Skip to main content

Changes in treatment and outcomes after creation of a pulmonary embolism response team (PERT), a 10-year analysis

A Correction to this article was published on 30 November 2018

This article has been updated


Multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response teams (PERTs) are being implemented to improve care of patients with life-threatening PE. We sought to determine how the creation of PERT affects treatment and outcomes of patients with serious PE. A pre- and post-intervention study was performed using an interrupted time series design, to compare patients with PE before (2006–2012) and after (2012–2016) implementation of PERT at a university hospital. T-tests, Chi square tests and logistic regression were used to compare outcomes, and multivariable regression were used to adjust for differences in PE severity. Two-sided p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. For the interrupted time-series analysis, data was divided into mutually exclusive 6-month time periods (11 pre- and 7 post-PERT). To examine changes in treatment and outcomes associated with PERT, slopes and change points were compared pre- and post-PERT. Two-hundred and twelve pre-PERT and 228 post-PERT patients were analyzed. Patient demographics were generally similar, though pre-PERT, PE were more likely to be low-risk (37% vs. 19%) while post-PERT, PE were more likely to be submassive (32% vs. 49%). More patients underwent catheter directed therapy (1% vs. 14%, p = < 0.0001) or any advanced therapy (19 [9%] vs. 44 [19%], p = 0.002) post PERT. Interrupted time series analysis demonstrated that this increase was sudden and coincident with implementation of PERT, and most noticeable among patients with submassive PE. There were no differences in major bleeding or mortality pre- and post-PERT. While the use of advanced therapies, particularly catheter-directed therapies, increased after creation of PERT, especially among patients with submassive PE, there was no apparent increase in bleeding.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Change history

  • 30 November 2018

    The original version of the article unfortunately contained an error in conflict of interest. This erratum is published with the correct conflict of interest.


  1. Office of the Surgeon General (US), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US) (2008) The surgeon general’s call to action to prevent deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Office of the Surgeon General (US), Rockville

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pollack CV, Schreiber D, Goldhaber SZ et al (2011) Clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients diagnosed with acute pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: initial report of EMPEROR (multicenter emergency medicine pulmonary embolism in the real world registry). J Am Coll Cardiol 57(6):700–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stein PD, Matta F (2011) Epidemiology and incidence: the scope of the problem and risk factors for development of venous thromboembolism. Crit Care Clin 27(4):907–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Centers for Disease C, Prevention (2012) Venous thromboembolism in adult hospitalizations—United States, 2007–2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 61(22):401–404

    Google Scholar 

  5. Puurunen MK, Gona PN, Larson MG, Murabito JM, Magnani JW, O’Donnell CJ (2016) Epidemiology of venous thromboembolism in the Framingham Heart Study. Thromb Res 145:27–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, De Rosa M (1999) Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER). Lancet 353(9162):1386–1389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kline JA, Nordenholz KE, Courtney DM et al (2014) Treatment of submassive pulmonary embolism with tenecteplase or placebo: cardiopulmonary outcomes at 3 months: multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial. J Thromb Haemost 12(4):459–468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kucher N, Boekstegers P, Muller OJ et al (2014) Randomized, controlled trial of ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. Circulation 129(4):479–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuo WT, Banerjee A, Kim PS et al (2015) Pulmonary embolism response to fragmentation, embolectomy, and catheter thrombolysis (PERFECT): initial results from a prospective multicenter registry. Chest 148(3):667–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Leacche M, Unic D, Goldhaber SZ et al (2005) Modern surgical treatment of massive pulmonary embolism: results in 47 consecutive patients after rapid diagnosis and aggressive surgical approach. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129(5):1018–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Meyer G, Vicaut E, Danays T et al (2014) Fibrinolysis for patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 370(15):1402–1411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharifi M, Bay C, Skrocki L, Rahimi F, Mehdipour M, Investigators M (2013) Moderate pulmonary embolism treated with thrombolysis (from the “MOPETT” Trial). Am J Cardiol 111(2):273–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Piazza G, Hohlfelder B, Jaff MR et al (2015) A prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial of ultrasound-facilitated, catheter-directed, low-dose fibrinolysis for acute massive and submassive pulmonary embolism: the SEATTLE II study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8(10):1382–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kabrhel C, Jaff MR, Channick RN, Baker JN, Rosenfield K (2013) A multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response team. Chest 144(5):1738–1739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kabrhel C, Rosovsky R, Channick R et al (2016) A multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response team (PERT)-initial 30-month experience with a novel approach to delivery of care to patients with sub-massive and massive PE. Chest 150(2):384–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Provias T, Dudzinski DM, Jaff MR et al (2014) The massachusetts general hospital pulmonary embolism response team (MGH PERT): creation of a multidisciplinary program to improve care of patients with massive and submassive pulmonary embolism. Hosp Pract 42(1):31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Monteleone PP, Rosenfield K, Rosovsky RP (2016) Multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response teams and systems. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 6(6):662–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bloomer TL, Thomassee EJ, Fong PP (2015) Acute pulmonary embolism network and multidisciplinary response team approach to treatment. Crit Pathw Cardiol 14(3):90–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dudzinski DM, Piazza G (2016) Multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response teams. Circulation 133(1):98–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Witkin AS, Harshbarger S, Kabrhel C (2016) Pulmonary embolism response teams. Semin Thromb Hemost 42(8):857–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Barnes G, Giri J, Courtney DM et al (1995) Nuts and bolts of running a pulmonary embolism response team: results from an organizational survey of the National PERT Consortium members. Hosp Pract 2017:1–5

  22. Barnes GD, Kabrhel C, Courtney DM et al (2016) Diversity in the pulmonary embolism response team model: an organizational survey of the national PERT consortium members. Chest 150(6):1414–1417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42(2):377–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kabrhel C, Okechukwu I, Hariharan P et al (2014) Factors associated with clinical deterioration shortly after PE. Thorax 69(9):835–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hariharan P, Takayesu JK, Kabrhel C (2011) Association between the pulmonary embolism severity index (PESI) and short-term clinical deterioration. Thromb Haemost 105(4):706–711

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Jaff MR, McMurtry MS, Archer SL et al (2011) Management of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism, iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 123(16):1788–1830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kearon C, Akl EA, Ornelas J et al (2016) Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest 149(2):315–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A, Agnelli G et al (2014) 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J 35(43):3033–3069

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kuo WT, Gould MK, Louie JD, Rosenberg JK, Sze DY, Hofmann LV (2009) Catheter-directed therapy for the treatment of massive pulmonary embolism: systematic review and meta-analysis of modern techniques. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20(11):1431–1440

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank Janet McClintic, MHA, for the administrative support she provided for this work. They thank the employed research staff of the Center for Vascular Emergencies for their assistance with data collection: Erin Deadmon and Nicholas Giordano. They also greatly appreciate the efforts of the clinical fellows who contributed to the care of pulmonary embolism response team patients and the collection of data used in this manuscript: Michael Nguyen Young, Rasha Fahad Al-Bawardy, Mazen Albaghdadi, and Jorge Borges. None were compensated for their contributions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



RR had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Concept and design: Rosovsky, Chang, Kabrhel. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Rosovsky, Chang, Rosenfield, Channick, Jaff, Weinberg, Sundt, Witkin, Rodriguez-Lopez, Parry, Harshbarger, Hariharan, Kabrhel. Drafting of the manuscript: Rosovsky, Chang and Kabrhel. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Rosovsky, Chang, Rosenfield, Channick, Jaff, Weinberg, Sundt, Witkin, Rodriguez-Lopez, Parry, Harshbarger, Hariharan, Kabrhel. Final approval of the manuscript: Rosovsky, Chang, Rosenfield, Channick, Jaff, Weinberg, Sundt, Witkin, Rodriguez-Lopez, Parry, Harshbarger, Hariharan, Kabrhel. Statistical analysis: Chang.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel Rosovsky.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Chang, Channick, Weinberg, Witkin, Parry, Harshbarger, Hariharan declared that they have no conflict of interest. Rosovsky discloses the following relationships: grant recipient from Bristol Meyer Squibb and Janssen Pharmaceuticals; consultant to Bayer. Rosenfield discloses the following relationships: consultant to: Cardinal Health and SurModics; grants/contracts with Abbott Vascular, Atrium, Lutonix/BARD, and The Medicines Company; equity with Access Closure, Inc., and AngioDynamics/Vortex; personal compensation from Cook, HCRI, and The Medicines Company; board member with VIVA Physicians. Jaff discloses the following relationships: non compensated advisor to Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Cordis, and Medtronic; equity with Vascular Therapies, PQ Bypass, Valiant Medical, and Primacea; board Member with VIVA Physicians (a 501 c 3 not-for-profit education and research). Sundt discloses the following relationship: consultant to Thrasos Therapeutics. Rodriguez-Lopez discloses the following relationships: Grant Support-Actelion pharmaceuticals. Consulting- Gilead pharmaceuticals. Kabrhel discloses the following relationships: consultant to Diagnostica Stago, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Siemens, Pfizer, and Portola Pharmaceuticals; grant recipient from Diagnostica Stago, Siemens Healthcare, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and Boehringer-Ingelheim.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not necessary or obtained as this was part of our program’s quality assurance/quality initiative and was a non interventional study.

Research involving human participants

All studies were approved by the Human Research Committee of Partners HealthCare Inc. (2012-P-002257, 2008-P-002001).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rosovsky, R., Chang, Y., Rosenfield, K. et al. Changes in treatment and outcomes after creation of a pulmonary embolism response team (PERT), a 10-year analysis. J Thromb Thrombolysis 47, 31–40 (2019).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


  • Pulmonary embolism
  • Pulmonary embolism response team
  • PERT
  • Treatment
  • Thrombolysis