Advertisement

Transport in Porous Media

, Volume 95, Issue 3, pp 563–580 | Cite as

Prediction of Non-Darcy Coefficients for Inertial Flows Through the Castlegate Sandstone Using Image-Based Modeling

  • C. P. Chukwudozie
  • M. TyagiEmail author
  • S. O. Sears
  • C. D. White
Article

Abstract

Near wellbore flow in high rate gas wells shows the deviation from Darcy’s law that is typical for high Reynolds number flows, and prediction requires an accurate estimate of the non-Darcy coefficient (β factor). This numerical investigation addresses the issues of predicting non-Darcy coefficients for a realistic porous media. A CT-image of real porous medium (Castlegate Sandstone) was obtained at a resolution of 7.57 μm. The segmented image provides a voxel map of pore-grain space that is used as the computational domain for the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) based flow simulations. Results are obtained for pressure-driven flow in the above-mentioned porous media in all directions at increasing Reynolds number to capture the transition from the Darcy regime as well as quantitatively predict the macroscopic parameters such as absolute permeability and β factor (Forchheimer coefficient). Comparison of numerical results against experimental data and other existing correlations is also presented. It is inferred that for a well-resolved realistic porous media images, LBM can be a useful computational tool for predicting macroscopic porous media properties such as permeability and β factor.

Keywords

Non-Darcy flow Forchheimer equation Image-based modeling Lattice Boltzmann method Castlegate sandstone 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arns C.H., Knackstedt M.A., Val Pinczewski W., Martys N.S.: Virtual permeametry on microtomographic images. J. Petroleum Sci. Eng. 45, 41–46 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakke, S., Øren, P.E.: 3-D pore-scale modeling of sandstones and flow simulations in the pore networks. SPE 35479 (1997)Google Scholar
  3. Balhoff M.T., Wheeler M.F. A predictive pore scale model for non-Darcy flow in anisotropic porous media. SPE 110838 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. Barree, R.D, Conway, M.W.: Beyond beta factors: A complete model for Darcy, Forchheimer, and trans-Forchheimer flow in porous media. SPE 89325 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. Chen S., Martinez D.: On boundary conditions in the lattice Boltzmann methods. Phys. Fluids 8(9), 2527–5236 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chukwudozie, C.P.: Pore-scale Lattice Boltzmann simulations of inertial flows in realistic porous media: a first principle analysis of the forchheimer relationship. MS Thesis, Petroleum Engineering Department, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge (2011)Google Scholar
  7. De Santo M., Liguori C., Paolillo A., Pietrosanto A.: Standard uncertainty evaluation in image-based measurements. Measurement 36, 347–358 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dullien F.A.L.: Porous Media—Fluid Transport and Pore Structure. Academic Press, San Diego (1979)Google Scholar
  9. Ferreol B., Rothman D.H.: Lattice-Boltzmann simulations of flow through Fontainebleau porous media. Transp. Porous Media 20(1–2), 3–20 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fourar M., Radilla G., Lenormand R., Moyne C.: On the non-linear behavior of a laminar single-phase flow through two and three-dimensional porous media. Adv. Water Resour. 27, 669–677 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Galehouse, J.S.: Point counting. In: Carver, R.E. (ed.) Procedures in Sedimentary Petrology. Wiley Interscience, New York, pp. 385–407 (1971)Google Scholar
  12. Geerstma J.: Estimating the coefficient of inertial resistance in fluid flow through porous media. SPEJ 4706, 445–448 (1974)Google Scholar
  13. Garrouch A.A., Ali L.: Predicting the onset of inertial effects in sandstone rocks. Transp. Porous Media 44, 487–505 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Green L. Jr., Duwez P.: Fluid flow through porous medium. J. Appl. Mech. 18, 39–45 (1951)Google Scholar
  15. Huang, H., Ayoub, J.: Applicability of the Forchheimer equation for non-Darcy flow in porous media. SPE 102715 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. Jeong N., Choi D.H., Lin C.L.: Prediction of Darcy–Forchheimer drag for micro-porous structures of complex geometry using the lattice Boltzmann method. J. Micromech. Microeng. 16, 2240–2250 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jonas, L.: OpenLB user guide. Release 0.4 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. Jones, S.C.: Using the inertial coefficient, β, to characterize heterogeneity in reservoir rock. SPE 16949 (1987)Google Scholar
  19. Li, D., Engler, T.W.: Literature review on correlations of the non-Darcy coefficient. In: Proceedings of the SPE Permian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Conference, Midland, Texas, 15–17 May 2001Google Scholar
  20. Ma H., Ruth D.W.: The microscopic analysis of high Forchheimer number flow in porous media. Transp. Porous Media 13, 139–160 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Newman, M., Yin, X.L.: Lattice Boltzmann simulation of non-Darcy flow in stochastically generated 2D porous media geometries. SPE 146689 (2011)Google Scholar
  22. Purcell W.R.: Capillary pressures—their measurement using mercury and the calculation of permeability therefrom. Trans. AIME 186, 39–48 (1949)Google Scholar
  23. Renard P., Genty A., Stauffer F.: Laboratory determination of the full permeability tensor. J. Geophys. Res. 106(811), 26443–26452 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sukop M.C., Thorne D.T.: Lattice Boltzmann Modeling—An Introduction for Geoscientists and Engineers. Springer, Berlin (2005)Google Scholar
  25. Taud H., Martinez-Angeles R., Parrot J.F., Hernandez-Escobedo L.: Porosity estimation method by X-ray computed tomography. J. Petroleum Sci. Eng. 47, 209–217 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Whitaker S.: The Forchheimer equation—a theoretical development. Transp. Porous Media 25, 27–61 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zeng Z., Grigg R.: A criterion for non-Darcy flow in porous media. Transp. Porous Media 63, 57–69 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zou Q., He X.: On pressure and velocity boundary conditions for the lattice Boltzmann BGK model. Phys. Fluids 9, 1591–1598 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. P. Chukwudozie
    • 1
  • M. Tyagi
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • S. O. Sears
    • 1
  • C. D. White
    • 1
  1. 1.The Craft and Hawkins Department of Petroleum EngineeringLouisiana State University and A&M CollegeBaton RougeUSA
  2. 2.Center for Computation and TechnologyLouisiana State University and A&M CollegeBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations