Skip to main content
Log in

Generation of chemically induced mutations using in vitro propagated shoot tip tissues for genetic improvement of fruit trees

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mutagenesis via treatment of seeds with chemical mutagens such as ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) has been widely used for crop improvement. However, this approach is not suitable for some crop species such as clonally propagated crops and allogamous perennial plants characteristically with high levels of genome heterozygosity and a long life cycle. Here, we report direct treatment of in vitro-induced peach shoot tip tissues with EMS for generation of mutations in peach, a perennial, woody fruit tree. We optimized EMS dosage and exposure time and found that treatment of the explants with 0.2 % EMS for 16 h was optimal for generation of genetic variations. So far we have generated nearly 2000 peach seedlings. Typical EMS-induced phenotypic variations were present in the seedlings. Next generation sequencing and subsequent data analyses were performed to monitor the efficiency of mutagenesis. The mutation rate was estimated to be one mutation per 150 kilobase pairs in the mutagenized population, suggesting effectiveness of this method in inducing mutagenesis in peach. Taken together, our data open an avenue for the generation of mutant populations suitable for crop improvement in allogamous perennial plants including fruit trees and clonally propagated plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Abbreviations

BAQ:

Base alignment quality

BRM:

Bud reactivation medium

DD:

Damage degree

DMSO:

Dimethyl sulfoxide

EMS:

Ethyl methanesulfonate

ENU:

Ethylnitrosourea

IBA:

Indol butyric acid

LR:

Lethal rate

NGS:

Next generation sequencing

qPCR:

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction

RPM:

Revolutions per minute

SIM:

Shoot induction medium

SNP:

Single nucleotide polymorphism

References

  • Byrne D, Raseira M, Bassi D, Piagnani M, Gasic K (2012) Peach. In: Badenes ML, Byrne DH (eds) Fruit breeding. Springer, New York, pp 505–569

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco B, Meisel L, Gebauer M, Garcia-Gonzales R, Silva H (2013) Breeding in peach, cherry and plum: from a tissue culture, genetic, transcriptomic and genomic perspective. Biol Res 46:219–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper J, Till BJ, Laport RG, Darlow MC, Kleffner JM et al (2008) TILLING to detect induced mutations in soybean. BMC Plant Biol 8:9

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Durbin R (2009) Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25(14):1754–1760

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J et al (2009) The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25(16):2078–2079

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moran NA, McLaughlin HJ, Sorek R (2009) The dynamics and time scale of ongoing genomic erosion in symbiotic bacteria. Science 323:37–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • San B, Li Z, Hu Q, Reighard GL, Luo H (2015) Adventitious shoot regeneration from in vitro cultured leaf explants of peach rootstock Guardian® is significantly enhanced by silver thiosulfate. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 120:757–765

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sciuchetti LA, Born AE (1965) Effect of dimethylsulfoxide alone and combined with N-dimethylaminosuccinamic acid (B995) or (2-chloroethyl) trimethylammonium chloride (CCC) on the growth and alkaloid biosynthesis of Datum tatula. J Pharm Sci 64:285–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikora P, Chawade A, Larsson M, Olsson J, Olsson O (2011) Mutagenesis as a tool in plant genetics, functional genomics, and breeding. Int J Plant Genom article# 314829

  • Smith DR, Quinlan AR, Peckham HE, Makowsky K, Tao W et al (2008) Rapid whole-genome mutational profiling using next-generation sequencing technologies. Genome Res 18:1638–1642

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Talebi AB, Talebi AB, Shahrokhifar B (2012) Ethyl methane sulphonate (EMS) induced mutagenesis in Malaysian rice (cv. MR219) for lethal dose determination. Am J Plant Sci 3:1661–1665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Till BJ, Cooper J, Tai TH, Colowit P, Greene EA, Henikoff S, Comai L (2007) Discovery of chemically induced mutations in rice by TILLING. BMC Plant Biol 7:19

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verde I, Abbott AG, Scalabrin S, Jung S, Shu S et al (2013) The high-quality draft genome of peach (Prunus persica) identifies unique patterns of genetic diversity, domestication and genome evolution. Nat Genet 24:1–10

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to Anna Xu for sharing peach tissue culture work, to Jamie McNeil for technical assistance, and to Brad Arbon for plant care in orchard. This work was supported by the Plum Pox Management and Monitoring Program (PPMMP), the Government of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aiming Wang.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 20 kb)

Supplementary Figure S1

An overview of the steps involved in generation of an ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) mutagenized population of peach trees (TIFF 893 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 23 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elhiti, M., Wang, H., Austin, R.S. et al. Generation of chemically induced mutations using in vitro propagated shoot tip tissues for genetic improvement of fruit trees. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 124, 447–452 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-015-0894-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-015-0894-0

Keywords

Navigation