Abstract
After an initial treatment period for venous thromboembolism (VTE), indefinite anticoagulation may be considered, depending upon individual risks. The aim of the study was to determine if there is consensus amongst clinicians that manage VTE regarding which patients require 3–6 months versus indefinite anticoagulation. The importance of VTE site and severity in decision making was also evaluated. An international survey of clinicians involved in VTE management was undertaken. Respondents were asked about long-term treatment of six patients that had completed 3–6 months initial anticoagulation. These included four cases of VTE not associated with a major reversible risk factor and two control cases; one unprovoked VTE and one VTE associated with a major reversible risk factor. For consensus, there was a pre-defined equivalence boundary whereby at least 70% of clinicians had to decide either to stop or consider indefinite anticoagulation for each case. 351 responses were collected. In the control cases, there was a ≥ 95% consensus on long-term management (stop versus indefinite anticoagulation). In three of the four test cases, there was no consensus about duration of anticoagulation. In case 3, 78% (99% confidence interval 73–84%) would stop anticoagulation after 3–6 months. When analysed by grade or specialty of doctor, a lack of consensus remained. Opinion on whether site or severity of VTE influenced decision making was variable. For patients with unprovoked VTE or VTE associated with a major transient risk factor there is treatment consensus. For the remainder, there is a lack consensus regarding the need for indefinite anticoagulation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kearon C, Akl EA, Ornleas J, Blavias A, Jimenez D, Bounameaux H et al (2016) Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 149:315–352
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2015). Venous thromboembolic diseases: diagnosis, management and thrombophilia testing. Clinical guideline 144. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg144. Accessed 31 Dec 2019.
Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, Bueno H, Geersing GJ, Harjola VP, ESC Scientific Document Group et al (2019) 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz405
Rodger MA, Le Gal G (2018) Who should get long-term anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism and with what? Blood Adv 2:3081–3087
Iorio A, Kearon C, Filippucci E, Marcucci M, Macura A, Pengo V et al (2010) Risk of recurrence after a first episode of symptomatic venous thromboembolism provoked by a transient risk factor. Arch Intern Med 170:1710–1716
Khan F, Rahman A, Carrier M, Kearon C, Weitz JI, Schulman S et al (2019) Long term risk of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism after discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment for first unprovoked venous thromboembolism event: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 366:l4363
Kearon C, Ageno W, Cannegieter SC, Cosmi B, Geersing G-J, Kyrle PA, for the Subcommittees on Control of Anticoagulation, and Predictive, and Diagnostic Variables in Thrombotic Disease (2016) Categorization of patients as having provoked or unprovoked venous thromboembolism: guidance from the SSC of ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 14:1480–1483
Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77–101
Kearon C, Iorio A, Palareti G, Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation of the SSC of the ISTH (2010) Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism after stopping treatment in cohort studies: recommendation for acceptable rates and standardized reporting. J Thromb Haemost. 8:2313–2315
Prins MH, Lensing AWA, Prandoni P, Wells PS, Verhamme P, Beyer-Westendorf J et al (2018) Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism according to baseline risk factor profiles. Blood Adv 2:788–796
Braekkan SK, Hansen JB (2018) Substantial recurrence risk after venous thromboembolism provoked by minor risk factors. J Thromb Haemost 16:1671–1673
Bornstein BH, Emler AC (2001) Rationality in medical decision making: a review of the literature on doctors’ decision-making biases. J Eval Clin Pract 7(2):97–107
Blondon M, Jiménez H, Robert-Ebadi H, Del Toro J, Lopez-Jimenez L, Falga C et al (2019) Long-term clinical prognosis of Massive and Non-massive pulmonary embolism: a registry-based cohort study. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 3(Suppl. 1):1–4
Thomas W, Firth O, Besser M, Beveridge M, Baglin T (2017) Analysis of pulmonary embolus size at the time of recurrence compared with presentation: a single-centre retrospective study. J Thromb Haemost 15:1443–1447
Gouin B, Blondon M, Jiménez D, Fernández-Capitán C, Bounameaux H, Soler S, RIETE Investigators et al (2017) Clinical prognosis of nonmassive central and noncentral pulmonary embolism: a Registry-Based Cohort Study. Chest 151:829–837
Lutsey PL, Horvath KJ, Fullam L, Moll S, Rooney MR, Cushman M et al (2018) Anticoagulant preferences and concerns among venous thromboembolism patients. Thromb Haemost 118:553–561
Rodger MA, Le Gal G, Anderson DR, Schmidt J, Pernod G, Kahn SR et al (2017) Validating the HERDOO2 rule to guide treatment duration for women with unprovoked venous thrombosis: multinational prospective cohort management study. BMJ 356:j1065
Bickmann JK, Baglin T, Meijers JCM, Renné T (2017) Novel targets for anticoagulants lacking bleeding risk. Curr Opin Hematol 24:419–426
Weitz JI, Lensing AWA, Prins MH, Bauersachs R, Beyer-Westendorf J, Bounameaux H, EINSTEIN CHOICE Investigators et al (2017) Rivaroxaban or aspirin for extended treatment of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 376:1211–1222
Agnelli G, Buller HR, Cohen A, Curto M, Gallus AS, Johnson M, AMPLIFY-EXT Investigators et al (2013) Apixaban for extended treatment of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 368:699–708
Thomas W, Symington E, Besser M, Sheares K (2019) Real world experience at a single centre using low dose direct oral anticoagulants after unprovoked venous thromboembolism. Br J Haematol 186:e39–e41
de Winter MA, Remme GC, Kaasjager K, Nijkeuter M (2019) Short-term versus extended anticoagulant treatment for unprovoked venous thromboembolism: A survey on guideline adherence and physicians' considerations. Thromb Res. 183:49–55
Bethlehem J (2010) Selection bias in web surveys. Int Stat Rev 78(2):161–188
Acknowledgements
We thank the following organisations who helped with circulating the survey to our clinical colleagues; Thrombosis UK, Thrombosis Ireland, HaemSTAR, British Thoracic Society, VTE Dublin, INViTE and INVENT-VTE. We thank our colleagues who completed the survey and that helped circulate it, especially Professor Beverley Hunt, Professor Mike Makris, Professor Saskia Middeldorp, Professor Fionnuala Ní Áinle, Dr Michelle Lavin & Professor Roopen Arya.
Funding
No funding was received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
EB-H, AS, KS, MC, WT designed the study and had intellectual input. AA performed statistical analysis. EB-H created the online survey and code to randomise the question order. MG has had intellectual input and critically appraised the manuscript. WT wrote the first draft of the manuscript and all authors approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
EB-H works full time for the NHS but is seconded 50% of his time to GSK. AA, AS, MG, MC—none to declare. KS—educational support from Actelion, Bayer and GSK, advisory board and speaker's honorarium from Actelion. WT—honorarium from Bayer and Pfizer & advisory board for Daiichi Sankyo.
Ethical approval
This study had approval from the Cambridge University Hospitals (CUH) research and development (R&D) department and Human Research Authority (IRAS: 266358). National Health Service research ethics committee approval was not required because this was a clinician survey; however, the study had a favourable internal ethical review at the CUH R&D department.
Consent to participate
Consent to participate was gained by all participants on the online platform prior to taking the survey.
Consent for publication
Participants consented to publication.
Code availability
Statistical package R version 3.6.1 on a windows computer.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Banham-Hall, E., Allison, A., Santarsieri, A. et al. An international survey of clinicians regarding their management of venous thromboembolism following the initial 3–6 months of anticoagulation. J Thromb Thrombolysis 51, 17–24 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-020-02193-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-020-02193-6