Why do groups cooperate more than individuals to reduce risks?
- 366 Downloads
Previous research has discovered a curious phenomenon: groups cooperate less than individuals in a deterministic prisoner’s dilemma game, but cooperate more than individuals when uncertainty is introduced into the game. We conducted two studies to examine three possible processes that might drive groups to be more cooperative than individuals in reducing risks: group risk concern, group cooperation expectation, and pressure to conform to social norms. We found that ex post guilt aversion and ex-post blame avoidance cause group members to be more risk concerned than individuals under uncertainty. These concerns drive groups to choose the cooperation (and risk-reduction) strategy more frequently than individuals. Groups also have higher cooperation expectations for their corresponding groups than individuals have for their corresponding individuals. We found no evidence of pressure to conform to social norms driving groups to be more cooperative than individuals.
KeywordsGroup decision Uncertainty Risk Cooperation Experimental economics Interdependent security
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Kunreuther H. (2009) The weakest link: Managing risk through interdependent strategies. In: Kleindorfer P. R., Wind (Eds.) Y. (eds) Network challenge: Strategy, profit and risk in an interlinked world. Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
- Orbell, J., Dawes, R. (1981). Social dilemmas. In G. Stephenson & H. H. Davis (Eds.), Progress in Applied Social Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 37–65) New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Turner J. C. (1991) Social Influence. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove, CAGoogle Scholar