Advertisement

Transport in Porous Media

, Volume 96, Issue 2, pp 295–304 | Cite as

Advective Transport in Heterogeneous Formations: The Impact of Spatial Anisotropy on the Breakthrough Curve

  • Antonio ZarlengaEmail author
  • Igor Janković
  • Aldo Fiori
Article

Abstract

Water flow and solute transport take place in formations of spatially variable conductivity K. The logconductivity Y = ln K is modeled as a random stationary space function, of normal univariate pdf (of mean In K G and variance \({\sigma_{Y}^{2}}\)) and of axisymmetric autocorrelation of integral scales I h,I v (anisotropy ratio f = I v/I h < 1). The head gradient and the velocity are uniform in the mean, parallel to bedding, and of constant and given as J and U, respectively. Transport is ruled by advection, which typically overwhelms pore scale dispersion in the breakthrough curve (BTC) determination. In the present study we analyze the impact of anisotropy f on the BTC of a passive solute, which is related to the mass flux μ (t, x) at a control plane at x. While a considerable body of literature dealt with weakly heterogeneous formations (\({\sigma _{Y}^{2} <1 }\)), the present study addresses the case of \({\sigma _{Y}^{2} >1 }\) , which is of interest for many aquifers and is more difficult to solve either numerically or by approximations. We approach the three dimensional problem by modeling the structure as an ensemble of densely packed oblate spheroids of semi-major and semi-minor axis R and f R, respectively, and independent lognormal K, submerged in a matrix of uniform conductivity K ef, the effective conductivity of the ensemble. The detailed numerical simulations of transport show that the BTC is insensitive to the value of the anisotropy ratio f, i.e., μ (t, x) I h/U depends only on \({\sigma _{Y}^{2}}\) (except for small differences in the tail). This important result implies that transport, as quantified by BTCs or spatial longitudinal mass distributions, can be modeled accurately by the much simpler solutions developed in the past for isotropic media, like e.g., the semi-analytical self-consistent approximation.

Keywords

Solute transport Heterogeneous porous formations Breakthrough curve Anisotropy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berglund S., Fiori A.: Influence of transverse mixing on the breakthrough of sorbing solute in a heterogeneous aquifer. Water Resour. Res. 33(3), 399–405 (1997). doi: 10.1029/96WR03686 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dagan G.: Solute transport in heterogeneous porous formations. J. Fluid Mech. 145, 151–177 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dagan G.: Flow and Transport in Porous Formations. Springer, Heidelberg (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fiori A.: Finite Peclet extensions of Dagan’s solutions to transport in anisotropic heterogeneous formations. Water Resour. Res. 32(1), 193–198 (1996). doi: 10.1029/95WR02768 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fiori, A., Janković, J., Dagan, G.: Modeling flow and transport in highly heterogeneous three-dimensional aquifers: ergodicity, Gaussianity, and anomalous behavior. Part 2: Approximate semianalytical solution. Water Resour. Res. 42, W06D13 (2006). doi: 10.1029/2005WR004752
  6. Fiori A., Janković J., Dagan G.: The impact of local diffusion upon mass arrival of a passive solute in transport through three-dimensional highly heterogeneous aquifers. Adv. Water Resour. 34, 1563–1573 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.08.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gelhar L.W.: Stochastic Subsurface Hydrology. Prentice Hall, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  8. Gelhar L.W., Axness C.L.: Three-dimensional stochastic analysis of macrodispersion in aquifers. Water Resour. Res. 19(1), 161–180 (1983). doi: 10.1029/WR019i001p00161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gutjahr A.L., Gelhar L.W.: Stochastic models of subsurface flow: infinite versus finite domains and stationarity. Water Resour. Res. 17, 337–350 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Janković I., Fiori A.: Analysis of the impact of injection mode in transport through strongly heterogeneous aquifers. Adv. Water Resour. 33, 1199–1205 (2010). doi: 10.1016/J.ADVWATRES CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Milton G.W.: Theory of Composites. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rubin Y.: Applied Stochastic Hydrogeology. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)Google Scholar
  13. Suribhatla R., Janković I., Fiori A., Zarlenga A., Dagan G.: Effective conductivity of anisotropic heterogeneous medium of random conductivity distribution. Multiscale Model. Simul. 9, 933–954 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zarlenga A., Fiori A., Soffia C., Janković I.: Flow velocity statistics for uniform flow through 3D anisotropic formations. Adv. Water Resour. 40, 37–45 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universita’ di Roma TreRomeItaly
  2. 2.State University of New York at BuffaloBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations