Skip to main content
Log in

The role of sucrose and different cytokinins in the in vitro floral morphogenesis of rose (hybrid tea) cv. “First Prize”

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shoots of rose (hybrid tea) cv. “First Prize” were induced to flower in vitro on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium containing various sucrose concentrations (15, 30 or 45 g l−1) and different phytohormone combinations of different cytokinins [N6-benzyladenine (BA); thidiazuron (TDZ) and zeatin] with α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA). Results indicate that sucrose is the key factor in floral morphogenesis while cytokinin increases the flowering percentage and helps the normal development of floral buds. From the three cytokinins that were used, BA and zeatin were considered to be more suitable as inductive flowering agents than TDZ. Reduced inorganic and organic salt concentration in MS media had a positive effect on in vitro flowering. The morphology of shoots bearing floral buds varied with different cytokinin treatments. The highest percentage (45%) of flowering was obtained on MS medium supplemented with 3.0 mg l−1 BA, 0.1 mg l−1 NAA and 30 g l−1 sucrose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BA:

N6-benzyladenine

TDZ:

Thidiazuron

NAA:

α-Naphthaleneacetic acid

MS:

Murashige and Skoog

PGR:

Plant growth regulator

References

  • Al-Wareh H, Trolinder NL, Goodin JR (1989) In vitro flowering of potato. HortScience 24: 827–829

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernier G, Havelange A, Houssa C, Petitjean A, Lejeune P (1993) Physiological signals that induce flowering. Plant Cell 5: 1147–1155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dielen V, Lecouvet V, Dupont S, Kinet JM (2001) In vitro control of floral transition in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.), the model for autonomously flowering plants, using the late flowering uniflora mutant. J. Exp. Bot. 52: 715–723

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan DB (1955) Multiple range and multiple F test. Biometrics 11: 1–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin G, Pius PK, Ignacimuthu S (2000) Factors affecting in vitro flowering and fruiting of green pea (Pisum sativum L.). Euphytica 115: 65–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim R, Debergh PC (2001) Factors controlling high efficiency adventitious bud formation and plant regeneration from in vitro leaf explants of roses (Rosa hydrida L.). Sci. Hort. 88: 41–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ignacimuthu S, Franklin G, Melchias G (1997) Multiple shoot formation and in vitro fruiting of Vigna mungo L. Hepper. Curr. Sci. 73: 733–735

    Google Scholar 

  • Jumin HB, Nito N (1995) Embryogenic protoplast cultures of orange Jessamine (Murraya paniculata) and their regeneration on plant flowering in vitro. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 41: 277–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jumin HB, Nito N (1996) In vitro flowering of Fortunella hindsii (Champ.). Plant Cell Rep. 15: 484–488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KC, Oh JY, Jee SO, Chung JD (2003a) In vitro micropropagation of Rosa hybrida L. J. Plant Biotech. 5: 115–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim KC, Chung JD, Jee SO, Oh JY (2003b) Somatic embryogenesis from in vitro grown leaf explants of Rosa hydrida L. J. Plant Biotech. 5: 161–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kintzios S, Michaelakis A (1999) Induction of somatic embryogenesis and in vitro flowering from inflorescences of chamomile (Chamomilla recutita L.). Plant Cell Rep. 18: 684–690

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kostenyuk I, Oh BJ, So IS (1999) Induction of early flowering in Cymbidium niveomarginatum Mak in vitro. Plant Cell Rep. 19: 1–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee HS, Yang SG, Liu JR, Lee KW (1989) The control of in vitro flowering of ginseng (Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer) by growth regulators. Kor. J. Bot. 32: 255–264

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CC, Lin CS, Chang WC (2003) In vitro flowering of Bambusa edulis and subsequent plantlet survival. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 72: 71–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CS, Lin CC, Chang WC (2004) Effect of thidiazuron on vegetative tissue-derived somatic embryogenesis and flowering of bamboo Bambusa edulis. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 76: 75–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) Revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rastogi R, Sawhney VK (1986) In vivo culture of young floral buds of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Plant Sci. 47: 221–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts AV, Blake PS, Lewis R, Taylor JM, Dunstan DI (1999) The effect of gibberellins on flowering in roses. J. Plant Growth Regul. 18: 113–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scorza R (1982) In vitro flowering: a review. HortScience 4: 106–127

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scorza R, Janick J (1980) In vitro flowering of Passiflora suberosa L. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 105: 892–897

    Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira da Silva JAT, Nhut DT (2003) Thin cell layers and floral morphogenesis, floral genetics and in vitro flowering. In: Nhut DT, Le BV, Van TT, Thorpe T (eds). Thin Cell Layer Culture System: Regeneration and Transformation Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 285–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran Thanh Van M (1973) In vitro control of de novo flower, but, root, and callus differentiation from excised epidermal tissues. Nature (Lond.) 246: 44–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Staden J, Dickens CWS (1991) In vitro induction of flowering and its relevance to micropropagation. In: Bajaj YPS (ed). Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, vol 17: High-tech and Micropropagation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg New York, pp. 85–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang GY, Yuan MF, Hong Y (2002) In vitro induction in roses. In vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 38: 513–518

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Tang L, Chen F (2001) In vitro flowering of bitter melon. Plant Cell Rep. 20: 393–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Werner T, Motyka V, Strnad M, Schmulling T (2001) Regulation of plant growth by cytokinin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98: 10487–10492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wittwer SH, Aung LH (1969) Lycopersicon esculentun Mill. In: Evans LT (ed). The Induction of Flowering: Some Case Histories. Macmillan, London, pp. 409–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Leung DWM (2000) A comparison of in vitro with in vivo flowering in Gentian. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 63: 223–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duong Tan Nhut.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vu, N.H., Anh, P.H. & Nhut, D.T. The role of sucrose and different cytokinins in the in vitro floral morphogenesis of rose (hybrid tea) cv. “First Prize”. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 87, 315–320 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-006-9089-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-006-9089-z

Keywords

Navigation