Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Trends in management and outcomes of pulmonary embolism with a multidisciplinary response team

  • Published:
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism (PE) response teams have garnered widespread adoption given the complexities of managing acute PE and provide a platform for assessment of trends in therapy and outcomes. We describe temporal trends in PE management and outcomes following the deployment of such a team. All consecutive patients managed by our multidisciplinary PE response team activated by the Emergency Department were included over a 5-year calendar period. We examined temporal trends in management and rates of a composite primary endpoint (all-cause-death, major bleeding, recurrent venous thromboembolism, and readmission) at 30 days and 6 months. We assessed 425 patients between 2015 and 2019. We observed an increase in PE acuity and use of systemic thrombolysis. The primary endpoint at 30 days decreased from 16.3% in 2015 to 7.1% in 2019 (adjusted rate ratio per period, 0.63; 95%CI, 0.47–0.84), driven by a decrease in the adjusted rate of major bleeding. Among 406 patients with complete follow-up, the adjusted rate ratio per year for the primary outcome at 6 months was 0.37 (95%CI, 0.19–0.71), driven by a decrease in all-cause mortality. We observed evidence of temporal changes in clinical presentation, therapeutic strategies, and outcomes for acute PE, in parallel to, but not necessarily because of, the implementation of a multidisciplinary response team. Over time, major bleeding, mortality and readmission rates decreased, despite an increase in PE risk category.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Becattini C, Agnelli G, Lankeit M et al (2016) Acute pulmonary embolism: mortality prediction by the 2014 European Society of Cardiology risk stratification model. Eur Respir J 48(3):780–786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lankhaar JW, Westerhof N, Faes TJ et al (2006) Quantification of right ventricular afterload in patients with and without pulmonary hypertension. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 291(4):H1731-1737

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Begieneman MP, van de Goot FR, van der Bilt IA et al (2008) Pulmonary embolism causes endomyocarditis in the human heart. Heart 94(4):450–456

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Becattini C, Agnelli G (2020) Acute treatment of venous thromboembolism. Blood 135(5):305–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Piazza G, Hohlfelder B, Jaff MR et al (2015) A prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial of ultrasound-facilitated, catheter-directed, low-dose fibrinolysis for acute massive and submassive pulmonary emboLism: The SEATTLE II study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8(10):1382–1392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tu T, Toma C, Tapson VF et al (2019) A prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial of catheter-directed mechanical thrombectomy for intermediate-risk acute pulmonary embolism: the FLARE study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 12(9):859–869

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sista AK, Horowitz JM, Tapson VF et al (2021) Indigo aspiration system for treatment of pulmonary embolism: results of the EXTRACT-PE trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 14(3):319–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Guglin M, Zucker MJ, Bazan VM et al (2019) Venoarterial ECMO for adults: JACC scientific expert panel. J Am Coll Cardiol 73(6):698–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Meneveau N, Guillon B, Planquette B et al (2018) Outcomes after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for the treatment of high-risk pulmonary embolism: a multicentre series of 52 cases. Eur Heart J 39(47):4196–4204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Provias T, Dudzinski DM, Jaff MR et al (2014) The massachusetts general hospital pulmonary embolism response team (MGH PERT): creation of a multidisciplinary program to improve care of patients with massive and submassive pulmonary embolism. Hosp Pract 42(1):31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rivera-Lebron B, McDaniel M, Ahrar K et al (2019) Diagnosis, treatment and follow up of acute pulmonary embolism: consensus practice from the PERT consortium. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 25:1076029619853037

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C et al (2020) 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J 41(4):543–603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Myc LA, Solanki JN, Barros AJ et al (2020) Adoption of a dedicated multidisciplinary team is associated with improved survival in acute pulmonary embolism. Respir Res 21(1):159

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Carroll BJ, Pemberton H, Bauer KA et al (2017) Initiation of a multidisciplinary, rapid response team to massive and submassive pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 120(8):1393–1398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Xenos ES, Davis GA, He Q, Green A, Smyth SS (2019) The implementation of a pulmonary embolism response team in the management of intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 7(4):493–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schultz J, Giordano N, Zheng H et al (2019) EXPRESS: a multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) - Experience from a national multicenter consortium. Pulm Circ 9(3): 2045894018824563

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Chaudhury P, Gadre SK, Schneider E et al (2019) Impact of multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response team availability on management and outcomes. Am J Cardiol 124(9):1465–1469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jen WY, Kristanto W, Teo L et al (2020) Assessing the impact of a pulmonary embolism response team and treatment protocol on patients presenting with acute pulmonary embolism. Heart Lung Circ 29(3):345–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosovsky R, Chang Y, Rosenfield K et al (2019) Changes in treatment and outcomes after creation of a pulmonary embolism response team (PERT), a 10-year analysis. J Thromb Thrombolysis 47(1):31–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Giri JS, Piazza G (2018) A midterm report card for pulmonary embolism response teams. Vasc Med 23(1):72–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jimenez D, Rodriguez C, Leon F et al (2022) Randomised controlled trial of a prognostic assessment and management pathway to reduce the length of hospital stay in normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Respir J 59(2):2100412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Carroll BJ, Beyer SE, Mehegan T et al (2020) Changes in care for acute pulmonary embolism through a multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response team. Am J Med 133(11):1313-1321.e1316

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Wattinne L, Giraud F (1992) Central pulmonary thromboembolism: diagnosis with spiral volumetric CT with the single-breath-hold technique–comparison with pulmonary angiography. Radiology 185(2):381–387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Investigators P (1990) Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA 263(20):2753–2759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dudzinski DM, Piazza G (2016) Multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response teams. Circulation 133(1):98–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tritschler T, Kraaijpoel N, Girard P et al (2020) Definition of pulmonary embolism-related death and classification of the cause of death in venous thromboembolism studies: communication from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 18(6):1495–1500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schulman S, Kearon C (2005) Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation of the S, Standardization Committee of the International Society on T, Haemostasis. Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J Thromb Haemost 3(4):692–694

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sanchez O, Trinquart L, Colombet I et al (2008) Prognostic value of right ventricular dysfunction in patients with haemodynamically stable pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Eur Heart J 29(12):1569–1577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Epidemiology 18(6):800–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Althouse AD, Below JE, Claggett BL et al (2021) recommendations for statistical reporting in cardiovascular medicine: a special report From the American Heart Association. Circulation 144(4):e70–e91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Baldi B, Moore DS (2017) Practice of statistics in the life sciences, Fourth edition. W. H. Freeman, p 768

  32. King G, Zeng L (2001) Logistic regression in rare events data. Polit Anal 9(2):137–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. King JE (2003) Running a best-subsets logistic regression: an alternative to stepwise methods. Educ Psychol Measur 63(3):392–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Barnard J, Meng XL (1999) Applications of multiple imputation in medical studies: from AIDS to NHANES. Stat Methods Med Res 8(1):17–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Austin PC, Lee DS, Fine JP (2016) Introduction to the analysis of survival data in the presence of competing risks. Circulation 133(6):601–609

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kabrhel C, Rosovsky R, Channick R et al (2016) A multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response team: initial 30-month experience with a novel approach to delivery of care to patients with submassive and massive pulmonary embolism. Chest 150(2):384–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Erkens PM, Prins MH (2010) Fixed dose subcutaneous low molecular weight heparins versus adjusted dose unfractionated heparin for venous thromboembolism. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001100.pub3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Smythe MA, Priziola J, Dobesh PP, Wirth D, Cuker A, Wittkowsky AK (2016) Guidance for the practical management of the heparin anticoagulants in the treatment of venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Thrombolysis 41(1):165–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Sharifi M, Bay C, Skrocki L, Rahimi F, Mehdipour M, Investigators M (2013) Moderate pulmonary embolism treated with thrombolysis (from the “MOPETT” Trial). Am J Cardiol 111(2):273–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang C, Zhai Z, Yang Y et al (2010) Efficacy and safety of low dose recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator for the treatment of acute pulmonary thromboembolism: a randomized, multicenter, controlled trial. Chest 137(2):254–262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kiser TH, Burnham EL, Clark B et al (2018) Half-dose versus full-dose alteplase for treatment of pulmonary embolism. Crit Care Med 46(10):1617–1625

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. van Es N, Coppens M, Schulman S, Middeldorp S, Buller HR (2014) Direct oral anticoagulants compared with vitamin K antagonists for acute venous thromboembolism: evidence from phase 3 trials. Blood 124(12):1968–1975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Stevens SM, Woller SC, Kreuziger LB et al (2021) Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: second update of the CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest 160(6):e545–e608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ording AG, Skjoth F, Sogaard M et al (2021) Increasing incidence and declining mortality after cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: a nationwide cohort study. Am J Med 134(7):868-876.e865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design: RC, UC, GP; data collection: RC, UC, KSJ, ZIA, ABW, SZG, GP; data curation: RC, UC, JES, SR, GP; writing—first draft: RC, GP; writing—critical revision: RC, UC, LM, KSJ, ZIA, JES, SR, ABW, SZG, GP.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory Piazza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

RC, ABW, SR have no relevant competing interests to declare. KJ is supported by the National Institutes of Health (Training Grant 5-T32 HL007604). GP receives research grant support from BMS/Pfizer Alliance, Amgen, BSC, Janssen, Bayer, and Alexion. SZG receives research grant support from Bayer Healthcare, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Boston Scientific BTG EKOS, Daiichi, Jansen, NHLBI, and Pfizer, and consultant grant from Agile, Bayer Health-care, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Pfizer.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1436 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chopard, R., Campia, U., Morin, L. et al. Trends in management and outcomes of pulmonary embolism with a multidisciplinary response team. J Thromb Thrombolysis 54, 449–460 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-022-02697-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-022-02697-3

Keywords

Navigation