Abstract
Pulmonary thromboembolism and deep venous thrombosis occur frequently in hospitalised patients with COVID-19, the prevalence increases on the intensive care unit (ICU) and is very high in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We undertook a literature review to assess the usefulness of screening for peripheral venous thrombosis or pulmonary thrombosis in patients admitted with COVID-19. Outside of the ICU setting, D-dimer elevation on presentation or marked increase from baseline should alert the need for doppler ultrasound scan of the lower limbs. In the ICU setting, consideration should be given to routine screening with doppler ultrasound, given the high prevalence of thrombosis in this cohort despite standard anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis. However, absence of lower limb thrombosis on ultrasound does not exclude pulmonary venous thrombosis. Screening with CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is not justified in patients on the general wards, unless there are clinical features and/or marked elevations in markers of COVID-19-associated coagulopathy. However, the risk of pulmonary embolism or pulmonary thrombosis in ICU patients is very high, especially in patients on ECMO, where studies that employed routine screening for thrombosis with CT scanning have uncovered up to 100% incidence of pulmonary thrombosis despite standard anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis. Therefore, in patients at low bleeding risk and high clinical suspicion of venous thromboembolism, therapeutic anticoagulation should be considered even before screening, Our review highlights the need for increased vigilance for VTE, with a low threshold for doppler ultrasound and CTPA in high risk in-patient cohorts, where clinical features and D-dimer levels may not accurately reflect the occurrence of pulmonary thromboembolism.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Highlights
-
The frequency of pulmonary and venous thromboembolism is high in hospitalised patients with COVID-19, with even higher prevalence amongst those on the intensive care unit (ICU) and especially those on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).
-
In the ICU setting, consideration should be given to routine screening with doppler ultrasound, given the high prevalence of thrombosis despite standard anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis. In patients on ECMO, studies employing routine screening with CT scanning have uncovered up to 100% incidence of pulmonary thrombosis despite anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis. Absence of lower limb thrombosis on ultrasound does not exclude pulmonary venous thrombosis.
-
Our review highlights the need for increased vigilance for venous thromboembolism, with a low threshold for doppler ultrasound and CT in high-risk in-patient cohorts, where clinical features and D-dimer levels may not accurately reflect the occurrence of pulmonary thromboembolism.
Introduction
COVID-19, a viral respiratory illness caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, may predispose patients to thrombotic disease, both in the venous and arterial circulations, due to excessive inflammation, platelet activation, endothelial dysfunction, and stasis [1].
Screening for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hospitalized COVID-19 patients is challenging. On the one hand, one should avoid a surge in upper and/or lower vascular ultrasound studies to avoid unnecessary prolonged direct exposure of staff to infected patients, avoid the risk of transmission of COVID-19 between patients via sonographers and avoid unnecessary wastage of personal protective equipment (PPE) [2]. On the other hand, the incidence of VTE in critically-ill COVID-19 patients is high and standard clinical symptoms associated with lower or upper extremity thrombus, such as swelling and pain, are often difficult to assess in intubated patients [3]. Therefore, timing, patient selection and VTE-scanning methods should be critically reassessed based on local availability of staff and PPE.
Doppler ultrasound scan (DUS)
On the general ward (non-ICU)
Several studies report a lower incidence of VTE in COVID-19 patients hospitalized on a medical ward (ranging between 1.6 and 22.5%) as compared to intensive care unit (ICU)-patients (25%–100%) [4, 5]. Lerardi et al. report a deep venous thrombosis (DVT) incidence of 1.6% among 60 non-ICU patients, routinely screened by doppler ultrasound [6]. In a prospective study of 156 non-ICU COVID-19 patients with D-dimer levels > 1000 ng/ml, compression ultrasound screening for asymptomatic DVT showed an incidence of 14.7% (only one proximal DVT) [7]; findings in line with another systematic screening for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) by lower limb vein compression ultrasonography in 84 consecutive non-ICU patients despite uniform pharmacological thromboprophylaxis (incidence of 11.9%; 2.4% proximal DVT). Again, high D-dimer levels (> 3000 µg/L) were indicative of the presence of asymptomatic VTE [8]. In a retrospective cohort study of 71 non-ICU treated COVID-19 patients on anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis, who underwent systematic low limb venous duplex ultrasonography at hospital discharge or earlier if DVT was clinically suspected, 16 patients developed VTE (22.5%) and 7 PE (10%) [9].
On the intensive care unit (ICU)
As previously mentioned, the incidence of DVT in critically-ill COVID-19 ICU patients is high, despite prophylactic anticoagulation strategies. A cross-sectional study in Wuhan, China in 48 ICU patients on low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) thromboprophylaxis detected lower extremity DVTs in 41 patients (85.4%), with 36 (75%) isolated distal DVTs and 5 (10.4%) proximal DVT [10]. In another retrospective study from Wuhan, all 88 ICU patients on LMWH thromboprophylaxis underwent compression ultrasonography. Here, the overall incidence of DVT was 46% (95% confidence interval [CI] 35–56%), comprising of proximal DVT in 9% (95% CI 3–15%) and distal DVT in 46% (95% CI 35–56%) [11]. Several other studies performed systematic DUS screening in COVID-19 ICU patients on prophylactical anticoagulation and report VTE incidences of 58.6% up to 100% [12, 13] or DVT incidences of 65% (at admission; and 79% 48 h after admission) [14], 36% [15], 37.3% [16] and 46.1% [3] respectively. Remarkably, Grandmaison et al. report a high VTE-incidence of 56% even in ICU patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation [12]. A recent systematic review of 28 studies including a total of 2,928 patients with COVID-19 found that thrombotic complications were reported in 34% of ICU-managed patients, with DVT in 16.1% and PE in 12.6% of patients, despite anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis [17]. Studies adopting systematic screening for VTE with Duplex ultrasound reported a significantly higher incidence of venous thrombosis on the ICU compared to those relying on clinical suspicion (56.3% vs. 11.0%, p < 0.001) [17].
Timing and patient selection for doppler ultrasound
There is no clear guidance on how screening for VTE in COVID-19 patients should be organized. Some centres perform routine DUS in every hospitalized patient [12], some centres only in critically-ill patients [6] and others only when VTE-symptoms are present. In a study of patients on 2 French ICUs, where DUS is performed as a standard of care, the overall VTE incidence was reported to be 69% [13]. As previously discussed, in their multi-centric retrospective study of 388 COVID-19 patients, Lodigiani et al. reported a VTE incidence of 27.6% in the ICU without systematic ultrasound screening [18]. This difference lends strong support to systematic screening by DUS for COVID-19 patients on ICU. In another cohort study, all hospitalized (non-ICU and ICU) COVID-19 patients were screened with DUS on a single day (320 patients) [12]. Patients confirmed to have VTE were switched to therapeutic anticoagulation and followed by clinical evaluation and repeated DUS of the index venous thrombosis. Under therapeutic anticoagulation, they did not observe any extension of thrombosis or new symptomatic events. Davis et al. state that an ultrasound in patients with clinical suspicion of lower or upper limb DVT should only be considered in patients with high bleeding score (VTE-BLEED score) [19], otherwise therapeutic anticoagulation should be started based on clinical findings [20] or based on the correlation with respiratory and/or laboratory parameters (fraction of inspired oxygen, P/F ratio, respiratory rate, heparin administration, D-dimer > 4000 ng/ml, IL-6, high ferritin or CRP), conditions mainly affecting patients on ICU [6]. Whilst some papers discourage routine screening for VTE by DUS on regular wards in asymptomatic or less sick patients [6], others select patients for screening based on the VTE-BLEED score [21], dependent on the D-dimer level (> 3 × upper limit of normal or > 4000 ng/mL) [2] or based on the (modified) Wells score. However, D-dimer is not so useful in the COVID-19 cohort due to frequent marked baseline levels observed in patients with COVID-19 sepsis [22]. Nevertheless, a negative Wells score or Wells score below 2 should be reassuring, negating the need for additional imaging [21].
Doppler ultrasound scanning methods
Prolonged exposure of vascular sonographers to patients with COVID-19 should be carefully considered and balanced against the risks to staff and available resources, including staffing and PPE [2, 21]. Local scanning protocols should be re-evaluated to minimize the scanning time and thus exposure per patient. In one study, direct communication between physicians resulted in cancellation or deferral of 72% of requested examinations in COVID-19-positive patients. Preserving DUS screening for patients with D-dimer > 4000 ng/mL resulted in a significant (50%) decrease in the scan time (P < 0.0001) in comparison with conventional protocol [2].
A routine four limbs and neck compression duplex ultrasound should be sufficient to diagnose the majority of DVTs with minimal exposure time; when high clinical suspicion arises, a more focused scan at the site of the swelling can be obtained [12]. If available, wireless ultrasound probes, covered in single use transparent films should be used to minimise the risk of viral contamination [23].
Computerised tomography (CT)
Patients with COVID-19 have been shown to have an increased risk of pulmonary thrombosis and CT is the optimal modality to assess this. CT studies have shown that pulmonary thromboembolism in COVID-19 involves mainly the segmental and sub-segmental arteries of segments affected by consolidation and may represent pulmonary artery thrombosis due to severe lung inflammation and hypercoagulability rather than thromboembolism. Pulmonary thrombosis or thromboembolism is best detected with CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA). Amongst patients with COVID-19, the yield of CTPA for pulmonary thromboembolism is around 38% [24, 25].
In the majority of patients with evidence of pulmonary thromboembolism, the most proximal PE was in a segmental artery in 70% of patients, and the most proximal PE was located in the main/lobar pulmonary artery in 17% of patients [26], with similar distributions reported by others [27].
A number of studies have assessed the usefulness of CT scanning to diagnose VTE in patients with COVID-19, both in hospitalised patients on the general wards and inpatients on the intensive care unit (ICU). Since the prevalence of PE relates to the severity of the COVID-19 infection, most studies report on the usefulness and yield of CTPA in patients on the ICU. However, data from a single-centre retrospective review of all CTPA studies in patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 showed that in 1477 patients, 214 CTPA scans were performed, of which 84% were requested outside of the critical care setting. The overall proportion of PE in patients with COVID-19 was 5.4%. Amongst patients with a Wells score of ≥ 4 (‘PE likely’), 25% had PE and 25% did not. D-dimer was higher in patients with PE than without PE (median 8000 ng/mL; interquartile range [IQR] 4665–8000 ng/mL vs. 2060 ng/mL, IQR 1210–4410 ng/mL, P < 0.001). In the ‘low probability’ group, D-dimer was higher (P < 0.001) in those with PE but had a limited role in excluding PE. Of all the patients with PE on CTPA, 66% were outside the ICU and nearly half of PE events were diagnosed on hospital admission [25]. This is surprising because it is known that the risk of VTE increases with the duration of hospitalisation. In a single-centre cross-sectional study, all 70 patients hospitalized for more than 5 days in with COVID-19 pneumonia and treated with standard anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis, underwent 2-point compressive ultrasound assessment of the leg vein system. Asymptomatic DVT was identified in 9 (13.6%) patients and CTPA detected PE in five patients [28].
On the intensive care unit
Whilst in all-comers hospitalised with COVID-19, the prevalence of PE on CTCA was 5.4% [25, 29, 30], the yield of CTCA for PE ranges from 34 to 100% amongst patients on the ICU. In a retrospective review of 92 patients with ARDS on the ICU, 26 of the patients underwent CTPA and PE was detected in 16 patients, showing that CTPA had 62% yield for PE in this cohort. When present, PE was unilateral in 81% and bilateral in 19% of patients. The most proximal thrombus was localized in main (25%), lobar (12%) or segmental (63%) pulmonary artery. Most of the thrombi (81%) were located in a parenchymatous condensation. Only 19% of patients with PE on CT had lower limb DVT on Doppler ultrasound [27]. A couple of studies have reported on cohorts with COVID-19 on the ICU in whom routine CT scanning was performed. In an observational study of 39 consecutive mechanically-ventilated patients, of whom 51% received ECMO, all patients were scanned in a dedicated COVID-19 CT suite and PE was detected in 38.5% of patients [30]. In another single-centre study of 72 consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU with acquired respiratory distress syndrome, CT angiography of the thorax, abdomen and pelvis were performed on admission according to routine institutional protocol, with further imaging as clinically indicated. Some 58% of patients were diagnosed on CT to have thrombotic complications, comprising 47% of patients with pulmonary arterial thrombosis, 21% with peripheral venous thrombosis, and 7% with systemic arterial thromboses/end-organ embolic complications. In those with pulmonary arterial thromboses, 93% were identified incidentally on first screening CT with only 7% suspected clinically. Biomarkers of coagulation including D-dimer, fibrinogen level, activated partial thromboplastin time or of inflammation (white cell count, C-reactive protein), did not discriminate between patients with or without thrombotic complications [31].
In patients receiving extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
A retrospective observational analysis of 13 patients with ARDS requiring veno-venous ECMO, who all underwent CT, reported that 100% of the patients experienced venous thromboembolism, despite treatment with and close attention to anticoagulation. Ten patients had isolated cannula-associated DVT, two patients had isolated PE, and one patient had both cannula-associated DVT and PE. One patient had thrombotic occlusion of the centrifugal pump, and one had oxygenator thrombosis requiring circuit replacement [29]. Another report assessing the CT thorax of all 51 patients receiving ECMO with COVID-19 pneumonitis in a single centre showed that majority of patients had areas of ischaemia within consolidated lungs, almost half of these without subtending pulmonary artery thrombosis. Some 35% had macroscopic thrombosis and 26% had ischaemia without associated thrombus [32].
Usefulness of CT
It has been suggested that D-dimer should be used as a guide to indicate the likelihood of PE when no clinical features of PE are present [33]. However, estimation of D- dimer levels for predicting thrombosis risk, whilst useful in patients presenting to hospital, is generally not helpful, given the significant baseline elevations in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. The Report of the National Institute for Public Health of the Netherlands [33] recommends that in patients with COVID-19 in whom there is a high clinical suspicion for PE, and in whom the D-dimer level is elevated, CTPA should be considered. The D-dimer threshold used should follow locally used algorithms, that is, at least 500 µg/L with an age-adjusted threshold or 1000 µg/L or greater when no age criteria are present. In patients with a D-dimer < 1000 µg/L on admission but a significant increase during hospital stay to levels higher than 2000–4000 µg/L, imaging for DVT or PE should be considered, in particular if they develop features indicative of thrombosis such as venous congestion and/or thrombosis on chest CT scans, clotting of extracorporeal circuits, or deterioration in clinical condition such as hypoxia or hypotension.
In summary, CT is very useful modality to identify pulmonary thrombosis and embolism. The incidence of pulmonary thromboembolism increases with the severity of COVID-19 sepsis and so the yield of CTPA increases in the higher risk patients and in those on ICU, there should be a low threshold for requesting CTPA.
Sublingual ultrasound
COVID-19 is associated not only with macrovascular, but also microvascular thrombosis. A couple of small, exploratory studies have assessed the presence of sublingual microcirculatory and skin perfusion alterations in COVID-19 pneumonia. In a small prospective observational study of 27 mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS secondary to COVID-19, sublingual microcirculation was assessed by hand-held video microscopy with subsequent software-assisted analysis of videos [34]. Capillary refill time was prolonged, total and perfused vascular density were high; and the proportion of perfused vessels, microvascular flow index and red blood cell velocity were reduced. The proportion of perfused vessels was inversely correlated with total vascular density. These findings were indicative of microvascular thrombosis. In another small observational cohort study of 13 patients on the ICU, without clinical features of cardiogenic shock, in vivo evaluation of the sublingual microcirculation was performed using a handheld video capillaroscopy system with imaging analysed using the specialised software [35]. There was evidence of microvascular thrombosis in 11 patients (85%). Four patients (31%) exhibited complete stagnated capillaries and in 5 (38%) patients imaging indicated acute thromboembolic occlusion.
Discussion
Pulmonary and venous thrombosis occur frequently in patients with COVID-19 and pulmonary thrombosis is frequently non-embolic. The prevalence increases in ICU patients and is very high in patients on ECMO. In patients outside of the ICU setting, D-dimer elevation on presentation or marked increase from baseline should alert the need for doppler ultrasound scan of the lower limbs. In the ICU setting, consideration should be given to routine screening with doppler ultrasound, given the high prevalence of thrombosis in this cohort in the setting of standard anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis, if the diagnosis would alter management. Pulmonary thromboembolism usually affects distal vasculature. Screening with CTCA is not justified in patients on the general wards, unless there are clinical features and/or marked elevations in markers of COVID-19-associated coagulopathy. However, the risk of PE in ICU patients is very high, and especially in patients on ECMO, where studies that employed routine screening have uncovered up to 100% incidence of pulmonary thrombosis despite standard anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis. This highlights the need for increased dose thromboprophylaxis in high-risk patients, if possible, and increased vigilance, with a low threshold for requesting CTPA and understanding that lack of lower limb thrombosis on ultrasound does not exclude pulmonary venous thrombosis. The logistics of CT scanning all ICU patients with COVID-19 in most centres without a dedicated co-located CT scanner makes this unfeasible, both in terms of infection risk and also the risk of transporting such critically ill patients across the hospital. Therefore, in patients with low bleeding risk and high clinical suspicion of VTE, the initiation of therapeutic anticoagulation without confirmation of VTE by imaging should be considered. However, since clinical features and D-dimer levels may not accurately reflect the occurrence of pulmonary thromboembolism, more data are needed to identify an optimal diagnostic pathway in patients with COVID-19 (Fig. 1).
Abbreviations
- COVID-19:
-
Coronavirus 19
- CT:
-
Computerised tomography
- CTPA:
-
Computerised tomography pulmonary angiogram
- DUS:
-
Doppler ultrasound scan
- DVT:
-
Deep venous thrombosis
- ICU:
-
Intensive care unit
- LMWH:
-
Low molecular weight heparin
- PE:
-
Pulmonary embolism
- PPE:
-
Personal protective equipment
- VTE:
-
Venous thromboembolism
References
Wu F, Zhao S, Yu B et al (2020) A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature 579:265–269. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3
Dua A, Thondapu V, Rosovsky R et al (2020) Deep vein thrombosis protocol optimization to minimize healthcare worker exposure in coronavirus disease-2019. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.08.005
Zhang L, Feng X, Zhang D et al (2020) Deep vein thrombosis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: prevalence, risk factors, and outcome. Circulation 142:114–128. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046702
Huang C, Wang Y, Li X et al (2020) Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 395:497–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5
Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y et al (2020) Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 382:1708–1720. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2002032
Ierardi AM, Coppola A, Fusco S et al (2020) Early detection of deep vein thrombosis in patients with coronavirus disease 2019: who to screen and who not to with Doppler ultrasound? J Ultrasound. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-020-00515-1
Demelo-Rodriguez P, Cervilla-Munoz E, Ordieres-Ortega L et al (2020) Incidence of asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and elevated D-dimer levels. Thromb Res 192:23–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2020.05.018
Minuz P, Mansueto G, Mazzaferri F et al (2020) High rate of pulmonary thromboembolism in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Clin Microbiol Infect 26:1572–1573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.06.011
Artifoni M, Danic G, Gautier G et al (2020) Systematic assessment of venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 patients receiving thromboprophylaxis: incidence and role of D-dimer as predictive factors. J Thromb Thrombolysis 50:211–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-020-02146-z
Ren B, Yan F, Deng Z et al (2020) Extremely high incidence of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis in 48 patients with severe COVID-19 in Wuhan. Circulation 142:181–183. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047407
Chen S, Zhang D, Zheng T et al (2020) DVT incidence and risk factors in critically ill patients with COVID-19. J Thromb Thrombolysis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-020-02181-w
Grandmaison G, Andrey A, Periard D et al (2020) Systematic screening for venous thromboembolic events in COVID-19 pneumonia. TH Open 4:e113–e115. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1713167
Llitjos JF, Leclerc M, Chochois C et al (2020) High incidence of venous thromboembolic events in anticoagulated severe COVID-19 patients. J Thromb Haemost 18:1743–1746. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.14869
Nahum J, Morichau-Beauchant T, Daviaud F et al (2020) Venous thrombosis among critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Netw Open 3:e2010478. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10478
Voicu S, Bonnin P, Stepanian A et al (2020) High prevalence of deep vein thrombosis in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 76:480–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.053
Kapoor S, Chand S, Dieiev V et al (2020) Thromboembolic events and role of point of care ultrasound in hospitalized Covid-19 patients needing intensive care unit admission. J Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066620964392
Jenner WJ, Kanji R, Mirsadraee S et al (2020) Thrombotic complications in 2928 patients with COVID-19 treated in intensive care: a systematic review. J Thromb Thrombolysis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-021-02394-7
Lodigiani C, Iapichino G, Carenzo L et al (2020) (2020) Venous and arterial thromboembolic complications in COVID-19 patients admitted to an academic hospital in Milan Italy. Thromb Res 191:9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2020.04.024
Klok FA, Barco S, Konstantinides SV (2017) External validation of the VTE-BLEED score for predicting major bleeding in stable anticoagulated patients with venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost 117:1164–1170. https://doi.org/10.1160/TH16-10-0810
Davis ME, Haglund NA, Tricarico NM et al (2014) Development of acquired von Willebrand syndrome during short-term micro axial pump support: implications for bleeding in a patient bridged to a long-term continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. ASAIO J 60:355–357. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000000069
Obi AT, Barnes GD, Wakefield TW et al (2020) (2020) Practical diagnosis and treatment of suspected venous thromboembolism during COVID-19 pandemic. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 8:526–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.04.009
Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M et al (2003) Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 349:1227–1235. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa023153
Zamboni P (2020) COVID-19 as a vascular disease: lesson learned from imaging and blood biomarkers. Diagnostics (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10070440
Ooi MWX, Rajai A, Patel R et al (2020) Pulmonary thromboembolic disease in COVID-19 patients on CT pulmonary angiography Prevalence, pattern of disease and relationship to D-dimer. Eur J Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109336
Whyte MB, Kelly PA, Gonzalez E et al (2020) Pulmonary embolism in hospitalised patients with COVID-19. Thromb Res 195:95–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2020.07.025
van Dam LF, Kroft LJM, van der Wal LI et al (2020) Clinical and computed tomography characteristics of COVID-19 associated acute pulmonary embolism: a different phenotype of thrombotic disease? Thromb Res 193:86–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2020.06.010
Contou D, Pajot O, Cally R et al (2020) Pulmonary embolism or thrombosis in ARDS COVID-19 patients: A French monocenter retrospective study. PLoS One 15:e0238413. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238413
Giorgi-Pierfranceschi M, Paoletti O, Pan A et al (2020) Prevalence of asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis in patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: a cross-sectional study. Intern Emerg Med 15:1425–1433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-020-02472-3
Parzy G, Daviet F, Puech B et al (2020) Venous thromboembolism events following venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 based on CT scans. Crit Care Med 48:e971–e975. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004504
Patel BV, Arachchillage DJ, Ridge CA et al (2020) Pulmonary angiopathy in severe COVID-19: physiologic, imaging, and hematologic observations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 202:690–699. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202004-1412OC
Mirsadraee S, Gorog DA, Mahon CF et al (2021) Prevalence of thrombotic complications in ICU-treated patients with coronavirus disease 2019 detected with systematic CT scanning. Crit Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004890
Mak SM, Mak D, Hodson D et al (2020) Pulmonary ischaemia without pulmonary arterial thrombus in COVID-19 patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a cohort study. Clin Radiol 75(795):e791–e795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2020.07.006
Oudkerk M, Buller HR, Kuijpers D et al (2020) Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of thromboembolic complications in COVID-19: report of the national institute for public health of the Netherlands. Radiology 297:E216–E222. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020201629
Kanoore Edul VS, Caminos Eguillor JF, Ferrara G et al (2020) Microcirculation alterations in severe COVID-19 pneumonia. J Crit Care 61:73–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.10.002
do Espirito Santo DA, Lemos ACB, Miranda CH (2020) In vivo demonstration of microvascular thrombosis in severe COVID-19. J Thromb Thrombolysis 50:790–794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-020-02245-x
Funding
This work was not funded.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both authors were involved in the conception, literature search, writing the manuscript and critically reviewing the manuscript and have made an equal contribution as authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest pertaining to this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
On behalf of ICODE - The International COVID-19 Thrombosis Biomarkers Colloquium.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Vandenbriele, C., Gorog, D.A. Screening for venous thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19. J Thromb Thrombolysis 52, 985–991 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-021-02474-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-021-02474-8