Skip to main content
Log in

Direct oral anticoagulants more effective than low-molecular-weight heparin for venous thrombo-embolism in cancer: an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials

  • Published:
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the recent past, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was the first choice in the treatment of cancer related venous thrombo-embolism (VTE). Evidence supporting the preferential use of direct anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with cancer, instead, is less robust so far. We therefore aimed to assess in an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials whether the use of DOACs may be associated with a more favorable profile when compared to LMWH. We performed a meta-analysis of RCTs enrolling patients with VTE and cancer. We assessed Mantel–Haenszel pooled estimates of risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs for recurrence of VTE, major bleeding, and mortality comparing subjects treated with DOACs with those with LMWH. After study selection, three RCTs (HOKUSAI-Cancer, SELECT-D and ADAM-VTE) were included for the analysis with an overall population of 1739 patients. DOACs patients had a lower incidence of 6-month recurrent VTE when compared to LMWHs (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40–0.79; p < 0.001). Incidence of major bleeding was not significantly different between DOACs and LMWH treated patients (RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.95–2.47, p = n.s.), and mortality rates were comparable (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.91–2.47, p = n.s.). In a meta-analysis of RCTs therapy with DOACs was superior to LMWH in terms of efficacy and lower recurrence of VTE with a comparable safety profile in terms of bleeding events and complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee AY, Levine MN (2003) Venous thromboembolism and cancer: risks and outcomes. Circulation 107:I17–I21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Timp JF, Braekkan SK, Versteeg HH, Cannegieter SC (2013) Epidemiology of cancer-associated venous thrombosis. Blood 122:1712–1723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee AYY, Kamphuisen PW, Meyer G, Bauersachs R, Janas MS, Jarner MF, Khorana AA, CATCH Investigators (2015) Tinzaparin vs warfarin for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in patients with active cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314:677–686

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee AY, Levine MN, Baker RI, Bowden C, Kakkar AK, Prins M, Rickles FR, Julian JA, Haley S, Kovacs MJ, Gent M (2003) Randomized comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin versus oral anticoagulant therapy for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer (CLOT) investigators. Low-molecular-weight heparin versus a coumarin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med 349:146–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Khorana AA, Yannicelli D, McCrae KR, Milentijevic D, Crivera C, Nelson WW, Schein JR (2016) Evaluation of US prescription patterns: are treatment guidelines for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism being followed? Thromb Res 145:51–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, Hoffman EB, Deenadayalu N, Ezekowitz MD, Camm AJ, Weitz JI, Lewis BS, Parkhomenko A, Yamashita T, Antman EM (2014) Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 383:955–962

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen AT, Hamilton M, Mitchell SA, Phatak H, Liu X, Bird A, Tushabe D, Batson S (2015) Comparison of the novel oral anticoagulants apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban in the initial and long-term treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 10:e0144856

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brunetti ND, Gesuete E, De Gennaro L, Correale M, Caldarola P, Gaglione A, Di Biase M (2017) Direct oral anti-coagulants compared with vitamin-K inhibitors and low-molecular-weight-heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis study. Int J Cardiol 230:214–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Raskob GE, van Es N, Verhamme P, Carrier M, Di Nisio M, Garcia D, Grosso MA, Kakkar AK, Kovacs MJ, Mercuri MF, Meyer G, Segers A, Shi M, Wang TF, Yeo E, Zhang G, Zwicker JI, Weitz JI, Büller HR (2018) Hokusai VTE cancer investigators. Edoxaban for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 378:615–624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Young A, Marshall A, Thirlwall J, Hill C, Hale D, Dunn J, Lokare A, Kakkar AK, Levine MN, Chapman O (2017) Anticoagulation therapy in selected cancer patients at risk of recurrence of venous thromboembolism: results of the select-D™ pilot trial. Blood 130(Suppl 1):625

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li A, Garcia DA, Lyman GH, Carrier M (2019) Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) versus low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for treatment of cancer associated thrombosis (CAT): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Res 173:158–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vedovati MC, Giustozzi M, Bonitta G, Agnelli G, Becattini C (2018) Efficacy and safety of anticoagulant agents in patients with venous thromboembolism and cancer: a network meta-analysis. Thromb Res 170:175–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. https://ash.confex.com/ash/2018/webprogram/Paper118808.html. Accessed 24 Feb 2019

  14. Ntaios G, Papavasileiou V, Makaritsis K, Vemmos K, Michel P, Lip GYH (2017) Real-world setting comparison of nonvitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus vitamin-K antagonists for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 48:2494–2503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McBane Ii R, Loprinzi CL, Ashrani A, Perez-Botero J, Leon Ferre RA, Henkin S, Lenz CJ, Le-Rademacher JG, Wysokinski WE (2017) Apixaban and dalteparin in active malignancy associated venous thromboembolism. The ADAM VTE trial. Thromb Haemost 117:1952–1961

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Li A, Kuderer NM, Garcia DA, Khorana AA, Wells PS, Carrier M, Lyman GH (2019) Direct oral anticoagulant for the prevention of thrombosis in ambulatory patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.14613

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang Y, Lv H, Li D, Chen C, Gu G, Sun Y, Yang X, Liu Y, Fang F, Liu J, Tse G, Xia Y (2019) Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants for secondary prevention of cancer-associated thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies. Front Pharmacol 10:773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rossel A, Robert-Ebadi H, Combescure C, Grosgurin O, Stirnemann J, Addeo A, Garin N, Agoritsas T, Reny JL, Marti C (2019) Anticoagulant therapy for acute venous thrombo-embolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 14:e0213940

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natale Daniele Brunetti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors have no potential conflict of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brunetti, N.D., Tricarico, L., Correale, M. et al. Direct oral anticoagulants more effective than low-molecular-weight heparin for venous thrombo-embolism in cancer: an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Thromb Thrombolysis 50, 305–310 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-019-01974-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-019-01974-y

Keywords

Navigation