Advertisement

Transport in Porous Media

, Volume 104, Issue 2, pp 363–383 | Cite as

A Condensation Heating Model for Evaluating Early-Period SAGD Performance

  • Lijuan Zhu
  • Fanhua ZengEmail author
Article
  • 265 Downloads

Abstract

In SAGD, it is important to obtain steam chamber conformance along the horizontal wellbore to shorten the ramp-up time and maximize economics. However, reservoir heterogeneity, wellbore undulation, and operation conditions make it hard to achieve this objective. This paper proposes a new method using a condensation temperature model to evaluate the steam chamber conformance of early-period SAGD by interpreting temperature falloff data. The initial temperature distribution of the model is categorized into three zones: a hot-zone of steam temperature, a cold-zone of reservoir temperature, and a transition-zone from steam temperature to reservoir temperature. All three zones are assumed to have circular shapes. This assumption is valid since the model focuses on the early stages of SAGD. The model takes into account the steam condensation on the chamber edge during shut-in, thereby being able to calculate the condensation-front (chamber edge) movement. A semi-analytical approach is developed to solve this model. Sensitivity analysis indicates that the sizes of the steam zone and transition zone, the observing location, and the thermal diffusivity of the formation directly affect the temperature behavior. The synthetic case study shows that the temperature falloffs from the condensation model and from simulation are in good agreement and suggests that the condensation model has the potential to estimate the chamber size during the early stages of SAGD, if calibrated to the field data. Because of the ready-to-use temperature data and the semi-analytic solution, the condensation model proposed in this paper can provide a quick and reliable estimation of the steam chamber size to help the engineers monitor and optimize the chamber development thereafter.

Keywords

SAGD Early-period Transient temperature analysis Condensation model 

Abbreviation

SAGD

Steam-assisted gravity drainage

TTA

Temperature transient analysis

List of symbols

\(T\)

Temperature in the cylinder as a function of time and space (\(^{\circ }\)C)

\(T_\mathrm{R}\)

The initial reservoir temperature (\(^{\circ }\)C)

\(T_\mathrm{s}\)

Steam temperature (\(^{\circ }\)C)

\(t\)

Time, day

\(R_\mathrm{w}\)

Wellbore radius

\(r\)

Radius from the location to the hot-zone center (m)

\(R_1\)

Outer radius of steam-zone (m)

\(R_2\)

Outer radius of the liquid-zone (m)

\(R_\mathrm{o}\)

Observing distance (m)

\(R_\mathrm{B} \)

The radius of condensation front (m)

\(C_\mathrm{{tS}}\)

Reservoir overall volumetric heat capacity in steam-zone (J/m\(^3\) \(^{\circ }\)C)

\(C_\mathrm{{tL}}\)

Reservoir overall volumetric heat capacity in liquid-zone (J/m\(^3\) \(^{\circ }\)C)

\(C_\mathrm{o} \)

Volumetric heat capacity of oil (J/m\(^3\) \(^{\circ }\)C)

\(C_\mathrm{w} \)

Volumetric heat water of oil (J/m\(^3\) \(^{\circ }\)C)

\(C_\mathrm{r} \)

Volumetric heat water of rock (J/m\(^3\) \(^{\circ }\)C)

\(K_\mathrm{{tS}}\)

Overall thermal conductivity of steam-zone (J /m day \(^{\circ }\)C)

\(K_\mathrm{{tL}} \)

Overall thermal conductivity of liquid-zone (J /m day \(^{\circ }\)C)

\(K_\mathrm{{L-r}} \)

Thermal conductivity of the mixture of rock and liquid (J /m day \(^{\circ }\)C)

\(K_\mathrm{{G-r}} \)

Thermal conductivity of the mixture of rock and gas (J /m day \(^{\circ }\)C)

\(K_\mathrm{o} \)

Thermal conductivity of oil (J /m day \(^{\circ }\)C)

\(K_\mathrm{w} \)

Thermal conductivity of water (J /m day \(^{\circ }\)C)

\(K_\mathrm{r} \)

Thermal conductivity of rock (J /m day \(^{\circ }\)C)

\(k_\mathrm{{tS}} =\frac{K_{tS} }{C_{tS} }\)

Overall thermal diffusivity of the steam-zone (m\(^{2}\)/\(^{\circ }\)C)

\(k_\mathrm{{tL}} =\frac{K_\mathrm{{tL}} }{C_\mathrm{{tL}} }\)

Overall thermal diffusivity of the liquid-zone (m\(^{2}\)/\(^{\circ }\)C)

\(q_\mathrm{1}\)

Heat flux on the inter-boundary in steam-zone (J /day)

\(T_\mathrm{1} \)

Temperature in the steam-zone

\(q_\mathrm{2}\)

Heat flux on the inter-boundary of liquid-zone (J /day)

\(T_\mathrm{2} \)

Temperature in the liquid-zone

\(\overline{T} \)

Temperature in Laplace space

s

Laplace space variable

\(I_n (x)\)

Modified bessel function of the 1st kind of the nth order

\(K_n (x)\)

Modified bessel function of the 2nd kind of the nth order

\(\rho _\mathrm{w} \)

Water density (kg/m\(^{3}\))

\(\rho _\mathrm{s} \)

Steam density (kg/m\(^{3}\))

\(L_\mathrm{s} \)

Latent heat of steam (J/kg)

\(\phi \)

Reservoir porosity

\(S_\mathrm{g} \)

The average gas saturation inside the steam chamber

Subscript

D

Dimensionless

p

Particular solution

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the financial support from the Petroleum Technology Research Centre and NSERC to Dr. Fanhua (Bill) Zeng.

References

  1. Anand, J., Somerton, W.H., Gomaa, E.: Predicting thermal conductivities of formation from other known properties. SPEJ 13, 267–273 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Birrell, G.E.: Heat transfer ahead of a SAGD steam chamber, a study of thermocouple data from phase B of the underground test facility (Dover Project). SPE-71503, pp. 1–13 (2001)Google Scholar
  3. Box, M.J.: A new method of constrained optimization and a comparison with other methods. Comput. J. 8(1), 42–52 (1965). doi: 10.1093/comjnl/8.1.42 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butler, R.M., Mcnab, G.S., Lo, H.Y.: Theoretical studies on the gravity drainage of heavy oil during steam heating. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 59(4), 455–460 (1981)Google Scholar
  5. Cenovus.: TL ULC Telephone Lake Project Volume 1—Project Description (2011)Google Scholar
  6. Duong A.N.: Thermal transient analysis applied to horizontal wells. Paper presented at the International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium, 20–23 October 2008, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. SPE 117435-MS. (2008). doi: 10.2118/117435-MS
  7. Duru, O.O., Horne, R.N.: Modeling reservoir temperature transients and reservoir-parameter estimation constrained to the model. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 13(6), 873–883 (2010). 115791-PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. STARS User’s Guide, version 2009.13, CMG (2009)Google Scholar
  9. Stehfest, H.: Algorithm 368: numerical inversion of Laplace transforms. Commun. ACM 13(1), 47 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Tanka, M., Endo, K., Onozuka, S.: Estimation of steam chamber extent using 4D seismic. J. Cryst. Process Technol. 49(5), 50–55 (2010). SPE137778-PA.Google Scholar
  11. Wang, H.Y.: Application of temperature observation wells during SAGD operations in a medium deep bitumen reservoir. J. Cryst. Process Technol. 48(11), 11–15 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. Yuh, S., Ravalec, M., Hubans, C., Lys, P., and Foulon, D., et al.: Feasibility study of time-lapse seismic monitoring of EOR with steam injection in a heavy oil field. Paper presented at the I.P.T.C., 7–9 Dec 2009, Doha, Qatar. SPE 13939 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. Zhu, L., Zeng, F., Zhao, G., Duong, A.: Using transient temperature analysis to evaluate steam circulation in SAGD start-up processes. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 100, 131–145 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Applied Science and EngineeringUniversity of ReginaReginaCanada

Personalised recommendations