Skip to main content
Log in

Half-high blueberry plants from bioreactor culture display elevated levels of DNA methylation polymorphism

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Blueberry (Vaccinium spp. L.) plants exhibit high potential of regeneration via adventitious shoot formation on a semi-solid medium followed by shoot elongation in a liquid medium under bioreactor systems. To find out whether DNA methylation plays a role during shoot elongation, we compared DNA methylation level in the regenerants of two in vitro-grown half-high blueberry (V. corymbosum L. × V. angustifolium Ait.) cultivars Patriot and Chippewa on a semi-solid medium (SSM) in glass bottles and in a liquid medium in temporary immersion bioreactors (TIB), via methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphism (MSAP) technique. The SSM was separately fortified with various combinations of two plant growth regulators, zeatin and thidiazuron for shoot regeneration but elongation was carried out using the same medium under both SSM and TIB systems with only zeatin. Zeatin at 9.2 µM produced the maximum shoots in SSM and TIB for both cultivars, which varied from 30 to 33 in SSM and from 28 to 29 in TIB for Patriot and Chippewa, respectively. However, shoots proliferated in TIB were more vigorous. Noticeable changes in the methylation profiles were detected using MSAP in the regenerants grown in each type of culture system. The TIB system exhibited a significant increase in total methylation percentage (47–50%) in comparison to SSM (25–32%) in both cultivars. Similarly, the plants regenerated from TIB system were more polymorphic than those from SSM system. We describe here the effects of culture in vitro on DNA methylation that induced during the process of shoot elongation in two half-high blueberry cultivars.

Key message

In vitro shoot culture was achieved in half-high blueberry cultivars using a semi-solid and a liquid medium; plantlets developed from liquid medium showed higher level of DNA methylation alterations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Arnholdt-Schmitt B, Herterich S, Neumann K (1995) Physiological aspects of genome variability in tissue culture. I. Growth phase- dependent differential DNA methylation of the carrot genome (Daucus carota L.) during primary culture. Theoret Appl Genetics 91:809–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00220964

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bassam BJ, Caetano-Anollés G, Gresshoff PM (1991) Fast and sensitive silver staining of DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Anal Biochem 196:80–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty D, Yu KW, Paek KY (2003) Detection of DNA methylation changes during somatic embryogenesis of Siberian ginseng (Eleuterococcus senticosus). Plant Sci 165:61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00127-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chwialkowska K, Nowakowska U, Mroziewicz A, Szarejko I, Kwasniewski M (2016) Water-deficiency conditions differently modulate the methylome of roots and leaves in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). J Exp Bot 67:1109–1121. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv552

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cokus SJ et al. (2008) Shotgun bisulphite sequencing of the Arabidopsis genome reveals DNA methylation patterning. Nature 452:215–219. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v452/n7184/suppinfo/nature06745_S1.html

  • Debnath SC (2005) Micropropagation of lingonberry: influence of genotype, explant orientation, and overcoming TDZ-induced inhibition of shoot elongation using zeatin. HortScience 40:185–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Debnath SC (2005) Two- step procedure for adventitious shoot regeneration from in vitro- derived lingonberry leaves: shoot induction with TDZ and shoot elongation using zeatin. HortScience 40:189–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Debnath SC (2007) Strategies to propagate Vaccinium nuclear stocks for the Canadian berry industry. Can J Plant Sci 87:911–922

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Debnath SC (2009) Scale-up system for lowbush blueberry micropropagation using a bioreactor. HortScience 44:1962–1966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debnath SC (2011) Adventitious shoot regeneration in a bioreactor system and EST-PCR based clonal fidelity in lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.). Sci Hortic 128:124–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Debnath SC (2016) Genetic diversity and erosion in berries. In: Ahuja MR, Mohan Jain S (eds) Genetic diversity and erosion in plants. Springer, Cham, pp 75–129

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Debnath SC (2017) Temporary immersion and stationary bioreactors for mass propagation of true-to-type highbush, half-high, and hybrid blueberries (Vaccinium spp.). J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 92:72–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Debnath SC, McRae KB (2001) In vitro culture of lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) the influence of cytokinins and media types on propagation. Small Fruits Rev 1:3–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fan S, Jian D, Wei X, Chen J, Beeson RC, Zhou Z, Wang X (2017) Micropropagation of blueberry ‘Bluejay’ and ‘Pink Lemonade’ through in vitro shoot culture. Sci Hortic 226:277–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.08.052

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fulneček J, Kovařík A (2014) How to interpret methylation sensitive amplified polymorphism (MSAP) profiles? BMC Genet 15:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh A, Igamberdiev A, Debnath S (2017) Detection of DNA methylation pattern in thidiazuron-induced blueberry callus using methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphism. Biol Planta 61:511–519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh A, Igamberdiev AU, Debnath SC (2018) Thidiazuron-induced somatic embryogenesis and changes of antioxidant properties in tissue cultures of half-high blueberry plants. Sci Rep 8:16978. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35233-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Goyali JC, Igamberdiev AU, Debnath SC (2018) DNA methylation in lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.) propagated by softwood cutting and tissue culture. Can J Plant Sci 98:1035–1044

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh CL (1999) In vivo activity of murine de novo methyltransferases, Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b. Mol Cell Biol 19:8211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huetteman CA, Preece JE (1993) Thidiazuron: a potent cytokinin for woody plant tissue culture. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 33:105–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaeppler SM, Phillips RL (1993) DNA methylation and tissue culture-induced variation in plants. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 29:125–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karim R, Nuruzzaman M, Khalid N, Harikrishna JA (2016) Importance of DNA and histone methylation in in vitro plant propagation for crop improvement: a review. Ann Appl Biol 169:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin P, Scowcroft W (1981) Somaclonal variation—a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theoret Appl Genetics 60:197–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02342540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Law JA, Jacobsen SE (2010) Establishing, maintaining and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants and animals. Nature Rev Genet 11:204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levin R, Vasil I (1989) An integrated and automated tissue culture system for mass propagation of plants. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 25:21–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin C, Wang R, Jauh G (1988) Enhancement of callus formation on grape single bud cuttings by thidiazuron. In: Proceedings of the VI International Symposium on Growth Regulators in Fruit Production vol 239, pp 129–132

  • LoSchiavo F et al (1989) DNA methylation of embryogenic carrot cell cultures and its variations as caused by mutation, differentiation, hormones and hypomethylating drugs. Theoret Appl Genet 77:325–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305823

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan Jain S (2001) Tissue culture- derived variation in crop improvement. Euphytica 118:153–166. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004124519479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murthy B, Murch S, Saxena P (1998) Thidiazuron: A potent regulator of in vitro plant morphogenesis. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 34:267–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02822732

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neelakandan AK, Wang K (2012) Recent progress in the understanding of tissue culture-induced genome level changes in plants and potential applications. Plant Cell Rep 31:597–620

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paek K, Chakrabarty D, Hahn E (2005) Application of bioreactor systems for large scale production of horticultural and medicinal plants. In: Hvoslef-Eide AK, Preil W (eds) Liquid culture systems for in vitro plant propagation. Springer, New York, pp 95–116

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Park S, Murthy H, Chakrabarthy D, Paek K (2009) Detection of epigenetic variation in tissue- culture- derived plants of Doritaenopsis by methylation- sensitive amplification polymorphism (MSAP) analysis. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 45:104–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-008-9166-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peraza-Echeverria S, Herrera-Valencia VA, Kay AJ (2001) Detection of DNA methylation changes in micropropagated banana plants using methylation- sensitive amplification polymorphism (MSAP). Plant Sci 161:359–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(01)00421-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preece JE (2010) Micropropagation in stationary liquid media. Propag Ornam Plants 10:183–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyna-Lopez GE, Simpson J, Ruiz-Herrera J (1997) Differences in DNA methylation patterns are detectable during the dimorphic transition of fungi by amplification of restriction polymorphisms. Mol Gen Genet 253:703–710

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rival A et al (2013) Variations in genomic DNA methylation during the long-term in vitro proliferation of oil palm embryogenic suspension cultures. Plant Cell Rep 32:359–368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland LJ, Alkharouf N, Darwish O, Ogden EL, Polashock JJ, Bassil NV, Main D (2012) Generation and analysis of blueberry transcriptome sequences from leaves, developing fruit, and flower buds from cold acclimation through deacclimation. BMC Plant Biol 12:46. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-12-46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Skoog F, Miller CO (1957) Chemical regulation of growth and organ formation in plant tissue cultured. In Vitro Symp Soc Exp Biol 11:118–131

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smýkal P, Valledor L, Rodriguez R, Griga M (2007) Assessment of genetic and epigenetic stability in long-term in vitro shoot culture of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Plant Cell Rep 26:1985–1998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teisson C, Alvard D (1995) A new concept of plant in vitro cultivation liquid medium: temporary immersion. In: Terzi M, Cella R, Falavigna A (eds) Current issues in plant molecular and cellular biology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 105–110

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Kloet SP (1988) The genus Vaccinium in North America. vol 1828. Agriculture Canada.

  • Vos P et al (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucl Acids Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/23.21.4407

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong L, Xu C, Maroof MS, Zhang Q (1999) Patterns of cytosine methylation in an elite rice hybrid and its parental lines, detected by a methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphism technique. Mol Gen Genet 261:439–446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This is an Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) St. John’s Research and Development Centre Contribution No. 244. The authors are thankful to Darryl Martin and Glenn Chubs for their excellent technical help. All the experiments have been done in St. John’s Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.

Funding

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada St. John’s Research and Development Centre Contribution Number 244.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AG conceived the idea, designed the study, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared the tables and figures, and wrote the original manuscript. AUI participated in study design and revised the manuscript. SCD conceptualized, designed, managed and supervised the study, and reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samir C. Debnath.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

This research did not involve any human participants and/or animals.

Additional information

Communicated by Pamela J. Weathers.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghosh, A., Igamberdiev, A.U. & Debnath, S.C. Half-high blueberry plants from bioreactor culture display elevated levels of DNA methylation polymorphism. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 146, 269–284 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-021-02067-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-021-02067-6

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Samir C. Debnath