Skip to main content
Log in

Two-Phase Immiscible Flows in Porous Media: The Mesocopic Maxwell–Stefan Approach

  • Published:
Transport in Porous Media Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We develop an approach to coupling between viscous flows of the two phases in porous media, based on the Maxwell–Stefan formalism. Two versions of the formalism are presented: the general form, and the form based on the interaction of the flowing phases with the interface between them. The last approach is supported by the description of the flow on the mesoscopic level, as coupled boundary problems for the Brinkmann or Stokes equations. It becomes possible, in some simplifying geometric assumptions, to derive exact expressions for the phenomenological coefficients in the Maxwell–Stefan transport equations. Sample computations show, among other, that apparent relative permeabilities are dependent on the viscosity ratio; that the overall mobility of the phases decreases compared to the standard Buckley–Leverett formalism; and that the effect is determined by the parameter determining the “degree of mixing” between the flowing phases. Comparison to the available experimental data on the steady-state two-phase relative permeabilities is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(A\) :

Cross-sectional area

\(\mathbf{D}\) :

Vector of pressure gradients

\(I\!_P \) :

Fraction of the active jets

\(F\) :

Fractional flow function

\(G\) :

Force

\(k\) :

Permeability

\(K\) :

Mesoscopic permeability

\(l\) :

Proportionality coefficients

\(L\) :

Length

\(M\) :

Dimensionless mobility

\(P\) :

Pressure

\(r\) :

Distance to the jet center

\(r\!_j\) :

Inner radius in the jet model

\(R\) :

Outer radius in the jet model

\(s\) :

Saturation

\(u\) :

Interstitial velocity

\(U\) :

Superficial velocity

\(V\) :

Velocity of the moving interface

\(W\) :

Mesoscopic velocity

\(x\) :

Coordinate in the flow direction

\(y,z\) :

Coordinates orthogonal to the flow direction

\(W\) :

Mesoscopic flow velocity

\(Z\) :

Operator in the equation governing the mesoscopic flow velocity

\(\alpha \) :

Friction coefficient

\(\beta \) :

Multiplier transforming superficial to interstitial velocity

\(\gamma \) :

Ratio of the effective Brinkman to the real phase viscosity

\(\Gamma \) :

Boundary of a region

\(\phi \) :

Porosity

\(\kappa \) :

Inverse matrix of resistance coefficients

\(\lambda \) :

Onsager phenomenological coefficient

\(\Lambda \) :

Matrix of phenomenological Onsager coefficients

\(\mu \) :

Viscosity or viscosity ratio

\(\tau \) :

Tortuosity

\(\xi \) :

Ratio of the characteristic jet size to the characteristic pore scale of the porous medium

\(\omega \) :

Auxiliary function in the expression for mesoscopic velocity

\(d\) :

Driving (pressure force)

\(e\) :

Effective (viscosity in the Brinkman equation)

\(j\) :

Jet

\(o\) :

“Orange”

\(r\) :

Relative

\(s\) :

Solid (porous medium matrix)

\(P\) :

Pressure

\(V\) :

Interface

\(wi,\;or\) :

Irreducible or residual

\(w\) :

“White”

References

  • Amaziane, B., Milisic, J.P., Panfilov, M., Pankratov, L.: Generalized nonequilibrium capillary relations for two-phase flow through heterogeneous media. Phys. Rev. E 85, 016304 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avraam, D.G., Payatakes, A.C.: Flow regimes and relative permeabilities during steady-state two-phase flow in porous media. J. Fluid Mech. 293, 207–236 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayub, M., Bentsen, R.G.: Interfacial viscous coupling: a myth or reality? J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 23, 13–26 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P.E.: Discussion of “Effect of Viscosity Ratio on Relative Permeability”, paper SPE 1496-G, November (1960)

  • Barenblatt, G.I.: Flow of two immiscible fluids in homogeneous porous media. Izvestiia Akademii Nauk SSSR, Mekhanika Zhidkosti i Gaza 5, 144–151 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barenblatt, G.I., Entov, W.M., Ryzhik, M.: Theory of Fluid Flows Through Natural Rocks. Kluwer, The Netherlands (1990)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barenblatt, G.I., Patzek, T.W., Silin, D.B.: The mathematical model of non-equilibrium effects in water oil displacement. SPE J. December, 409–416 (2003)

  • Bear, J., Cheng, A.H.-D.: Modeling Groundwater Flow and Contaminant Transport. Springer, Berlin (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bedrikovetsky, P.G.: Mathematical Theory of Oil and Gas Recovery With Application to ex-USSR Oil and Gas Fields. Kluwer, The Netherlands (1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bedrikovetsky, P.G.: WAG displacements of oil-condensates accounting for hydrocarbon ganglia. Transp. Porous Media 52, 229–266 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourblaux, B.J., Kalaydjian, F.J.: Experimental study of cocurrent and countercurrent flows in natural porous media. Paper SPE 18283, SPE Reservoir Engineering, August, 361–368 (1990)

  • Cueto-Felgueroso, L., Juanes, R.: A phase-field model of unsaturated flow. Water Resour. Res. 45, W10409 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • DiCarlo, D.A.: Comment on “a phase field model of unsaturated flow” by L. Cueto-Felgueroso and R. Juanes. Water Resour. Res. 46, W12801 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinariev, OYu., Mikhailov, D.N.: Modeling of capillary pressure hysteresis and of hysteresis of relative permeabilities in porous materials on the basis of the pore ensemble concept. J. Eng. Phys. Thermophys. 81(6), 1128–1135 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downie, J., Crane, F.E.: Effect of viscosity on relative permeability, paper SPE 1629. SPE J. 1(2), 59–60 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dullien, F.A.L., Dong, M.: Experimental determination of the flow transport coefficients in the coupled equations of two-phase flow in porous media. Transp. Porous Media 25, 97–120 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dullien, F.A.L.: Porous Media : Fluid Transport and Pore Structure. Academic press, Massachusetts (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastwood, J.E., Spanos, T.J.T.: Steady-state countercurrent flow in one dimension. Transp. Porous Media 6, 173–182 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eleri, O.O., Graue, A., Skauge, A.: Steady-state and unsteady-state two-phase relative permeability hysteresis and measurements of three-phase relative permeabilities using imaging techniques. Paper SPE 30764 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition held in Dallas, USA, 22–25 Oct (1995)

  • Fulcher, R.A., Ertekin, T., Stahl, C.D.: Effect of capillary number and its constituents on two-phase relative permeability curves. J. Pet. Technol. February, 249–260 (1985)

  • Hassanizadeh, S.M., Gray, W.G.: Mechanics and thermodynamics of multiphase flow in porous media including interphase boundaries. Adv. Water Resour. 13, 169–186 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanizadeh, S.M., Gray, W.G.: Thermodynamic basis of capillary pressure in porous media. Water Resour. Res. 29, 3389–3405 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilfer, R.: Macroscopic Capillarity and hysteresis for flow in porous media. Phys. Rev. E 73, 016307 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilfer, R., Doster, F.: Percolation as a basic concept for macroscopic capillarity. Transp. Porous Media 82, 507–519 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, A., Ewing, R.: Percolation theory of flows in porous media. Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Joekar-Niasar, V., Hassanizadeh, S.M.: Specific interfacial area: the missing state variable in two-phase flow equations? Water Resour. Res. 47, W05513 (2011). doi:10.1029/2010WR009291

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E.F., Bossler, D.P., Naumann, V.O.: Calculation of relative permeability from displacement experiments. Trans. AIME 216, 370–372 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalaydjian, F.: Origin and quantification of coupling between relative permeabilities for two-phase flow in porous media. Transp. Porous Media 5, 215–229 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalaydjian, F., Bourbiaux, B., Cuerillot, D.: Viscous coupling between fluid phase for two-phase flow in porous media: theory versus experiment. In: Proceedings of the fifth European Symposium on improved oil recovery, Budapest, 717–726 (1989)

  • Kurbanov, A. K.. In: Equations of two-phase liquid transport in porous media. Theory and Practice of Oil Reservoir Exploitation. Nedra, Moscow, 281–286 (1968) (in Russian)

  • Marle, C.M.: On macroscopic equations governing multiphase flow with diffusion and reactions in porous media. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 20, 643–662 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odeh, A.S.: Effect of viscosity ratio on relative permeability, paper SPE 1189. Pet. Trans. AIME 216, 346–353 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Panfilov, M., Panfilova, I.: Phenomenological meniscus model for two-phase flows in porous media. Transp. Porous Media 58, 87–119 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pau, G.S.H., Bell, J.B., Pruess, K., Almgren, A.S., Lijewski, M.J., Zhang, K.: High-resolution simulation and characterization of density-driven flow in \({\rm CO}_2\) storage in saline aquifers. Adv. Water Resour. 33, 443–455 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plohr, B., Marchesin, D., Bedrikovetsky, P.G., Krause, P.: Modeling hysteresis in porous media flow via relaxation. Comput. Geosci. 5, 225–256 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raats, P.A.C., Klute, A.: Transport in soils: the balance of momentum. Soil Sci. Sor. Am. Proc. 32, 452–456 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, W.: Attaching new meanings to the equations of Buckley and Leverett. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 1, 223–228 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, W.: Coupling coefficients for two-phase flow in pore spaces of simple geometry. Transp. Porous Media 5, 97–102 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, W.: Critical questions about the coupling hypothesis. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 5, 299–307 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seljakov, V.I., Kadet, V.V.: Percolation Models in Porous Media. Springer, Dordrecht (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A.A.: Statistical thermodynamics of disperse systems. Phys. A 232, 499–516 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A.A., Stenby, E.H.: Factorization of transport coefficients in macroporous media. Transp. Porous Media 41, 305–323 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shvidler, M.I.: Two-phase flow equations in porous media providing for the phase interaction. Izvestiia Akademii Nauk SSSR, Mekhanika, Mashinostroenie 1, 131–134 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui, S., Hicks, P.J., Ertekin, T.: Two-Phase relative permeability models in reservoir engineering calculations. Energy Sour. 21(1–2), 145–162 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Skauge, A., Ottesen, B. A.: A summary of experimentally derived relative permeability and residual saturation on North Sea reservoir cores. International symposium of core analysts, Monterey, California, pp. SCA2002-12, 22–26 Sept 2002

  • Valdes-Parada, F., Alberto Ohoa-Thapia, J., Alvarez-Ramirez, J.: On the effective viscosity for the Darcy–Brinkman equation. Phys. A 385, 69–79 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Dong, M., Asghari, K.: Effect of Oil Viscosity on Heavy-Oil/Water Relative Permeability Curves, Paper SPE 99763 Presented at the SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery. Tulsa, Oklahoma (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, E.W.: The dynamics of capillary flow. Bibcode 1921PhRv...17.273W. (1921) doi:10.1103/PhysRev.17.273

  • Wesselingh, J.A., Krishna, R.: Mass transfer in multicomponent mixtures. VSSD, Delft (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesselingh, J.A., Krishna, R.: Mass Transfer. Ellis Horwood, Chichester (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, B.K., Hassanizadeh, S.M.: An overview of biodegradation of LNAPLs in coastal (semi)-arid environment. Water Air Soil Pollut. 220, 225–239 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuster, S.T.: Theoretical Consideration of multiphase flows in idealized capillary systems. Proc. Third World Pet. Cong. 2, 437–445 (1951)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been carried out in the framework of the ADORE project sponsored by the Danish Council for Technology and Production (FTP). Application of the Maxwell–Stefan approach was inspired by long discussions with Professor Johannes Wesselingh. Professor Pavel Bedrikovetsky (University of Adelaide, Australia) is kindly acknowledged for multiple discussions and useful advices.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander A. Shapiro.

Appendix: Solution of the Brinkmann Problems for the Jet Model

Appendix: Solution of the Brinkmann Problems for the Jet Model

The solutions for the jet model should be obtained for four different cases (cf. Eqs. 29, 30). There are solutions for the outer and for the inner jet. The solutions should be obtained for \(s<s^{*}\) and for \(s>s^{*}\). If \(s<s^{*}\), the outer jet is orange, and the inner jet is white. For the case of \(s>s^{*}\), the colors exchange.

We will consider in detail the solution for the outer jet problem and for \(s<s^{*}\), so that the phase is orange. Other solutions will be briefly described.

The governing Brinkmann equation is

$$\begin{aligned} P_x =-\frac{\mu _o }{K_o }W_o +\frac{\mu _{eo} }{r}\frac{d}{dr}\left( r\frac{dW_o }{dr}\right) \end{aligned}$$

With the boundary conditions at the inner and outer boundaries of the jet,

$$\begin{aligned} W_o (r_j )=V,\quad \frac{dW_o }{dr}(R)=0 \end{aligned}$$
(37)

These boundary conditions correspond to the case where all the inner jets are active (\(I_P =0)\). For the case where some jets are passive, the first boundary condition should be substituted by \(W_o (r_j )=0\) for fraction \(I_P \) of the jets. This is a particular case of the first condition (37), with \(V=0\).

Let us first consider the case with no passive inner jets, \(I_P =0\). The effect of passive jets will be added later.

By substitutions

$$\begin{aligned} W_o =U-\frac{K_o }{\mu _o }P_x ; \quad r^{\prime }=r\big /\sqrt{K_o \gamma _o }, \end{aligned}$$

the equation considered is reduced to the zero-order modified Bessel equation as:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{r^{\prime }}\frac{d}{dr^{\prime }}\left( r^{\prime }\frac{dU}{dr^{\prime }}\right) -U=0 \end{aligned}$$

Solving it and making back-substitution, we express \(W_0 \) in the general form of

$$\begin{aligned} W_o =-\frac{K_o }{\mu _o }P_x +C_1 {I}_0 \left( r\big /\sqrt{K_o \gamma _o }\right) +C_2 {K}_0 \left( r\big /\sqrt{K_o \gamma _o }\right) \end{aligned}$$

Here, \({I}_0 ,\;{K}_0 \) are modified Bessel functions of the first and second kind, \(C_i \) are the constants to be determined from the boundary conditions (37). Substitution of the values \(r_j ,\;R\) into the solution and resolving with regard to these constants results in

$$\begin{aligned} C_1&= \frac{\hbox {K}_1 \left( R\big /\sqrt{K_o \gamma _o }\right) }{\Delta }\left( V+\frac{K_o }{\mu _o }P_x \right) ;\quad C_2 =\frac{\hbox {I}_1 \left( R\big /\sqrt{K_o \gamma _o }\right) }{\Delta }\left( V+\frac{K_o }{\mu _o }P_x \right) ;\; \\ \Delta&= \hbox {K}_0 \left( r_j \big /\sqrt{K_o \gamma _o }\right) \hbox {I}_1 \left( R\big /\sqrt{K_o \gamma _o }\right) +\hbox {K}_1 \left( R\big /\sqrt{K_o \gamma _o }\right) \hbox {I}_0 \left( r_j \big /\sqrt{K_o \gamma _o }\right) \end{aligned}$$

The first-order Bessel functions arise from the differentiation of the zero-order functions, as required by the second boundary condition (37).

The average velocity \(U_o \) is found as (cf. Eq. 21):

$$\begin{aligned} U_o =\frac{\phi }{R^{2}}\int _{r_j }^R {W_o 2rdr} \end{aligned}$$

Substitution of the solution \(W_0 \) and rather elaborate, but straightforward integration with application of the tabulated integrals of the type of \(\int {xI_0 (x)dx,\;\int {xK_0 (x)dx} } \) results in

$$\begin{aligned} U_o&= -\frac{K_o \phi (1-s)}{\mu _o }P_x +L_{oV} \left( \phi (1-s)V+\frac{K_o \phi (1-s)}{\mu _o }P_x \right) \nonumber \\ L_{oV}&= L_{oV} \left( \frac{r_j }{\sqrt{K_o \gamma _o }},\frac{R}{\sqrt{K_o \gamma _o }}\right) =\frac{2\sqrt{K_o \gamma _o }r_j \Delta _1 }{R^{2}(1-s)\Delta };\nonumber \\ \Delta&= \hbox {K}_0 \left( r_j\big /\sqrt{K_o \gamma _o }\right) \hbox {I}_1 \left( R\big /\sqrt{K_o \gamma _o }\right) +\hbox {K}_1 \left( R\big /\sqrt{K_o \gamma _o }\right) \hbox {I}_0 \left( r_j \big /\sqrt{K_o \gamma _o }\right) \nonumber \\ \Delta _1&= \hbox {I}_1 \left( \frac{R}{\sqrt{K_o \gamma _o }}\right) \hbox {K}_1 \left( \frac{r_j }{\sqrt{K_o \gamma _o }}\right) -\hbox {K}_1 \left( \frac{R}{\sqrt{K_o \gamma _o }}\right) \hbox {I}_1 \left( \frac{r_j }{\sqrt{K_o \gamma _o }}\right) \end{aligned}$$
(38)

This expression is equivalent to the first expression (29), with account of Eq. (26). It may be shown by manipulation with the Bessel functions that

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial \Delta }{\partial r_j }=-\frac{\Delta _1 }{\sqrt{K_o \gamma _o }};\quad \Delta _1 =-\sqrt{K_o \gamma _o }\frac{\partial \Delta }{\partial r_j } \end{aligned}$$

Thus, the expression for coefficient \(L_{oV} \) has the form of

$$\begin{aligned} L_{oV} =L_{oV} \left( \frac{r_j }{\sqrt{K_o \gamma _o }},\frac{R}{\sqrt{K_o \gamma _o }}\right) =-\frac{2K_o \gamma _o r_j }{R^{2}(1-s)\Delta }\frac{\partial \Delta }{\partial r_j }=-\frac{2K_o \gamma _o }{R^{2}(1-s)}\frac{\partial \ln \Delta }{\partial \ln r_j } \end{aligned}$$

Equation (38) has the form similar to Eq. (25). Comparison shows that for the case of no passive jets, \(L_{oV} =l_{oV} \). This proves the first of Eq. (29).

We have considered the case where all the inner jets are active \((I_P =0)\). If, on the contrary, all the inner jets would be passive \((I_P =1)\), the solution would be given by Eq. (38) with \(V=0\). The complete solution is the linear combination of the solutions with active and with passive inner jets

$$\begin{aligned} U_o&= (1-I_P )\left[ -\frac{K_o \phi (1-s)}{\mu _o }P_x +L_{oV} \left( \phi (1-s)V+\frac{K_o \phi (1-s)}{\mu _o }P_x \right) \right] \\&+\,I_P \left[ -(1-L_{oV} )\frac{K_o \phi (1-s)}{\mu _o }P_x \right] \end{aligned}$$

Comparison with Eq. (25) results in

$$\begin{aligned} k_o&= \frac{1-L_{oV} }{1-(1-I_P )L_{oV} }K_o \phi (1-s)\\ l_{oV}&= (1-I_P )L_{oV} \end{aligned}$$

The first equation provides the connection between the meso- and macroscale permeabilities for oil. It is not used for computations in the present work, but may be important for experimental studies. The second equation is the result mentioned at the end of Sect. 4.2.

The flow in the active inner part of the jet at \(s<s^{*}\) is described by the Brinkmann Eq. (27) with boundary conditions (28). Averaging is performed as above. The passive jets form the fraction of the volume where the flow velocity is zero. The resulting expression for the flow velocity is

$$\begin{aligned} U_w =-(1-I_P )\frac{K_w \phi s}{\mu _w }P_x +(1-I_P )L_{wV} \left( \phi sV+\frac{K_w \phi s}{\mu _w }P_x \right) , \end{aligned}$$

where \(L_{wV} \) is given by the formula equivalent to the second Eq. (29)

$$\begin{aligned} L_{wV} =\frac{2r_j \sqrt{K_w \gamma _w }}{sR^{2}}\hbox {I}_1 \left( \frac{r_j }{\sqrt{K_w \gamma _w }}\right) \Big /\hbox {I}_0 \left( \frac{r_j }{\sqrt{K_w \gamma _w }}\right) \end{aligned}$$

Comparison with Eq. (25) recovers equations

$$\begin{aligned} k_w&= \frac{(1-I_P )(1-L_{wV} )}{1-(1-I_P )L_{wV} }K_w \phi s;\\ l_{wV}&= (1-I_P )L_{wV} \end{aligned}$$

The case of \(s>s^{*}\) is considered in a similar way.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shapiro, A.A. Two-Phase Immiscible Flows in Porous Media: The Mesocopic Maxwell–Stefan Approach. Transp Porous Med 107, 335–363 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-014-0442-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-014-0442-0

Keywords

Navigation