Advertisement

Transport in Porous Media

, 76:407 | Cite as

Mathematical Model of Coalbed Gas Flow with Klinkenberg Effects in Multi-Physical Fields and its Analytic Solution

  • Guozhong HuEmail author
  • Hongtu Wang
  • Xiaogang Fan
  • Zhigang Yuan
  • Song Hong
Article

Abstract

The deep-mining coal seam impacted by high in situ stress, where Klinkenberg effects for gas flow were very obvious due to low gas permeability, could be regarded as a porous and tight gas-bearing media. Moreover, the Klinkenberg effects had a significant effect on gas flow behavior of deep-mining coal seam. Based on the gas flow properties of deep-mining coal seams affected by in situ stress field, geothermal temperature field and geo-electric field, a new mathematical model of coalbed gas flow, which reflected the impact of Klinkenberg effects on coalbed gas flow properties in multi-physical fields, was developed by establishing the flow equation, state equation, and continuity equation and content equation of coalbed gas. The analytic solution was derived for the model of one-dimensional steady coalbed gas flow with Klinkenberg effects affected by in situ stress field and geothermal temperature field, and a sensitivity analysis of its physical parameters was carried out by comparing available analytic solutions and the measured values. The results show that the analytic solutions of this model of coalbed gas flow with Klinkenberg effects are closer to the measured values compared to those without Klinkenberg effects, and this model can reflect more accurately gas flow of deep-mining coal seams. Moreover, the analytic solution of this model is more sensitive to the change of Klinkenberg factor b and temperature grad G than depth h.

Keywords

Porous media Klinkenberg effects Multi-physical fields Mathematical model of coalbed gas flow Analytic solution 

Nomenclature

A

Ash of coal

a

Langmuir volume parameter, m3 kg−1

B

Moisture of coal

b

Klinkenberg factor, Pa

c

Langmuir pressure parameter, Pa−1

C1, C2

Integral constant

D0

Gas diffusion coefficient when the pore pressure equals p 0

d

Average coal micro-grain size of coal seam, m

div

Divergence of a vector

E

Electric intensity

grad

Gradient of a scalar

h

Depth, m

Kg

Gas permeability of coal, m2

K

Absolute gas permeability under very high pressure, m2

k0σ

Value of K σ (0) when effective stress σ equals zero

k0T

Value of K T (0) when the temperature of coal theoretically equals zero

L

Oblique length of coal seam, L = h/sin θ, m

m

Methane content reserved in the unit volume coal, m3 m−3

m0

Gas content in coal seam at initial time t 0, m3 m−3

ma

Absorbed gas content in coal seam, m3 m−3

md

Desorbable average gas content in coal seam, m3 m−3

mf

Free gas content, m3 m−3

n

Outward unit normal vector on the domain boundary

p

Gas pressure, p = (p 1 + p 2)/2, MPa

p1, p2

Gas pressure of top and bottom of coal sample respectively, Pa

ph

Gas pressure calculated with Klinkenberg effects, MPa

p´h

Gas pressure calculated without Klinkenberg effects, MPa

pH

Gas pressure measured, MPa

p0

Initial gas pressure, MPa

Δp

Gas pressure difference, MPa

R

Universal gas constant, J kmol−1 K−1

T

Absolute temperature of coalbed gas, °C

T0

Temperature of air, °C

Ta

Temperature of coal, °C

ΔT

Geothermal temperature increment

t

Time, s

v

Gas flow velocity vector, m s−1

α1

Klinkenberg effects coefficient

α2, α3

Experimental constant

α4

Experimental constant

β

Compressibility factor of gas

β0

Compressibility factor of gas under standard atmosphere, generally equals one

βa

Compressibility factor when the temperature of coal equals T a

ø

Porosity of coal

ø0

Porosity of coal without the impact of loads under a norm temperature

λ1

Bulk compressibility factor of coal

λ2

Heat swelling factor of coal

μg

Gas dynamic viscosity, Pas

ρ

Gas density, kg m−3

ρc

Density of coal, kg m−3

σ

Effective stress, MPa

σ1

Axial pressure of three-axis loading, Pa

σ3

Confining pressure of three-axis loading, Pa

Γ

In situ stress, MPa

Δσ

Effective stress increment

θ

Obliquity of coal seam, °

References

  1. Bear J. (1972) Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. American Elsevier Publishing Co. Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Chan D.Y.C., Hughes B.D. (1993). Transient gas flow around the boreholes. Transp. Porous Media 10: 137–152 doi:  10.1007/BF00617005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen, R.D.: Research on the law and prediction of coalbed gas emission in deep mining. Dissertation, Chongqing University (1996)Google Scholar
  4. Harpalani S. (1984) The effect of gas evacuation on coal permeability test specimens. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 21: 361–364 doi:  10.1016/0148-9062(84)91534-1 Google Scholar
  5. Jones F.O., Owens W.W. (1980) A laboratory study of low permeability gas sands. J. Pet. Technol. 32: 1631–1640Google Scholar
  6. Klinkenberg, L.J.: The Permeability of Porous Media to Liquids and Gases. In: Drilling and Production Practices. American Petroleum Institute, New York (1941)Google Scholar
  7. Liang B., Liu J.J., Fan H.B. (2000) The mathematical model and its numerical solution of gas flow under unequal temperatures. Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 19: 1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Liu J.J., Liu X.G., Hu Y.R. (2003) Study on nonlinear seepage of rock of low permeability. Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 22: 556–561Google Scholar
  9. Saghafi, A.: Numerical simulation of coalbed gas flow and its application in the prediction of gas emission and extracting gas. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Symposium on Mining Science and Safety Technology. China Coal Industry Publisher House, Beijing (1987)Google Scholar
  10. Skjetne E., Auriault J.L. (1999) Homogenization of wall-slip gas flow through porous media. Transp. Porous Media 36: 293–306 doi: 10.1023/A:1006572324102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Somerton W.H. (1974) Effect of stress on permeability of coal. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 12: 129–145 doi: 10.1016/0148-9062(75)91244-9 Google Scholar
  12. Sun P.D. (1991) Study of the dynamic models for coal gas dynamics (part 1). Min. Sci. Technol. 12: 17–25 doi:  10.1016/0167-9031(91)91501-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sun P.D., Ling Z.Y. (2000) Experimental study of the law for permeability of coal under action of 3-triaxial compression. J. Chongqing Univ. 23: 28–31. Natural Science EditionGoogle Scholar
  14. Tan X.S., Xian X.F. (1994) Research on the permeability of coal. J. Xi’an Min. Inst. 14: 22–25Google Scholar
  15. Ville A.D. (1998). On the properties of compressible gas flow in a porous media. Transp. Porous Media 22: 287–306 doi: 10.1007/BF00161628 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang H.T., Xian X.F., Yin G.Z., et al. (1999) Investigation of analytic method for coalbed gas pressure in high temperature and deeply mining mines. J. China Coal Soc. 24: 279–283Google Scholar
  17. Wang H.T., Du Y.G., Xian X.F., et al. (2002a) Seepage equation of coalbed gas in geophysical field. Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 21: 644–646Google Scholar
  18. Wang H.T., Xian X.F., Du Y.G., et al. (2002b) Analytic method of calculating gas content in coal seams in deep mining. J. China Univ. Min. Technol. 31: 367–369Google Scholar
  19. Wang Q., Zhang L.H., Qian Z.J., et al. (2003) Mathematical model of low and very low permeability gas reservoir considering Klinkenberg effect. Nat. Gas Ind. 23: 100–103Google Scholar
  20. Wang H.T., Li X.H., Xian X.F., et al. (2004) Testing study on seepage properties of methane gas in coal under the action of geo-electric field. Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 23: 303–306Google Scholar
  21. Wu Y.S., Pruess K., Persoff P. (1998). Gas flow in porous media with Klinkenberg effects. Transp. Porous Media 32: 117–137 doi: 10.1023/A:1006535211684 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Xiao X.C., Pan Y.S. (2005) Mathematical model and numerical simulation of coalbed methane percolation flow equation considering slippage effects. Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 24: 2966–2970Google Scholar
  23. Zhao Y.S. (1994) Coupled mathematical model on coal mass-methane and its numerical method. Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 13: 229–239Google Scholar
  24. Zhou S.N. (1990) Mechanism of gas flow in coal seams. J. China Coal Soc. 15: 61–67Google Scholar
  25. Zhu W.C., Liu J., Sheng J.C., Elsworth D. (2007). Analysis of coupled gas flow and deformation process with desorption and Klinkenberg effects in coal seams. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 44: 971–980 doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.11.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guozhong Hu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hongtu Wang
    • 1
  • Xiaogang Fan
    • 1
  • Zhigang Yuan
    • 1
  • Song Hong
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Lab for Exploitation of China Southwestern Resources & Environmental Disaster Control Engineering, Ministry of EducationChongqing UniversityChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations