Skip to main content
Log in

Micropropagation of tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa)

  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated the in vitro propagation by axillary budding of different cultivars of tree peonies, selected for cut flower production under Mediterranean conditions. Buds with expanded leaves were better to initiate cultures than just emerged ones (64%compared to 43%). The aptitude for micropropagation was genotype-dependent, and the propagation ratio ranged between 2 and 5 per cycle. Tendency to necrosis and/or hyperhydricity were also genotype dependent. Indole-3-butyric acid improved rooting but was not really necessary provided the shoots were pre-treated at 2 °C for 7days. Plantlets were successfully acclimatized under in vitro conditions. Adventitious propagation was achieved using filaments and petals as explants. They first developed callus, able to regenerate shoots after 8 weeks on media supplemented with thidiazuron.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albers MRJ & Kunneman BPAM (1992) Micropropagation of Paeonia. Acta Horticult. 314: 85–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhojwani SS & Razdan MK (1996) Plant Tissue Culture: Theory and Practice, a revised edition. Elsevier Science

  • Bouza L, Jacques M & Miginiac E (1994a) In vitro propagation of Paeonia suffruticosa Andr.cv. ‘Mme de Vatry’: developmental effects of exogenous hormones during the multiplication phase. Sci. Horticult. 57: 241–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouza L, Jacques M & Miginiac E (1994b) Requirements for in vitro rooting of Paeonia suffruticosa Andr.cv. ‘Mme de Vatry’. Sci. Horticult. 58: 223–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchheim JAT & Meyer MM (1992) Micropropagation of peony (Paeonia spp.). In: Bajaj YPS (ed) Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Vol. 20 (pp. 269–285). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Černá K, Dedičová B & Borbélyová D (2001) Micropropagation of Paeonia arborea Donn, Syn.P. suffruticosa Andr. Acta Fytotechnica et Zootech. 4: 51–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton ME & Koch JM (2001) Influence of plant preservative mixture (PPM)™ on adventitious organogenesis in melon, petunia, and tobacco. In vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 37: 259–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst R (1994) Effects of thidiazuron on in vitro propagation of Phalaenopsis and Doritaenopsis (Orchideaceae). Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 39: 273–275

    Google Scholar 

  • George EF & Sherrington PD (1984) Plant Propagation by Tissue Culture. Exegetic Limited, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris RA & Mantell SH (1991) Effects of Stage II durations on the multiplication rate and rooting capacity of micropropagated shoots of tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa Andr.). J. Horticult. Sci. 66: 95–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Huetteman CA & Preece JE (1993) Thidiazuron: a potent cytokinin for woody plant tissue culture. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 33: 105–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Wu D, Pan S, Xu S, Wei Z, Xu Z & Li X (1984) In vitro propagation of Paeonia suffruticosa. Kexue Tongbao 29: 1675–1678

    Google Scholar 

  • Lianying W (1998) Chinese Tree Peony. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing, China

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin CS & Chang WC (1998) Micropropagation of Bambusa edulis through nodal explants of field-grown culms and flowering of regenerated plantlets. Plant Cell Rep. 17: 617–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin JJ, Thomas JA & Meyer MM (1987) Tissue culture and embryoid formation in Paeonia lactiflora Pall. Am. Peony Soc. Bull. 263: 24–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd G & McCown B (1980) Commercially-feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel, Kalima latifolia, by use of shoot tip culture. Pro. Intl. Plant Prop. Soc. 30: 421–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithila J, Hall JC, Victor JMR & Saxena PK (2003) Thidiazuron induces shoot organogenesis at low concentrations and somatic embryogenesis at high concentrations on leaf and petiole explants of African violet (Saintpaulia ionantha Wendl.). Plant Cell Rep. 21: 408–414

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer MM (1976) Culture of Paeonia callus by tissue culture techniques. Am. Peony Soc. Bull. 218: 27–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Niedz RP & Bausher MG (2002) Control of in vitro contamination of explants from greenhouse and field-grown trees. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 38: 468–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Radtke GM (1983) Tissue culture of herbaceous peonies. Am. Peony Soc. Bull. 246: 19–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts M & Sunderland N (1977) Pollen culture of Paeonia. John Innes Inst Ann. Rep. 68: 60–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers A (1996) Peonies. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H & van Staden J (2001) Establishment of in vitro cultures of tree peonies. South African J. Bot. 67: 358–361

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beruto, M., Lanteri, L. & Portogallo, C. Micropropagation of tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 79, 249–255 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-004-0666-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-004-0666-8

Navigation