a synergy of organic templates and novel inorganic conditions. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 21:199–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moliner M, Rey F, Corma A (2013) Towards the rational design of efficient organic structure-directing agents for zeolite synthesis. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 52:13880–13889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schmitt KD, Kennedy GJ (1994) Toward the rational design of zeolite synthesis: the synthesis of zeolite ZSM-18. Zeolites 14:635–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lewis DW, Freeman CM, Catlow CRA (1995) Predicting the templating ability of organic additives for the synthesis of microporous materials. J Phys Chem 99:11194–11202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lewis DW, Willock DJ, Catlow CRA, Thomas JM, De Hutchings GJ (1996) Novo design of structure-directing agents for the synthesis of microporous solids. Nature 382:604–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schmidt JE, Deem MW, Davis ME (2014) Synthesis of a specified, silica molecular sieve by using computationally predicted organic structure-directing agents. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 53:8372–8374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martínez C, Corma A (2011) Inorganic molecular sieves: preparation, modification and industrial application in catalytic processes. Coord Chem Rev 255:1558–1580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Corma A (2003) State of the art and future challenges of zeolites as catalysts. J Catal 216:298–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zones SI (2011) Translating new materials discoveries in zeolite research to commercial manufacture. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 144:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang Z, Yu J, Xu R (2012) Needs and trends in rational synthesis of zeolitic materials. Chem Soc Rev 41:1729–1741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Robson H (2001) Verified synthesis of zeolitic materials. Gulf Professional Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Abboud J, Notario R (1990) One century of physical organic chemistry: the Menshutkin reaction. Prog Phys Org Chem 19(183):7Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moliner M, Franch C, Palomares E, Grill M, Corma A (2012) Cu-SSZ-39, an active and hydrothermally stable catalyst for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx. Chem Commun (Camb) 48:8264–8266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Evans ST, Lee GS, Nakagawa Y, Zones SI (1999) Zeolite SSZ-39. US Patent 5,958,370, 1999Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wagner P, Nakagawa Y, Lee GS, Davis ME, Elomari S, Medrud RC, Zones SI (2000) Guest/host relationships in the synthesis of the novel cage-based zeolites SSZ-35, SSZ-36, and SSZ-39. J Am Chem Soc 122:263–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nakagawa Y, Lee GS, Harris TV, Yuen LT, Zones SI (1998) Guest/host relationships in zeolite synthesis: ring-substituted piperidines and the remarkable adamantane mimicry by 1-azonio spiro [5.5] undecanes. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 22:69–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mayo SL, Olafson BD, Goddard WA (1990) DREIDING: a generic force field for molecular simulations. J Phys Chem 94:8897–8909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gale JD, Rohl AL (2003) The general utility lattice program (GULP). Mol Simul 29:291–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gale JD (1996) Empirical potential derivation for ionic materials. Philos Mag B 73:3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gale JD (1997) GULP: a computer program for the symmetry-adapted simulation of solids. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 93:629–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lin L-C, Berger AH, Martin RL, Kim J, Swisher JA, Jariwala K, Rycroft CH, Bhown AS, Deem MW, Haranczyk M et al (2012) In silico screening of carbon-capture materials. Nat Mater 11:633–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joel E. Schmidt
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michael W. Deem
    • 3
    Email author
  • Christopher Lew
    • 1
  • Tracy M. Davis
    • 1
  1. 1.Chevron Energy Technology CompanyRichmondUSA
  2. 2.Chemical EngineeringCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA
  3. 3.Departments of Bioengineering and Physics & AstronomyRice UniversityHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations