Advertisement

Transport in Porous Media

, Volume 68, Issue 2, pp 175–185 | Cite as

A new method for calculating hysteretic K(S) relationship

  • G. Kargas
  • P. KerkidesEmail author
  • A. Poulovassilis
Origina lPaper

Abstract

A new method for calculating the hysteretic relationship between hydraulic conductivity (K) and suction (S) is proposed. This method uses the experimental (KS) data of the main wetting and drying branches and predicts satisfactorily the scanning drying and wetting curves. The proposed method is applicable to those porous media where the hysteretic Θ–S relationship complies with the independent domain concept.

Keywords

Hydraulic conductivity Capillary hysteresis Scanning curve Distribution function 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hogarth W.L., Hopmans J., Parlange J.-V., Haverkamp R. (1988) Application of a simple soil–water hysteresis model. J. Hydrol. 98, 21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kacimov A.R., Yakimov N.D. (1997) Nonmonotonic moisture profile as a solution of Richards’ equation for soils with conductivity hysteresis. Adv. Water Resour. 21(8):691–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kaluarachchi J.J., Parker J.C. (1987) Effects of hysteresis with air entrapment on water flow in the unsaturated zone. Water Resour. Res. 23(10):1967–1976Google Scholar
  4. Kargas G., Kekides P. (2005) Hysteretic Θ(S) prediction: comparison of two models. Trasp. Porous Med. 59, 97–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kool J.B., Parker J.C. (1987) Development and evaluation of closed-form expressions for hysteretic soil hydraulic properties. Water Resour. Res. 23, 105–114Google Scholar
  6. Lehmann P., Stauffer F., Hinz C., Dury O., Fluhler H. (1998) Effect of hysteresis on water flow in a sand column with a fluctuating capillary fringe. J. Contaminant Hydrol. 33(1–2):81–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lenhard R.J., Parker J.C., Kaluarachchi J.J. (1991) Comparing simulated and experimental hysteretic two-phase transient fluid flow phenomena. Water Resour. Res. 27(8):2113–2124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mualem Y. (1973) Modified approach to capillary hysteresis based on a similarity hypothesis. Water Resour. Res. 9, 1324–1331Google Scholar
  9. Mualem Y. (1974) A conceptual model of hysteresis. Water Resour. Res. 10, 514–520Google Scholar
  10. Mualem Y. (1976a) A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour. Res. 12, 513–522Google Scholar
  11. Mualem Y. (1976b) Hysteretical models for prediction of the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour. Res. 12, 1248–1254Google Scholar
  12. Mualem Y. (1984) A modified dependent-domain theory of hysteresis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 137, 283–291Google Scholar
  13. Parlange J.Y. (1976) Capillary hysteresis and the relationship between drying and wetting curves. Water Resour. Res. 12, 224–228Google Scholar
  14. Philip J.R. (1964) Similarity hypothesis for capillary hysteresis in porous materials. J. Geophys. Res. 69, 1553–1562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pickens J.F., Gillham R.W. (1980) Finite element analysis of solute transport under hysteretic unsaturated flow conditions. Water Resour. Res. 16:1071–1078Google Scholar
  16. Poulovassilis A. (1962) Hysteresis of pore water, an application of concept of independent domains. Soil Sci. 93, 405–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Poulovassilis A., Childs E.E. (1971) The hysteresis of pore water: the non-independence of domains. Soil Sci. 112, 301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Poulovassilis A. (1969) The effect of hysteresis of pore water on the hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci. 20, 52–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Poulovassilis A. (1970) Hysteresis of pore water in granular porous bodies. Soil Sci. 93, 405–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Poulovassilis A., Kargas G. (2000) A note on calculating hysteretic behaviour. Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64, 1947–1950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Poulovassilis A., Tzimas E. (1974) The hysteresis in the relationship between hydraulic conductivity and suction. Soil Sci. 117, 250–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stauffer, F.: Hysteretic unsaturated flow modelling. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on Hydroinformatics, Hydroinformatics 1996, pp. 589–595. Zurich, Switzerland. Balkema, Rotterdam (1996)Google Scholar
  23. Topp G.C., Miller E.E. (1966) Hysteretic moisture characteristics and hydraulic conductivities for glass-beads media. Soil Sci. 30, 156–162Google Scholar
  24. Ustohal P., Stauffer F., Dracos T. (1998) Measurement and modelling of hydraulic characteristics of unsaturated porous media with mixed wettability. J. Contaminant Hydrol. 33, 5–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Agricultural University of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations