Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison between two-point and three-point compression ultrasound for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis

  • Published:
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a frequent cause of admission to the emergency departments (ED). Although the gold standard for diagnosis is the Duplex ultrasound examination, the current study used for diagnosis of DVT in the ED by emergency physicians is the point-of-care compression ultrasound (POCUS). To compare the sensitivity and specificity of the two-point and three-point compression ultrasound (2PCUS and 3PCUS respectively) for diagnosis of lower extremity DVT in an ED management. We prospectively recruited outpatients who were admitted to the ED with suspected lower extremity DVT. Each patient underwent 2PCUS and 3PCUS performed by a trained ED physician. The ED physician recorded the results and then referred the patient to the vascular clinic for the Duplex ultrasound examination. 195 patients recruited to this study between July 2015 and June 2016 in the ED of Rabin Medical Center-Beillinson Hospital, Israel. DVT was diagnosed by Duplex examination in 48 of 195 patients (24.6%). There were significant correlations among the findings regarding the deep veins on both the 2PCUS and 3PCUS tests and on the Duplex examination (p < 0.001). DVT at any vein was correctly diagnosed with the 2PCUS in 38 of48 patients with positive findings on Duplex examination and incorrectly diagnosed (false positive) in 2 of 133 patients without DVT (sensitivity 82.76%, specificity 98.52%). DVT was correctly diagnosed with the 3PCUS in 43 of 48 DVT and incorrectly diagnosed (false positive) in 2 of133 patients without DVT (sensitivity 90.57%, specificity 98.52%). The sensitivity of the 3PCUS was significantly higher than the 2PCUS (p < 0.001), while the specificity was similar. A short training is satisfactory for achieving a good clinical capability to identify DVT by ED physicians. The 3PCUS examination preformed in the ED, is a noninvasive, accurate and quick diagnostic test for evaluation of patients presenting with signs and symptoms suggestive of a DVT. By Using 3PCUS, the ED physicians may decrease time to diagnosis, definitive care and length of stay in the ED.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Modified from: http://accessanesthesiology.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=517&sectionid=4106680

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bache JB, Armitt C, Gadd C. Handbook of emergency department procedures, Elseiver, Amsterdam ISBN: 0-7234-3322-4

  2. Mahadevan SV. An introduction to clinical emergency medicine: guide for practitioners in the emergency department. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge ISBN: 0-521-54259-6

  3. Anderson FA Jr, Wheeler HB, Goldberg RJ et al (1991) A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The Worcester DVT Study. Arch Intern Med 151:933–938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yamaki T, Nozaki M, Sakurai H et al (2009) Presence of lower limb deep vein thrombosis and prognosis in patients with symptomatic pulmonary embolism: preliminary report. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 37:225–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goodacre S, Sutton AJ, Sampson FC (2005) Meta-analysis: the value of clinical assessment in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 143:129–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hull R, Hirsch J, Sackett DL et al (1981) Clinical validity of a negative venogram in patients with clinically suspected venous thrombosis. Circulation 64:622–625

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Seidel AC, Cavalheri G Jr, Miranda F Jr (2008) The role of duplex ultrasonography in the diagnosis of lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis in non-hospitalized patients. Int Angiol 27:377–384

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. de Oliveira A, França GJ, Vidal EA et al (2008) Duplex scan in patients with clinical suspicion of deep venous thrombosis. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 6:53

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (2015) AIUM practice parameter for the performance of peripheral venous ultrasound examinations. http://www.aium.org/resources/guidelines/peripheralvenous.pdf

  10. Frederick MG, Hertzberg BS, Kliewer MA et al (1996) Can the US examination for lower extremity deep venous thrombosis be abbreviated? A prospective study of 755 examinations. Radiology 199:45–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Theodoro D, Blaivas M, Duggal S et al (2004) Real-time B-mode ultrasound in the ED saves time in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Am J Emerg Med 22:197–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Farahmand S, Farnia M, Shahriaran S et al (2011) The accuracy of limited B-mode compression technique in diagnosing deep venous thrombosis in lower extremities. Am J Emerg Med 29:687–690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. ACEP Policy Statement. Approved October (2008) Emergency ultrasound guidelines. https://www.emra.org/uploadedFiles/EMRA/committees-divisions/ultrasound/ACEP-2008-EUS-Guidelines.pdf

  14. Crowhurst TD, Dunn RJ (2013) Sensitivity and specificity of three-point compressio ultrasonography performed by emergency physicians for proximal lower extremity deep venous thrombosis. Emerg Med Australas 25:588–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cogo A, Lensing AW, Prandoni P et al (1993) Distribution of thrombosis in patients with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis. Implications for simplifying the diagnostic process with compression ultrasound. Arch Intern Med 153:2777–2780

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Blaivas M, Lambert MJ, Harwood RA et al (2000) Lower-extremity Doppler for deep venous thrombosis–can emergency physicians be accurate and fast? Acad Emerg Med 7:120–126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Magazzini S, Vanni S, Toccafondi S (2007) Duplex ultrasound in the emergency department for the diagnostic management of clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis. Acad Emerg Med 14:216–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Crisp JG, Lovato LM, Jang TB (2010) Compression ultrasonography of the lower extremity with portable vascular ultrasonography can accurately detect deep venous thrombosis in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 56:601–610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Burnside P, Brown M, Kline J (2008) Systematic review of emergency physician-performed ultrasonography for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis. Acad Emerg Med 15:493–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. West JR, Chilstrom ML (2015) What is the accuracy of emergency physician–performed ultrasonography for deep venous thrombosis? Ann Emerg Med 65:699–701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pomero F, Dentali F, Borretta V et al (2013) Accuracy of emergency physician-performed ultrasonography in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Haemost 109:137–145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zitek T, Baydoun J, Yepez S et al (2016) Mistakes and pitfalls associated with two-point compression ultrasound for deep vein thrombosis. West J Emerg Med 17:201–208

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Poley RA, Newbigging JL, Sivilotti ML (2014) Estimated effect of an integrated approach to suspected deep venous thrombosis using limited-compression ultrasound. Acad Emerg Med 21:971–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Abbasi S, Bolverdi E, Zare MA et al (2012) Comparison of diagnostic value of conventional ultrasonography by emergency physicians with Doppler ultrasonography by radiology physicians for diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. J Pak Med Assoc 62:461–465

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim DJ, Byyny RL, Rice CA et al (2016) Test characteristics of emergency physician-performed limited compression ultrasound for lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis. J Emerg Med 51:684–690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Department of Emergency Medicine, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, 39 Jabotinski St., 49100, Petah Tikva, Israel

    Rona Zuker-Herman, Yossi Shaya & Shachaf Shiber

  2. Internal Ward E, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, 39 Jabotinski St., 49100, Petah Tikva, Israel

    Irit Ayalon Dangur

  3. Emergency Department, Helen Schneider Children Hospital, Beilinson Campus, 39 Jabotinski St., 49100, Petah Tikva, Israel

    Ron Berant

  4. Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Rmat Aviv, 32886, Tel-Aviv, Israel

    Shachaf Shiber

  5. Vascular Surgery Department, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, 39 Jabotinski St., 49100, Petah Tikva, Israel

    Elinor Cohen Sitt & Libbi Baskin

Authors
  1. Rona Zuker-Herman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Irit Ayalon Dangur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ron Berant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elinor Cohen Sitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Libbi Baskin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yossi Shaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shachaf Shiber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shachaf Shiber.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All study authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zuker-Herman, R., Ayalon Dangur, I., Berant, R. et al. Comparison between two-point and three-point compression ultrasound for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. J Thromb Thrombolysis 45, 99–105 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-017-1595-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-017-1595-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation