Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative analysis of the development and quality of nursery plants derived from somatic embryogenesis and from seedlings for large-scale propagation of coffee (Coffea arabica L.)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plants of Coffea arabica L. derived via somatic embryogenesis, namely, somaclones, were evaluated with C. arabica seedlings grown in the nursery. At the time of their transfer to the nursery, somaclones of C. arabica cvs. Caturra and Costa Rica 95 (Catimor) were smaller and less vigorous than seedlings of the same cultivars. Following an initial slow growth for a period of 10 weeks, somaclones began to grow faster than seedlings until both groups of plants were equal in size at 21 weeks (entire duration of growth in the nursery). Comparisons of aerial and root systems of 30-cm long somaclones and seedlings of two cultivars revealed that plants of somaclones were more vigorous than seedlings, based on the higher number of leaves (13–16 vs. 9), larger leaf area (1060–1280 vs. 730–890 cm2), and greater dry weight of aerial organs (8.5–12 vs. 7.0–7.5 g). For cv. Caturra, the root dry weight of somaclones was significantly greater than that of seedlings (2.7 vs. 1.9 g) and was attributable to the large diameter roots (>0.5 mm). Analysis of 176,000 F1 hybrid somaclones revealed that these exhibited more heterogeneous growth than did the seedlings derived from zygotic embryos; moreover, there was a genotype effect. Almost 9–20% of somaclones required an additional 3–4 months of growth in the nursery, and 8–12% were culled for other undesirable horticultural attributes. Only 0.10–0.23% of somaclones displayed variant phenotypes. The observed somaclone vigor in the nursery was carried over to field performance as these plants were more precocious than seedlings and yielded coffee beans 1 year earlier than seedlings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ameha M (1983) Heterosis in crosses of indigenous coffee selected for yield and resistance to coffee berry disease. I. First breeding stage. Acta Hortic 140:155–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Attree SM, Moore D, Sawhney VK, Fowke LC (1991) Enhanced maturation and desiccation tolerance of white spruce [Picea glauca (Moench) Voss] somatic embryos: effects of a non-plamolysing water stress and abscisic acid. Ann Bot 68:519–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry-Etienne D, Bertrand B, Vásquez N, Etienne H (1999) Direct sowing of Coffea arabica somatic embryos mass-produced in a bioreactor and regeneration of plants. Plant Cell Rep 19:111–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry-Etienne D, Bertrand B, Schlongvoïgt A, Etienne H (2002a) The morphological variability within a population of coffee somatic embryos produced in a bioreactor affects the regeneration and the development of plants in the nursery. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 68:153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry-Etienne D, Bertrand B, Vásquez N, Etienne H (2002b) Comparison of somatic embryogenesis-derived coffee (Coffea arabica L.) plantlets regenerated in vitro or ex vitro conditions: morphological, mineral and water characteristics. Ann Bot 90:77–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand B, Etienne H, Cilas C, Charrier A, Baradat P (2005) Coffea arabica hybrid performance for yield, fertility and bean weight. Euphytica 141:255–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carman JG (1988) Improved somatic embryogenesis in wheat by partial simulation of the in ovulo oxygen, growth regulator and desiccation environments. Planta 175:417–424

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Côte FX, Folliot M, Domergue R, Dubois C (2000) Field performance of embryogenic cell suspension-derived banana plants (Musa AAA, cv. Grande naine). Euphytica 112:245–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ducos JP, Alenton R, Reano JF, Kanchanomai C, Deshayes A, Pétiard V (2003) Agronomic performance of Coffea canephora P. trees derived from large-scale somatic embryo production in liquid medium. Euphytica 131:215–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dussert S, Davey MW, Laffargue A, Doulbeau S, Swennen R, Etienne H (2006) Oxidative stress, phospholipids loss and lipid hydrolysis during drying and storage of intermediate seeds. Physiol Plant 127:192–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Etienne H (2005) Protocol of somatic embryogenesis: coffee (Coffea arabica L. and C. canephora P.). In: Jain SM, Gupta PK (eds) Protocols for somatic embryogenesis in woody plants. Series: Forestry sciences, vol 77. Springer SBS, Dordrecht, pp 167–179

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Etienne H, Bertrand B (2001) The effect of the embryogenic cell suspension micropropagation technique on the trueness to type, field performance, bean biochemical content and cup quality of Coffea arabica trees. Tree Physiol 21:1031–1038

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Etienne H, Solano W, Pereira A, Bertrand B, Berthouly M (1997) Coffee in vitro plantlet acclimatization protocol. Plantations Rech Dév 4:304–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossnickle SC, Major JE, Folk RS (1994) Interior spruce seedlings compared with emblings produced from somatic embryogenesis. 1. Nursery development, Fall acclimation, and over-winter storage. Can J For Res 24:1376–1384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaligot E, Beulé T, Rival A (2002) Methylation-sensitive RFLPs: characterisation of two oil palm markers showing somaclonal variation-associated polymorphism. Theor Appl Genet 104:1263–1269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marum L, Rocheta M, Maroco J, Margarida Oliveira M, Miguel C (2009) Analysis of genetic stability at SSR loci during somatic embryogenesis in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster). Plant Cell Rep 28:673–682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montes S (1982) Comportamiento en el vivero de plantulas de Coffea arabica L. variedad Caturra, obtenidas mediente el cultivo in Vitro de embriones. Cultivos Trop 1:93–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nsangou M, Greenwood M (1998) Physiological and morphological differences between somatic, in vitro germinated, and normal seedlings of red spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.). Can J For Res 28:1088–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill GA, Russell JH, Hooge BD, Ott PK, Hawkins CBD (2005) Estimating gains from genetic tests of somatic emblings of interior spruce. For Genet 12:57–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Teisson C, Alvard D (1995) A new concept of plant in vitro cultivation liquid medium: temporary immersion. In: Terzi M et al (eds) Current issues in plant molecular and cellular biology. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 105–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Vossen HAM, Walyaro DJ (1981) The coffee breeding programme in Kenya: a review of progress made since 1971 and plan of action for the coming years. Kenya Coffee 46:113–130

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Patrick Caroll (CNRS, France) and Carlos Quirós (UCDAVIS, USA) for critically reviewing the manuscript. Andrea Menéndez-Yuffá wishes to thank the Consejo de Desarrollo Científico y Humanístico, Universidad Central de Venezuela for the fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hervé Etienne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Menéndez-Yuffá, A., Barry-Etienne, D., Bertrand, B. et al. A comparative analysis of the development and quality of nursery plants derived from somatic embryogenesis and from seedlings for large-scale propagation of coffee (Coffea arabica L.). Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 102, 297–307 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-010-9734-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-010-9734-4

Keywords

Navigation