Abstract
The utilization of temporary immersion system-bioreactors (TIB) has shown promise for sugarcane micropropagation due to its capacity for high-yield seedlings production. However, the temporary immersion system also carries the risk of somaclonal variations (SV) in regenerated plants. SV, encompassing phenotypic changes resulting from genetic or epigenetic alterations, and it presents challenges in preserving the genetic uniformity of the seedlings, a crucial factor for sugarcane productivity. A molecular marker like Simple Sequence Repeats (SSR) offers a reliable means to assess the genetic stability of TIB-derived sugarcane seedlings, ensurinng that the temporary immersion system-based micropropagation produces true-to-type planting materials. In this study, SSR analysis was conducted to determine the relative genetic stability of TIB-derived sugarcanes, using 15 SSR markers, generating over 200 DNA fragments ranging from 150 to 4,000 bp in size. The genetic stability was calculated as the Jaccard’s similarity index of the SSR patterns of TIB-derived sugarcanes compared to their mother plants. The genetic stability varied between 92 and 96% in three Indonesian sugarcane varieties (PSKA 942, PS 094, and PS 091) which is relatively high considering the high cell mass multiplication in TIB (up to 30 multiplies). Morphological observations in the field also revealed no differences between TIB-derived sugarcane and their mother plants, convincing the true-to-type of micropropagation products. This study demonstrated the high relative genetic stability of TIB-derived sugarcanes, paving the way for large-scale commercial application in plantations.
Key message
Genetic stability test using SSR markers revealed that a high yield micropropagation of sugarcane using TIB produced true-to-type sugarcane seedlings, also confirmed by the morphological uniformity on the field observations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The datasets generated or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Abass MH, Al-Utbi SD, Al-Samir EARH (2017) Genotoxicity assessment of high concentrations of 2,4-D, NAA and Dicamba on date palm callus (Phoenix dactylifera L.) using protein profile and RAPD markers. J Genetic Eng Biotechnol 15:287–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JGEB.2016.12.003
Abdelsalam NR, Grad WE, Ghura NSA et al (2021) Callus induction and regeneration in sugarcane under drought stress. Saudi J Biol Sci 28:7432–7442. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SJBS.2021.08.047
Abdullah S, Khan. FA, et al (2013) Detection of somaclonal variation in micropropagated plants of sugarcane and SCMV screening through ELISA. J Agric Sci 5:199. https://doi.org/10.5539/JAS.V5N4P199
Aitken KS, Li J-C, Jackson P et al (2006) AFLP analysis of genetic diversity within Saccharum officinarum and comparison with sugarcane cultivars. Aust J Agric Res 57:1167–1184. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR05391
Alfalahi AO, Hussein ZT, Khalofah A et al (2022) Epigenetic variation as a new plant breeding tool: a review. J King Saud Univ Sci 34:102302. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JKSUS.2022.102302
Azizi AAA, Roostika I, Efendi D, Besar Penelitian dan Pengembangan Bioteknologi dan Sumber Daya Genetik, Pertanian B (2020) Analysis of genetic stability of micropropagated sugarcane in different subculture frequencies using SSR marker. Jurnal Penelitian Tanaman Industri 26:49–57. https://doi.org/10.21082/jlittri.v26n1.2020.49-57
Azu E, Elegba W, Asare AT et al (2022) Efficient callus-mediated system for commercial production of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) planting material in Ghana. Afr J Biotechnol 21:208–217. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2021.17440
Baklouti E, Beulé T, Nasri A et al (2022) 2,4-D induction of somaclonal variations in in vitro grown date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L. Cv Barhee). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 150:191–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11240-022-02259-8/METRICS
Bello-Bello JJ, Mendoza-Mexicano M, Pérez- Sato JA et al (2018) In vitro propagation of sugarcane for certified seed production. In: Sugarcane - Technology and Research. IntechOpen
Chen D, Shao Q, Yin L et al (2019a) Polyamine function in plants: metabolism, regulation on development, and roles in abiotic stress responses. Front Plant Sci 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPLS.2018.01945
Chen YM, Huang JZ, Hou TW, Pan IC (2019b) Effects of light intensity and plant growth regulators on callus proliferation and shoot regeneration in the ornamental succulent Haworthia. Bot Stud 60:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40529-019-0257-Y
Chengalrayan K, Gallo-Meagher M (2001) Effect of various growth regulators on shoot regeneration of sugarcane. Vitro Cell Dev Biology - Plant 37:434–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11627-001-0076-0/METRICS
Chickarmane VS, Gordon SP, Tarr PT et al (2012) Cytokinin signaling as a positional cue for patterning the apical-basal axis of the growing Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:4002–4007. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.1200636109/SUPPL_FILE/SM02.MPG
De Carlo A, Tarraf W, Lambardi M et al (2021) Temporary immersion system for production of biomass and bioactive compounds from medicinal plants. Agronomy 11:2414. https://doi.org/10.3390/AGRONOMY11122414
Debnath SC, Ghosh A (2022) Phenotypic variation and epigenetic insight into tissue culture berry crops. Front Plant Sci 13:1042726. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPLS.2022.1042726/BIBTEX
Devarumath RM, Kalwade SB, Kawar PG, Sushir KV (2012) Assessment of genetic diversity in sugarcane germplasm using ISSR and SSR markers. Sugar Tech 14:334–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12355-012-0168-7/METRICS
dos Santos JM, Duarte Filho LSC, Soriano ML et al (2012) Genetic diversity of the main progenitors of sugarcane from the RIDESA germplasm bank using SSR markers. Ind Crops Prod 40:145–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INDCROP.2012.03.005
Duarte-Aké F, De-la-Peña C (2021) High cytokinin concentration and nutrient Starvation trigger DNA methylation changes in somaclonal variants of Agave angustifolia Haw. Ind Crops Prod 172:114046. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INDCROP.2021.114046
Eeckhaut T, Van Houtven W, Bruznican S et al (2020) Somaclonal variation in Chrysanthemum × morifolium protoplast regenerants. Front Plant Sci 11:607171. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPLS.2020.607171/BIBTEX
Eeuwens CJ, Lord S, Donough CR et al (2002) Effects of tissue culture conditions during embryoid multiplication on the incidence of mantled flowering in clonally propagated oil palm. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 70:311–323. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016543921508/METRICS
Ferreira M, dos Rocha S, de Nascimento A dos S, et al (2023) The role of somaclonal variation in plant genetic improvement: a systematic review. Agronomy 13:730. https://doi.org/10.3390/AGRONOMY13030730/S1
Fickett ND, Ebrahimi L, Parco AP et al (2020) An enriched sugarcane diversity panel for utilization in genetic improvement of sugarcane. Sci Rep 10:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70292-8
Garcia C, Furtado de Almeida AA, Costa M et al (2019) Abnormalities in somatic embryogenesis caused by 2,4-D: an overview. Plant Cell, tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 2019. 137(2):193–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11240-019-01569-8
García-Ramírez Y (2023) Temporary immersion system for in vitro propagation via organogenesis of forest plant species. Trees - Structure and Function 37:611–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00468-022-02379-W/METRICS
Gupta S, Singh A, Yadav K et al (2022) Micropropagation for multiplication of disease-free and genetically uniform sugarcane plantlets. Advances in plant tissue culture: current developments and future trends. Academic Press, pp 31–49
Hsie B, Brito J, Vila Nova M et al (2015) Determining the genetic stability of micropropagated sugarcane using inter-simple sequence repeat markers. Genet Mol Res 14:17651–17659. https://doi.org/10.4238/2015.December.21.38
Krishna H, Alizadeh M, Singh D et al (2016) Somaclonal variations and their applications in horticultural crops improvement. 3 Biotech 6:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13205-016-0389-7
Li YC, Korol AB, Fahima T, Nevo E (2004) Microsatellites within genes: structure, function, and evolution. Mol Biol Evol 21:991–1007. https://doi.org/10.1093/MOLBEV/MSH073
Manchanda P, Kaur A, Gosal SS (2018) Somaclonal variation for sugarcane improvement. Biotechnologies of Crop Improvement. Springer International Publishing, pp 299–326
Medeiros C, Almeida Balsalobre TW, Carneiro MS (2020) Molecular diversity and genetic structure of Saccharum complex accessions. PLoS ONE 15. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0233211
Meyer GM, Banasiak M, Ntoyi TT et al (2009) Sugarcane plants from temporary immersion culture: acclimating for commercial production. Acta Hortic 812:323–328. https://doi.org/10.17660/ACTAHORTIC.2009.812.45
Mirani AA, Teo CH, Markhand GS et al (2020) Detection of somaclonal variations in tissue cultured date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) using transposable element-based markers. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 141:119–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11240-020-01772-Y/METRICS
Mordocco AM, Brumbley JA, Lakshmanan P (2008) Development of a temporary immersion system (RITA®) for mass production of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. interspecific hybrids). In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant 2008 45:4 45:450–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11627-008-9173-7
Mostafa HHA, Wang H, Song J, Li X (2020) Effects of genotypes and explants on garlic callus production and endogenous hormones. Sci Rep 10:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61564-4
Mostafiz SB, Wagiran A, Johan NS et al (2018) The effects of temperature on callus induction and regeneration in selected Malaysian rice cultivar Indica. Sains Malays 47:2647–2655. https://doi.org/10.17576/JSM-2018-4711-07
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with Tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1399-3054.1962.TB08052.X
Murthy HN, Joseph KS, Paek KY, Park SY (2023) Bioreactor systems for micropropagation of plants: present scenario and future prospects. Front Plant Sci 14:1159588. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPLS.2023.1159588/BIBTEX
Nevins DJ (1995) Sugars: their origin in photosynthesis and subsequent biological interconversions. Am J Clin Nutr 61. https://doi.org/10.1093/AJCN/61.4.915S
Nguyen THN, Winkelmann T, Debener T (2020) Genetic analysis of callus formation in a diversity panel of 96 rose genotypes. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 142:505–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11240-020-01875-6/TABLES/4
Ong-Abdullah M, Ordway JM, Jiang N et al (2015) Loss of Karma transposon methylation underlies the mantled somaclonal variant of oil palm. Nature 525:533–537. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15365
Pandey RN, Singh SP, Rastogi J, Sharma ML (2012) Early assessment of genetic fidelity in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) plantlets regenerated through direct organogenesis with RAPD and SSR markers | Australian Journal of Crop Science. Aust J Crop Sci 6:618–624
Pawełkowicz ME, Skarzyńska A, Mróz T et al (2021) Molecular insight into somaclonal variation phenomena from transcriptome profiling of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) lines. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 145:239–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11240-020-02005-Y/FIGURES/10
Reis RS, Vale E, de Heringer M AS, et al (2016) Putrescine induces somatic embryo development and proteomic changes in embryogenic callus of sugarcane. J Proteom 130:170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPROT.2015.09.029
Rohlf FJ (2009) NTSYS-pc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System Version 2.2 getting started guide. Applied Biostatistics, Inc., New York
Ruzin SE (2000) Plant microtechnique and microscopy. In: Chaffey NJ (ed) The New Phytologist. Cambridge University Press, pp 57–58
Sáez PL, Bravo LA, Sánchez-Olate M et al (2016) Effect of photon flux density and exogenous sucrose on the photosynthetic performance during in vitro culture of Castanea sativa. Am J Plant Sci 7:2087–2105. https://doi.org/10.4236/AJPS.2016.714187
Saleem Y, Emad MZ, Ali A, Naz S (2022) Synergetic effect of different plant growth regulators on micropropagation of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) by callogenesis. Agriculture 12:1812. https://doi.org/10.3390/AGRICULTURE12111812/S1
Salokhe S (2021) Development of an efficient protocol for production of healthy sugarcane seed cane through Meristem culture. J Agric Food Res 4:100126. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAFR.2021.100126
Saptari RT, Riyadi I, Sinta MM et al (2022) Determination of the optimum initial callus weight for the efficient propagation of sugarcane in temporary immersion bioreactor. Menara Perkeb 90:98–108. https://doi.org/10.22302/IRIBB.JUR.MP.V90I2.505
Sarla N, Neeraja CN, Siddiq EA (2005) Use of anchored (AG)n and (GA)n primers to assess genetic diversity of Indian landraces and varieties of rice. Curr Sci 89:1371–1381
Sathish D, Theboral J, Vasudevan V et al (2020) Exogenous polyamines enhance somatic embryogenesis and Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation efficiency in sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid). Vitro Cell Dev Biology - Plant 56:29–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11627-019-10022-6/METRICS
Shankar C, Ganapathy A, Manickavasagam M (2011) Influence of polyamines on shoot regeneration of sugarcane (Saccharum Officinalis. L). Egypt J Biology 13:44–50. https://doi.org/10.4314/EJB.V13I1.7
Sharma MD, Dobhal U, Singh P et al (2014) Assessment of genetic diversity among sugarcane cultivars using novel microsatellite markers. Afr J Biotechnol 13:1444–1451. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2013.13376
Singh RK, Mishra K, Singh P et al (2010) Evaluation of microsatellite markers for genetic diversity analysis among sugarcane species and commercial hybrids. Aust J Crop Sci 4:115–124
Singh P, Singh SP, Tiwari AK, Sharma BL (2017) Genetic diversity of sugarcane hybrid cultivars by RAPD markers. 3 Biotech 7:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13205-017-0855-X/METRICS
Singh RB, Mahenderakar MD, Jugran AK et al (2020) Assessing genetic diversity and population structure of sugarcane cultivars, progenitor species and genera using microsatellite (SSR) markers. Gene 753:144800. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GENE.2020.144800
Solangi SK, Qureshi ST, Khan IA, Raza S (2016) Establishment of in vitro callus in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) varieties influenced by different auxins. Afr J Biotechnol 15:1541–1550. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2015.14836
Thorat AS, Sonone NA, Choudhari VV et al (2017) Plant regeneration from cell suspension culture in Saccharum officinarum L. and ascertaining of genetic fidelity through RAPD and ISSR markers. 3 Biotech 7:16. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13205-016-0579-3
Tiwari A, Mishra N, Tripathi S et al (2011) Assessment of genetic stability in micro propagated population of sugarcane variety CoS 07250 through SSR markers. Vegetos- An International Journal of Plant Research 24:75–81
Toutenhoofd SL, Garcia F, Zacharias DA et al (1998) Minimum CAG repeat in the human calmodulin-1 gene 5′ untranslated region is required for full expression. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Struct Expression 1398:315–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4781(98)00056-6
Wu J, Wang Q, Xie J et al (2019) SSR marker-assisted management of parental germplasm in sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids) breeding programs. Agronomy 9:449. https://doi.org/10.3390/AGRONOMY9080449
Wu J, Chang X, Li C et al (2022) QTLs related to rice callus regeneration ability: localization and effect verification of qPRR3. Cells 11:4125. https://doi.org/10.3390/CELLS11244125/S1
Xiong H, Chen Y, Gao SJ et al (2022) Population structure and genetic diversity analysis in sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids) and six related Saccharum species. Agronomy 12:412. https://doi.org/10.3390/AGRONOMY12020412/S1
Zhang W, Wang Y, Diao S et al (2021) Assessment of epigenetic and phenotypic variation in Populus nigra regenerated via sequential regeneration. Front Plant Sci 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPLS.2021.632088/FULL
Zhang H, Lin P, Liu Y et al (2022) Development of SLAF-sequence and multiplex SNaPshot panels for population genetic diversity analysis and construction of DNA fingerprints for sugarcane. Genes (Basel) 13:1477. https://doi.org/10.3390/GENES13081477/S1
Zhao M, Shu G, Hu Y et al (2023) Pattern and variation in simple sequence repeat (SSR) at different genomic regions and its implications to maize evolution and breeding. BMC Genomics 24:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12864-023-09156-0/FIGURES/8
Acknowledgements
This work is part of the project “Automatization and scale up production of the superior sugarcane clonal seedlings in the Temporary Immersion Bioreactor”, funded by the Indonesian Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP-RI) through the grant research of RISPRO Invitasi 2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
RTS conducted experiments and carried out data analysis on the sugarcane micropropagation, prepared graphs, figures, and manuscript; AAA conducted experiments and carried out data analysis on the genetic stability assessment, and prepared the manuscript; YS conducted experiments on the DNA preparation and prepared the manuscript; IR supervised the sugarcane TIB culture; HM conceptualized and supervised the genetic stability assessment; SL provided and prepared the sugarcane plant materials for all experiments, and conducted field observation; MERBP conducted micropropagation initiation and acclimatization; MMS conducted histological analysis; SS conceptualized the research design on the sugarcane micropropagation, evaluated and edited the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The study did not involve human participants or animal objects.
Additional information
Communicated by Jericó Jabín Bello-Bello.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Saptari, R.T., Aksa, A.A., Riyadi, I. et al. Genetic stability analysis of the temporary immersion bioreactors–derived sugarcane seedlings with simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 156, 22 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-023-02657-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-023-02657-6