An evaluation of patient self-testing competency of prothrombin time for managing anticoagulation: pre-randomization results of VA Cooperative Study #481–The Home INR Study (THINRS)
Prior studies suggest patient self-testing (PST) of prothrombin time (PT) can improve the quality of anticoagulation (AC) and reduce complications (e.g., bleeding and thromboembolic events). “The Home INR Study” (THINRS) compared AC management with frequent PST using a home monitoring device to high-quality AC management (HQACM) with clinic-based monitoring on major health outcomes. A key clinical and policy question is whether and which patients can successfully use such devices. We report the results of Part 1 of THINRS in which patients and caregivers were evaluated for their ability to perform PST. Study-eligible patients (n = 3643) were trained to use the home monitoring device and evaluated after 2–4 weeks for PST competency. Information about demographics, medical history, warfarin use, medications, plus measures of numeracy, literacy, cognition, dexterity, and satisfaction with AC were collected. Approximately 80% (2931 of 3643) of patients trained on PST demonstrated competency; of these, 8% (238) required caregiver assistance. Testers who were not competent to perform PST had higher numbers of practice attempts, higher cuvette wastage, and were less able to perform a fingerstick or obtain blood for the cuvette in a timely fashion. Factors associated with failure to pass PST training included increased age, previous stroke history, poor cognition, and poor manual dexterity. A majority of patients were able to perform PST. Successful home monitoring of PT with a PST device required adequate levels of cognition and manual dexterity. Training a caregiver modestly increased the proportion of patients who can perform PST.
KeywordsAnticoagulation Patient self-testing Atrial fibrillation Mechanical heart valve
- 4.Gadisseur APA, Breukink-Engbers WGM, van der Meer FJM, van den Besselaar AMH, Sturk A, Rosendaal FR (2003) Comparison of the quality of oral anticoagulant therapy through patient self-management and management by specialized anticoagulation clinics in the Netherlands: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Intern Med 163:2639–2646CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Samsa GP, Matchar DB, Dolor RJ et al (2004) A new instrument for measuring anticoagulation-related quality of life: development and preliminary validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2:22. http://www.hqlo.com/content/2/1/22
- 15.Harrell FE Jr (2001) Regression modeling strategies with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer-Verlag, Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 27.Dauphin C, Legault B, Jaffeaux P, Motreff P, Azarnoush K, Joly H, Geoffroy E, Abulet-Cuvelier B, Camillieri L, Lusson JR, Cassagnes J, de Riberolles C (2008) Comparison of INR stability between self-monitoring and standard laboratory method: preliminary results of a prospective study in 67 mechanical heart valve patients. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 101:753–761PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.Garcia-Alamino JM, Ward AM, Alonso-Coello P, Perera R, Bankhead C, Fitzmaurice D, Heneghan CJ (2010). Self-monitoring and self-management of oral anticoagulation (review). The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, Wiley LtdGoogle Scholar