Predictive Assessment of Groundwater Flow Uncertainty in Multiscale Porous Media by Using Truncated Power Variogram Model
- 37 Downloads
The spatial distribution of hydrogeological properties is essentially heterogeneous. Heterogeneity can be characterized quantitatively using geostatistics, which conventionally assumes that the stochastic process is stationary. However, growing evidence indicates that the spatial variability has the multiscale self-similarity characteristics and can be better characterized using non-stationary model but with statistically homogeneous increments. A general framework is developed in this work to conduct the uncertainty quantification analysis by using truncated power variogram model, which can explicitly account for measurement scale, observation scale, and window scale. The effect of the multiscale characteristics of the hydrogeological properties on the uncertainty and the consequential risk associated with the groundwater flow process is investigated. A synthetic two-dimensional saturated steady-state groundwater flow problem is used to evaluate the performance to predict the flow field distribution. For comparative purposes, the evaluation is based on both the truncated power and the traditional variogram models when the underlying porous medium is a random fractal field. The results show that the truncated power variogram model can perform the uncertainty quantification more accurately, and the adoption of traditional variogram model tends to result in a smoother estimation on the flow field and underestimate the uncertainty associated with the hydraulic head prediction. Upscaling is generally inevitable to avoid predictive uncertainty underestimation when the underlying random field exhibits multiscale characteristics.
KeywordsMultiscale Random fractals Observation scale Truncated power variogram Geostatistics
This work is funded by the Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum - Beijing (Grant No. 2462014YJRC038), the National Science and Technology Major Project (Grant No. 2016ZX05037003), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41602250) and China Geological Survey (Grant No. DD20160293).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest or financial disclosures to report.
- Deutsch, C.V., Journel, A.G.: GSLIB Geostatistical Software Library and User’s Guide, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1998)Google Scholar
- Dieker, T.: Simulation of fractional Brownian motion. M.Sc. thesis, University of Twente (2004)Google Scholar
- Eschard, R., Doligez, B., Beucher, H.: Using quantitative outcrop databases as a guide for geological reservoir modelling. In: Geostatistics Rio 2000. pp. 7–17. Springer, Dordrecht (2002)Google Scholar
- Goncalvès, J., Violette, S., Guillocheau, F., Robin, C., Pagel, M., Bruel, D., Marsily, G.D., Ledoux, E.: Contribution of a three-dimensional regional scale basin model to the study of the past fluid flow evolution and the present hydrology of the Paris basin, France. Basin Res. 16(4), 569–586 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harbaugh, A.W., Banta, E.R., Hill, M.C., Mcdonald, M.G.: MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. geological survey modular ground-water flow model-User guide to modularization concepts and the ground-water flow process. U.S. Geol. Surv. Open File Rep., 00–92 (2000)Google Scholar
- Hu, L.Y., Chugunova, T.: Multiple-point geostatistics for modeling subsurface heterogeneity: a comprehensive review. Water Resour. Res. 44(11), 2276–2283 (2008)Google Scholar
- Lopez, S., Cojan, I., Rivoirard, J., Galli, A.: Process-Based Stochastic Modelling: Meandering Channelized Reservoirs. Wiley, New York (2009)Google Scholar
- Prykhodko, V., Attinger, S.: Generating random fields with a truncated power-law variogram: a comparison of several numerical methods. Environ. Model Softw. 55(55), 32–48 (2014)Google Scholar
- Siena, M., Guadagnini, A., Riva, M., Neuman, S.P.: Extended power-law scaling of air permeabilities measured on a block of tuff. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Dis. 8(4), 29–42 (2011)Google Scholar
- Strebelle, S., Zhang, T.: Non-Stationary Multiple-Point Geostatistical Models. Springer, Dordrecht (2004)Google Scholar
- Zimmerman, D.A., Marsily, G.D., Gotway, C.A., Marietta, M.G., Axness, C.L., Beauheim, R.L., Bras, R.L., Carrera, J., Dagan, G., Davies, P.B.: A comparison of seven geostatistically based inverse approaches to estimate transmissivities for modeling advective transport by groundwater flow. Water Resour. Res. 34(6), 1373–1413 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar