Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A survey of internists’ recommendations for aspirin in older adults and barriers to evidence-based use

  • Published:
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent trials suggest that aspirin for primary prevention may do more harm than good for some, including adults over 70 years of age. We sought to assess how primary care providers (PCPs) use aspirin for the primary prevention in older patients and to identify barriers to use according to recent guidelines, which recommend against routine use in patients over age 70. We surveyed PCPs about whether they would recommend aspirin in clinical vignettes of a 75-year-old patient with a 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk of 25%. We also queried perceived difficulty following guideline recommendations, as well as perceived barriers and facilitators. We obtained responses from 372 PCPs (47.9% response). In the patient vignette, 45.4% of clinicians recommended aspirin use, which did not vary by whether the patient was using aspirin initially (p = 0.21); 41.7% believed aspirin was beneficial. Perceived barriers to guideline-based aspirin use included concern about patients being upset (41.6%), possible malpractice claims (25.0%), and not having a strategy for discussing aspirin use (24.5%). The estimated adjusted probability of rating the guideline as “hard to follow” was higher in clinicians who believed aspirin was beneficial (29.4% vs. 8.0%; p < 0.001) and who worried the patient would be upset if told to stop aspirin (26.7% vs. 12.5%; p = 0.001). Internists vary considerably in their recommendations for aspirin use for primary prevention in older patients. A high proportion of PCPs continue to believe aspirin is beneficial in this setting. These results can inform de-implementation efforts to optimize evidence-based aspirin use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O’Brien CW, Juraschek SP, Wee CC (2020) Prevalence of aspirin use for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in the united states: results from the 2017 national health interview survey. Ann Intern Med 171:596–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stuntz M, Bernstein B (2017) Recent trends in the prevalence of low-dose aspirin use for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in the United States, 2012–2015. Prev Med Rep 5:183–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams CD, Chan AT, Elman MR, Kristensen AH, Miser WF, Pignone MP, Stafford RS, McGregor JC (2015) Aspirin use among adults in the U.S.: results of a national survey. Am J Prev Med 48:501–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Baigent C, Blackwell L, Collins R, Emberson J, Godwin J, Peto R, Buring J, Hennekens C, Kearney P, Meade T, Patrono C, Roncaglioni MC, Zanchetti A, Collaboration AT (2009) Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials. Lancet 373:1849–1860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Raber I, McCarthy CP, Vaduganathan M, Bhatt DL, Wood DA, Cleland JGF, Blumenthal RS, McEvoy JW (2019) The rise and fall of aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Lancet 393:2155–2167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ridker PM (2018) Should aspirin be used for primary prevention in the post-statin era? N Engl J Med 379:1572–1574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, Buroker AB, Goldberger ZD, Hahn EJ, Himmelfarb CD, Khera A, Lloyd-Jones D, McEvoy JW, Michos ED, Miedema MD, Muñoz D, Smith SC, Virani SS, Williams KA, Yeboah J, Ziaeian B (2019) 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation 140:e596–e646

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. US Preventive Services Task Force (2022). Aspirin Use to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 327(16):1577–1584. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.4983

  9. Halli-Tierney AD, Scarbrough C, Carroll D (2019) Polypharmacy: evaluating risks and deprescribing. Am Fam Physician 100:32–38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pretorius RW, Gataric G, Swedlund SK, Miller JR (2013) Reducing the risk of adverse drug events in older adults. Am Fam Physician 87:331–336

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Crossing the Quality Chasm (2001) A new health system for the 21st century. National Academies Press, Washington (DC)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Suri G, Sheppes G, Schwartz C, Gross JJ (2013) Patient inertia and the status quo bias: when an inferior option is preferred. Psychol Sci 24:1763–1769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ganguli I, Chang Y, Weissman A, Armstrong K, Metlay JP (2016) Ebola risk and preparedness: a national survey of internists. J Gen Intern Med 31:276–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Perez SL, Weissman A, Read S, Smith CD, Colello L, Peter D, Nickel WUS (2019) Internists’ perspectives on discussing cost of care with patients: structured interviews and a survey. Ann Intern Med 170:S39–S45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Caverly TJ, Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Kirsh S, Kullgren JT, Prenovost K, Kerr EA (2015) Appropriate prescribing for patients with diabetes at high risk for hypoglycemia: national survey of veterans affairs health care professionals. JAMA Intern Med 175:1994–1996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bowman L, Mafham M, Wallendszus K, Stevens W, Buck G, Barton J, Murphy K, Aung T, Haynes R, Cox J, Murawska A, Young A, Lay M, Chen F, Sammons E, Waters E, Adler A, Bodansky J, Farmer A, McPherson R, Neil A, Simpson D, Peto R, Baigent C, Collins R, Parish S, Armitage J, Group ASC (2018) Effects of aspirin for primary prevention in persons with diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 379:1529–1539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McNeil JJ, Nelson MR, Woods RL, Lockery JE, Wolfe R, Reid CM, Kirpach B, Shah RC, Ives DG, Storey E, Ryan J, Tonkin AM, Newman AB, Williamson JD, Margolis KL, Ernst ME, Abhayaratna WP, Stocks N, Fitzgerald SM, Orchard SG, Trevaks RE, Beilin LJ, Donnan GA, Gibbs P, Johnston CI, Radziszewska B, Grimm R, Murray AM, Group AI (2018) Effect of aspirin on all-cause mortality in the healthy elderly. N Engl J Med 379:1519–1528

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. McNeil JJ, Wolfe R, Woods RL, Tonkin AM, Donnan GA, Nelson MR, Reid CM, Lockery JE, Kirpach B, Storey E, Shah RC, Williamson JD, Margolis KL, Ernst ME, Abhayaratna WP, Stocks N, Fitzgerald SM, Orchard SG, Trevaks RE, Beilin LJ, Johnston CI, Ryan J, Radziszewska B, Jelinek M, Malik M, Eaton CB, Brauer D, Cloud G, Wood EM, Mahady SE, Satterfield S, Grimm R, Murray AM, Group AI (2018) Effect of aspirin on cardiovascular events and bleeding in the healthy elderly. N Engl J Med 379:1509–1518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. McNeil JJ, Woods RL, Nelson MR, Reid CM, Kirpach B, Wolfe R, Storey E, Shah RC, Lockery JE, Tonkin AM, Newman AB, Williamson JD, Margolis KL, Ernst ME, Abhayaratna WP, Stocks N, Fitzgerald SM, Orchard SG, Trevaks RE, Beilin LJ, Donnan GA, Gibbs P, Johnston CI, Ryan J, Radziszewska B, Grimm R, Murray AM, Group AI (2018) Effect of aspirin on disability-free survival in the healthy elderly. N Engl J Med 379:1499–1508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Gaziano JM, Brotons C, Coppolecchia R, Cricelli C, Darius H, Gorelick PB, Howard G, Pearson TA, Rothwell PM, Ruilope LM, Tendera M, Tognoni G, Committee AE (2018) Use of aspirin to reduce risk of initial vascular events in patients at moderate risk of cardiovascular disease (ARRIVE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 392:1036–1046

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Halabi Z, Osman M, Hoteit R (2020) Primary care physicians’ awareness and perceptions on adherence to primary cardiovascular disease prevention guidelines in lebanon: a cross-sectional study. Chronic Illn. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742395320983879

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Krishnaswami A, Steinman MA, Goyal P, Zullo AR, Anderson TS, Birtcher KK, Goodlin SJ, Maurer MS, Alexander KP, Rich MW, Tjia J (2019) Geriatric cardiology section leadership council ACoC. Deprescribing in older adults with cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 73:2584–2595

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Reeve E, Wolff JL, Skehan M, Bayliss EA, Hilmer SN, Boyd CM (2018) Assessment of attitudes toward deprescribing in older medicare beneficiaries in the United States. JAMA Intern Med 178:1673–1680

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. VanWormer JJ, Miller AW, Rezkalla SH (2014) Aspirin overutilization for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Clin Epidemiol 6:433–440

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Steinman MA, Landefeld CS (2018) Overcoming inertia to improve medication use and deprescribing. JAMA 320:1867–1869

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Banerjee A, Khandelwal S, Nambiar L, Saxena M, Peck V, Moniruzzaman M, Faria Neto JR, Quinto KC, Smyth A, Leong D, Werba JP (2016) Health system barriers and facilitators to medication adherence for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. Open Heart 3:e000438

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Oldenburg NC, Duval S, Luepker RV, Finnegan JR, LaMarre H, Peterson KA, Zantek ND, Jacobs G, Straka RJ, Miller KH, Hirsch AT (2014) A 16-month community-based intervention to increase aspirin use for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Prev Chronic Dis 11:E83

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Norton WE, Chambers DA (2020) Unpacking the complexities of de-implementing inappropriate health interventions. Implement Sci 15:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pignone M, Anderson GK, Binns K, Tilson HH, Weisman SM (2007) Aspirin use among adults aged 40 and older in the United States: results of a national survey. Am J Prev Med 32:403–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kolber M, Sharif N, Marceau R, Szafran O (2013) Family practice patients’ use of acetylsalicylic acid for cardiovascular disease prevention. Can Fam Physician 59:55–61

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Persell SD, Zei C, Cameron KA, Zielinski M, Lloyd-Jones DM (2010) Potential use of 10-year and lifetime coronary risk information for preventive cardiology prescribing decisions: a primary care physician survey. Arch Intern Med 170:470–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, Albus C, Brotons C, Catapano AL, Cooney MT, Corrà U, Cosyns B, Deaton C, Graham I, Hall MS, Hobbs FDR, Løchen ML, Löllgen H, Marques-Vidal P, Perk J, Prescott E, Redon J, Richter DJ, Sattar N, Smulders Y, Tiberi M, van der Worp HB, van Dis I, Verschuren WMM, Binno S, Group ESCSD (2016) European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: the sixth joint task force of the european society of cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts)developed with the special contribution of the european association for cardiovascular prevention & rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur Heart J 37:2315–2381

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Bibbins-Domingo K, Force USPST (2016) Aspirin use for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and colorectal cancer: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 164:836–845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases through a K23 award (K23DK118179) (JEK).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GDB and JEK acquired the data; GDB, JEK, JBS, and SDS conceived the study, while GEB, JKS, TJC, and JEK designed the study. JEK had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data; JKS and JEK takes responsibility for the accuracy of the data analysis. JKS drafted the article. All the authors were involved in the writing and editing of the manuscript and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordan K. Schaefer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr Barnes reports personal fees from Pfizer/Bristol Myer Squibb, Janssen, Acelis Connected Health, and serves on the board of directors for the Anticoagulation Forum. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose related to this project.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PPTX 47 kb)

Supplementary file2 (PDF 174 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schaefer, J.K., Barnes, G.D., Sussman, J.B. et al. A survey of internists’ recommendations for aspirin in older adults and barriers to evidence-based use. J Thromb Thrombolysis 54, 639–646 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-022-02669-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-022-02669-7

Keywords

Navigation