Transport in Porous Media

, Volume 124, Issue 1, pp 237–261 | Cite as

A Multiscale Approach for Geologically and Flow Consistent Modeling

  • Pejman Tahmasebi
  • Serveh Kamrava


Subsurface geological models are usually constructed on high-resolution grids in a way that various complexities and heterogeneities are depicted properly. Such models, however, cannot be used directly in the current flow simulators, as they are tied with high computational cost. Thus, using upscaling, by which one can produce flow consistent models that can alleviate the computational burden of flow simulators, is inevitable. Although the upscaling methods are able to reproduce the flow responses, they might not retain the initial geological assumptions. The reservoir models are initially constructed on uniform and high-resolution grids and then, if necessary, are upscaled to be used for flow simulations. A subsurface modeling approach that not only preserves the geological heterogeneity but also provides models that can be used, straight or with a small level of upscaling, in the flow simulators is desirable. In this paper, a new multiresolution method based on (1) the importance of conditioning well data and (2) being geologically and flow consistent is presented. This method discretizes the initial model into several regions based on the available data. Then, the initial assumed geological model is converted into, for example, various high- and low-resolution models. Next, the high-resolution model is used for regions with high-quality data (e.g., well locations), while the low-resolution model is used for the remaining areas. Finally, the patterns of these areas are interlocked, which result in a multiresolution geologically and flow consistent subsurface model. The accuracy of this method is demonstrated using two-phase flow simulation on four complex subsurface systems. The results indicate that the same flow responses, in a much less time, are reproduced using the multiscale models. The speed-up factor gained using the proposed method is also several orders of magnitude.


Two-phase flow Multiresolution modeling Geological model SPE-10 Data assimilation 



The financial support from the University of Wyoming for this research is greatly acknowledged. The critical reviews from the Associate Editor and anonymous reviewers that led to improving the initial submission are greatly appreciated. The significant help of S. Kamrava in the performing some of the computations is also greatly acknowledged.


  1. Arpat, B., Caers, J.: Stochastic simulation with patterns. Math. Geol. 39, 177–203 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ates, H., Bahar, A., Salem, S.E.-A., Charfeddine, M., Kelkar, M.G.: Ranking and upscaling of geostatistical reservoir models using streamline simulation: a field case study. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 8, 22–32 (2005). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Babaei, M., Elsheikh, A.H., King, P.R.: A comparison study between an adaptive quadtree grid and uniform grid upscaling for reservoir simulation. Transp. Porous Media 98, 377–400 (2013). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bahrainian, S.S., Dezfuli, A.D.: A geometry-based adaptive unstructured grid generation algorithm for complex geological media. Comput. Geosci. 68, 31–37 (2014). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, Z., Hou, T.Y.: A mixed multiscale finite element method for elliptic problems with oscillating coefficients. Math. Comput. 72, 541–577 (2002). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christie, M.A., Blunt, M.J.: Tenth SPE comparative solution project: a comparison of upscaling techniques. In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2001)Google Scholar
  7. Deutsch, C.V., Wang, L.: Hierarchical object-based stochastic modeling of fluvial reservoirs. Math. Geol. 28, 857–880 (1996). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Durlofsky, L.J.: Upscaling and gridding of fine scale geological models for flow simulation. In: 8th International Forum on Reservoir Simulation, Stresa, Italy (2005)Google Scholar
  9. Ebrahimi, F., Sahimi, M.: Multiresolution wavelet scale up of unstable miscible displacements in flow through heterogeneous porous media. Transp. Porous Media 57, 75–102 (2004). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Edwards, M.G.: Elimination of adaptive grid interface errors in the discrete cell centered pressure equation. J. Comput. Phys. 126, 356–372 (1996). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. El Ouassini, A., Saucier, A., Marcotte, D., Favis, B.D.: A patchwork approach to stochastic simulation: a route towards the analysis of morphology in multiphase systems. Chaos Solitons Fract. 36, 418–436 (2008). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fincham, A.E., Christensen, J.R., Barker, J.W., Samier, P.: Up-gridding from geological model to simulation model: review, applications and limitations. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2004)Google Scholar
  13. Forsyth, P.A., Sammon, P.H.: Local mesh refinement and modeling of faults and pinchouts. SPE Form. Eval. 1, 275–285 (1986). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gholinezhad, S., Jamshidi, S., Hajizadeh, A.: Quad-tree decomposition method for areal upscaling of heterogeneous reservoirs: application to arbitrary shaped reservoirs. Fuel 139, 659–670 (2015). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ghorbanidehno, H., Kokkinaki, A., Li, J.Y., Darve, E., Kitanidis, P.K.: Real-time data assimilation for large-scale systems: the spectral Kalman filter. Adv Water Resour 86, 260–272 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ghorbanidehno, H., Kokkinaki, A., Kitanidis, P.K., Darve, E.: Optimal estimation and scheduling in aquifer management using the rapid feedback control method. Adv Water Resour 110, 310–318 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goovaerts, P.: Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1997)Google Scholar
  18. Guardiano, F.B., Srivastava, R.M.: Multivariate geostatistics: beyond bivariate moments. In: Geostatistics Troia’92, pp. 133–144. Springer, Berlin (1993)Google Scholar
  19. Hajibeygi, H., Bonfigli, G., Hesse, M.A., Jenny, P.: Iterative multiscale finite-volume method. J. Comput. Phys. 227, 8604–8621 (2008). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haldorsen, H.H., Damsleth, E.: Stochastic modeling (includes associated papers 21255 and 21299). J. Pet. Technol. 42, 404–412 (1990). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holden, L., Hauge, R., Skare, Ø., Skorstad, A.: Modeling of fluvial reservoirs with object models. Math. Geol. 30, 473–496 (1998). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hosseini, S.A., Kelkar, M.G.: Analytical upgridding method to preserve dynamic flow behavior. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2008)Google Scholar
  23. Hou, T.Y., Wu, X.-H.: A multiscale finite element method for elliptic problems in composite materials and porous media. J. Comput. Phys. 134, 169–189 (1997). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jenny, P., Tchelepi, H.A., Lee, S.H.: Unconditionally convergent nonlinear solver for hyperbolic conservation laws with S-shaped flux functions. J. Comput. Phys. 228, 7497–7512 (2009). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Journel, A., Zhang, T.: The necessity of a multiple-point prior model. Math. Geol. 38, 591–610 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Journel, A.G., Huijbregts, C.J.: Mining Geostatistics. Academic Press, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  27. King, M.J., Burn, K.S., Wang, P., Muralidharan, V., Alvarado, F.E., Ma, X., Datta-Gupta, A.: Optimal coarsening of 3D reservoir models for flow simulation. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 9, 317–334 (2006). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kippe, V., Aarnes, J.E., Lie, K.-A.: A comparison of multiscale methods for elliptic problems in porous media flow. Comput. Geosci. 12, 377–398 (2008). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Knuth, D.E.: The Art of Computer Programming: Sorting and Searching. Pearson Education, Reading (1998)Google Scholar
  30. Li, D., Beckner, B.: Optimal uplayering for scaleup of multimillion-cell geologic models. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2000)Google Scholar
  31. Li, D., Beckner, B., Kumar, A.: A new efficient averaging technique for scaleup of multimillion-cell geologic models. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (1999)Google Scholar
  32. Li, D., Cullick, A.S., Lake, L.W.: Global scale-up of reservoir model permeability with local grid refinement. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 14, 1–13 (1995). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lindeberg, T.: Scale-Space Theory in Computer Vision. Kluwer Academic, Boston (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moslehi, M., de Barros, F.P.J., Ebrahimi, F., Sahimi, M.: Upscaling of solute transport in disordered porous media by wavelet transformations. Adv. Water Resour. 96, 180–189 (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Quandalle, P., Besset, P.: Reduction of grid effects due to local sub-gridding in simulations using a composite grid. In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers (1985)Google Scholar
  36. Rasaei, M.R., Sahimi, M.: Upscaling and simulation of waterflooding in heterogeneous reservoirs using wavelet transformations: application to the SPE-10 model. Transp. Porous Media 72, 311–338 (2008). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rasaei, M.R., Sahimi, M.: Upscaling of the permeability by multiscale wavelet transformations and simulation of multiphase flows in heterogeneous porous media. Comput. Geosci. 13, 187–214 (2009). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sharifi, M., Kelkar, M.: New upgridding method to capture the dynamic performance of the fine scale heterogeneous reservoir. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 86–87, 225–236 (2012). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stern, D., Dawson, A.G.: A technique for generating reservoir simulation grids to preserve geologic heterogeneity. In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers (1999)Google Scholar
  40. Strebelle, S.: Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point statistics. Math. Geol. 34, 1–21 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tahmasebi, P.: HYPPS: a hybrid geostatistical modeling algorithm for subsurface modeling. Water Resour. Res. 53, 5980–5997 (2017). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tahmasebi, P.: Nanoscale and multiresolution models for shale samples. Fuel 217, 218–225 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tahmasebi, P., Hezarkhani, A., Sahimi, M.: Multiple-point geostatistical modeling based on the cross-correlation functions. Comput. Geosci. 16, 779–797 (2012). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tahmasebi, P., Javadpour, F., Frébourg, G.: Geologic modeling of eagle ford facies continuity based on outcrop images and depositional processes. SPE J (2018a). Google Scholar
  45. Tahmasebi, P., Javadpour, F., Sahimi, M.: Stochastic shale permeability matching: three-dimensional characterization and modeling. Int. J. Coal Geol. 165, 231–242 (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tahmasebi, P., Sahimi, M.: Enhancing multiple-point geostatistical modeling: 2. Iterative simulation and multiple distance function. Water Resour. Res. 52, 2099–2122 (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tahmasebi, P., Sahimi, M., Andrade, J.E.: Image-based modeling of granular porous media. Geophys. Res. Lett. (2017a). Google Scholar
  48. Tahmasebi, P., Sahimi, M., Kohanpur, A.H., Valocchi, A.: Pore-scale simulation of flow of CO2 and brine in reconstructed and actual 3D rock cores. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. (2017b). Google Scholar
  49. Tahmasebi, P., Sahimi, M., Shirangi, M.G.: Rapid learning-based and geologically consistent history matching. Transp. Porous Media (2018b). Google Scholar
  50. Taware, S.V., Friedel, T., Datta-Gupta, A.: A practical approach for assisted history matching using grid coarsening and streamline-based inversion: experiences in a giant carbonate reservoir. In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2011)Google Scholar
  51. Testerman, J.D.: A statistical reservoir-zonation technique. J. Pet. Technol. 14, 889–893 (1962). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vo, H.X., Durlofsky, L.J.: A new differentiable parameterization based on principal component analysis for the low-dimensional representation of complex geological models. Math. Geosci. 46, 775–813 (2014). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vo, H.X., Durlofsky, L.J.: Data assimilation and uncertainty assessment for complex geological models using a new PCA-based parameterization. Comput. Geosci. 19, 747–767 (2015). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wen, R., Martinius, A.W., Naess, A., Ringrose, P.: Three-dimensional simulation of small-scale heterogeneity in tidal deposits—a process-based stochastic simulation method. In: IAMG, International Association for Mathematical Goesciences. pp. 129–134 (1998)Google Scholar
  55. Zhang, T., Switzer, P., Journel, A.: Filter-based classification of training image patterns for spatial simulation. Math. Geol. 38, 63–80 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Petroleum EngineeringUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA

Personalised recommendations