Transport in Porous Media

, Volume 92, Issue 1, pp 165–185 | Cite as

Efficient Algorithms for Modeling the Transport and Biodegradation of Chlorinated Ethenes in Groundwater

  • Itza Mendoza-Sanchez
  • Jeffrey CunninghamEmail author


Predicting the fate of chlorinated ethenes in groundwater requires the solution of equations that describe both the transport and the biodegradation of the contaminants. Here, we present a model that accounts for (1) transport of chlorinated ethenes in flowing groundwater, (2) mass transfer of contaminants between mobile groundwater and stationary biofilms, and (3) diffusion and biodegradation within the biofilms. Equations for biodegradation kinetics account for biomass growth within the biofilms, the effect of hydrogen on dechlorination, and competitive inhibition between vinyl chloride and cis–dichloroethene. The overall model consists of coupled, non-linear, partial differential equations; solution of such a model is challenging and requires innovative numerical algorithms. We developed and tested two new numerical algorithms to solve the equations in the model; these are called system splitting with operator splitting (SSOS) and system splitting with Picard iteration (SSPI). We discuss the conditions under which one of these algorithms is superior to the other. The contributions of this paper are as follows: first, we believe that the mathematical model presented here is the first transport model that also accounts for diffusion and non-linear biodegradation of chlorinated ethenes in biofilms; second, the SSOS and SSPI are new computational algorithms developed specifically for problems of transport, mass transfer, and non-linear reaction; third, we have identified which of the two new algorithms is computationally more efficient for the case of chlorinated ethenes; and finally, we applied the model to compare the biodegradation behavior under diffusion-limited, metabolism-limited, and hydrogen-limited (donor-limited) conditions.


PCE TCE DCE Porous media Bioremediation Advection Dispersion Reaction kinetics 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. An Y.-J., Kampbell D.H., Weaver J.W., Wilson J.T., Jeong S.-W.: Natural attenuation of trichloroethene and its degradation products at a lake-shore site. Environ. Pollut. 130, 325–335 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson L.V., Harley P.J., Hudson J.D.: Numerical Methods with Fortran 77: A Practical Introduction. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham (1989)Google Scholar
  3. Bae W., Odencrantz J.E., Rittmann B.E., Valocchi A.J.: Transformation kinetics of trace-level halogenated organic contaminants in a biologically active zone (BAZ) induced by nitrate injection. J. Contam. Hydrol. 6, 53–68 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagley D.M.: Systematic approach for modeling tetrachloroethene biodegradation. J. Environ. Eng. (ASCE) 124, 1076–1086 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baveye P., Valocchi A.: An evaluation of mathematical models of the transport of biologically reacting solutes in saturated soils and aquifers. Water Resour. Res. 25, 1413–1421 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ballapragada B.S., Stensel H.D., Puhakka J.A., Ferguson J.F.: Effect of hydrogen on reductive dechlorination of chlorinated ethenes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31, 1728–1734 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beranger S.C., Sleep B.E., Sherwood-Lollar B., Perez-Monteagudo F.: Transport, biodegradation and isotopic fractionation of chlorinated ethenes: Modeling and Parameter estimation methods. Adv. Water Resour. 28, 87–98 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carrayrou J., Moisé R., Behra P.: Operator-splitting procedures for reactive transport and comparison of mass balance errors. J. Contam. Hydrol. 68, 239–268 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Celia M.A., Bouloutas E.T., Zarba R.L.: A general mass-conservative numerical solution for the unsaturated flow equation. Water Resour. Res. 26, 1483–1496 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chambon J.C., Broholm M.M., Binning P.J., Bjerg P.L.: Modeling multi-component transport and enhanced anaerobic dechlorination processes in a single fracture-clay matrix system. J. Contam. Hydrol. 112, 77–90 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiang C.Y., Dawson C.N., Wheeler M.F.: Modeling of in situ biorestoration of organic compounds in groundwater. Transp. Porous Med. 6, 667–702 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clement T.P., Sun Y., Hooker B.S., Petersen J.N.: Modeling multispecies reactive transport in ground water. Ground Water Monit. Remediat. 18(2), 79–92 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clement T.P., Johnson C.D., Sun Y.W., Klecka G.M., Bartlett C.: Natural attenuation of chlorinated ethene compounds: Model development and field-scale application at the Dover site. J. Contam. Hydrol. 42, 113–140 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crittenden J.C., Hutzler N.J., Geyer D.G., Oravitz J.L., Friedman G.: Transport of organic compounds with saturated groundwater flow: Model development and parameter sensitivity. Water Resour. Res. 22(3), 271–284 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cunningham J.A., Mendoza-Sanchez I.: Equivalence of two models for biodegradation during contaminant transport in groundwater. Water Resour. Res. 42, W02416 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cupples A.M., Spormann A.M., McCarty P.L.: Vinyl chloride and cis-dichloroethene dechlorination kinetics and microorganism growth under substrate limiting conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38, 1102–1107 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dillon R., Fauci L.: A microscale model of bacterial and biofilm dynamics in porous media. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 68(5), 536–547 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eberl H.J., Picioreanu C., Heijnen J.J., van Loosdrecht M.C.M.: A three-dimensional numerical study on the correlation of spatial structure, hydrodynamic conditions, and mass transfer and conversion in biofilms. Chem. Eng. Sci. 55, 6209–6222 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. El-Farhan Y.H., Scow K.M., de Jonge L.W., Rolston D.E., Moldrup P.: Coupling transport and biodegradation of toluene and trichloroethylene in unsaturated soils. Water Resour. Res. 34, 437–445 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fennell D.E., Gossett J.M.: Modeling the production of and competition for hydrogen in a dechlorinating culture. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32, 2450–2460 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haest P.J., Springael D., Smolders E.: Modelling reactive CAH transport using batch experiment degradation kinetics. Water Res. 44, 2981–2989 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hammond G.E., Valocchi A.J., Lichtner P.C.: Application of Jacobian-free Newton-Krylov with physics-based preconditioning to biogeochemical transport. Adv. Water Resour. 28, 359–376 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoelen T.P., Cunningham J.A., Hopkins G.D., Lebron C.A., Reinhard M.: Bioremediation of cis-DCE at a sulfidogenic site by amendment with propionate. Ground Water Monit. Remediat. 26(3), 82–91 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hossain A., Corapcioglu M.Y.: Modeling primary substrate controlled biotransformation and transport of halogenated aliphatics in porous media. Transp. Porous Med. 24(2), 203–220 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaluarachchi J.J., Morshed J.: Critical assessment of the operator-splitting technique in solving the advection-dispersion-reaction equation: 1. First-order reaction. Adv. Water Resour. 18, 89–100 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kasten P.R., Lapidus L., Amundson N.R.: Mathematics of adsorption in beds: V. Effect of intraparticle diffusion in flow systems in fixed beds. J. Phys. Chem. 56(6), 683–688 (1952)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lanser D., Verwer J.G.: Analysis of operator splitting for advection-diffusion-reaction problems from air pollution modeling. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 111, 201–216 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lensing H.J., Vogt M., Herrling B.: Modeling of biologically mediated redox processes in the subsurface. J. Hydrol. 159, 125–143 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lu X.J., Sun Y.W., Petersen J.N.: Analytical solutions of TCE transport with convergent reactions. Transp. Porous Med. 51, 211–225 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. MacQuarrie K.T.B., Sudicky E.A.: Multicomponent simulation of wastewater derived nitrogen and carbon in shallow unconfined aquifers: I. Model formulation and performance. J. Contam. Hydrol. 47, 53–84 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mendoza-Sanchez, I.: Effects of pore-scale velocity and pore-scale physical processes on contaminant biodegradation during transport in groundwater: Modeling and experiments. Ph.D. Dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas (2007)Google Scholar
  32. Mendoza-Sanchez I., Cunningham J.: Efficient algorithm for modeling transport in porous media with mass exchange between mobile fluid and reactive stationary media. Transp. Porous Med. 68, 285–300 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mendoza-Sanchez I., Autenrieth R.L., McDonald T.J., Cunningham J.A.: Effect of pore velocity on biodegradation of cis-dichloroethene (DCE) in column experiments. Biodegradation 21, 365–377 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nash J.E., Sutcliffe J.V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—a discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 10(3), 282–290 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rasmuson A., Neretnieks I.: Exact solution of a model for diffusion in particles and longitudinal dispersion in packed beds. AIChE J. 26(4), 686–690 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rittmann B.E.: The significance of biofilms in porous media. Water Resour. Res. 29, 2195–2202 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rittmann B.E., VanBriesen J.M.: Microbiological processes in reactive modeling. In: Lichtner, P.C., Steefel, C.I., Oelkers, E.H. (eds) Reactive Transport in Porous Media, vol. 34. Reviews in Mineralogy, pp. 311–334. Mineralogical Society of America, Chantilly, VA (1996)Google Scholar
  38. Rosen J.B.: Kinetics of a fixed bed system for solid diffusion into spherical particles. J. Chem. Phys. 20(3), 387–394 (1952)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schaefer C.E., Callaghan A.V., King J.D., McCray J.E.: Dense nonaqueous phase liquid architecture and dissolution in discretely fractured sandstone blocks. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43(6), 1877–1883 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schaefer C.E., Towne R.M., Vainberg S., McCray J.E., Steffan R.J.: Bioaugmentation for treatment of dense non-aqueous phase liquid in fractured sandstone blocks. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44(13), 4958–4964 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sun Y., Lu X., Petersen J.N., Buscheck T.A.: An analytical solution of tetrachloroethylene transport and biodegradation. Transp. Porous Med. 55, 301–308 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tompson A.F.B., Knapp R.B., Hanna M.L., Taylor R.T.: Simulation of TCE migration and biodegradation in a porous medium under conditions of finite degradation capacity. Adv. Water Resour. 17, 241–249 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Valocchi A.J., Malmstead M.: Accuracy of operator splitting for advection-dispersion-reaction problems. Water Resour. Res. 28, 1471–1476 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Williamson K., McCarty P.L.: A model of substrate utilization by bacterial films. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 48, 9–24 (1976)Google Scholar
  45. Yu S.H., Dolan M.E., Semprini L.: Kinetics and inhibition of reductive dechlorination of chlorinated ethylenes by two different mixed cultures. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 195–205 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zysset A., Stauffer F., Dracos T.: Modeling of reactive groundwater transport governed by biodegradation. Water Resour. Res. 30(8), 2423–2434 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Escuela Superior de Ingeniería y Arquitectura, Instituto Politécnico NacionalMexico CityMexico
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringTufts UniversityMedfordUSA
  3. 3.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations