Skip to main content

Distributional orderings: an approach with seven flavors

Abstract

We examine individuals’ distributional orderings in a number of contexts. This is done by using a questionnaire-experiment that is presented to respondents in any one of seven “flavors” or interpretations of the basic distributional problem. The flavors include inequality, risk, social welfare and justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Amiel Y., Cowell F. A. (1999) Thinking about inequality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amiel, Y., & Cowell, F. A. (2002). Attitudes towards risk and inequality: A questionnaire-experimental approach. In F. Andersson & H. J. Holm (Eds.), Experimental economics: Financial markets, auctions, and decision making (Chap. 9, pp. 85–115). Dewenter: Kluwer.

  • Amiel Y., Cowell F. A. (2007) Social welfare and individual preferences under uncertainty: A questionnaire-experimental approach. Research on Economic Inequality 14: 345–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amiel Y., Cowell F. A., Gaertner W. (2009) To be or not to be involved: A questionnaire-experimental view on Harsanyi’s utilitarian ethics. Social Choice and Welfare 32: 299–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson A. B. (1970) On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory 2: 244–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosmans K. (2007) Comparing degrees of inequality aversion. Social Choice and Welfare 29: 405–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton H. (1920) Measurement of the inequality of incomes. The Economic Journal 30: 348–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta P. S., Sen A. K., Starrett D. A. (1973) Notes on the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory 6: 180–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi J. C. (1953) Cardinal utility in welfare economics and in the theory of risk-taking. Journal of Political Economy 61: 434–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi J. C. (1955) Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Journal of Political Economy 63: 309–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi J. C. (1977) Morality and the theory of rational behavior. Social Research 44: 623–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi J. C. (1978) Bayesian decision theory and utilitarian ethics. American Economic Review 68: 223–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolm S.-C. (1969) The optimal production of social justice. In: Margolis J., Guitton H. (eds) Public economics. Macmillan, London, pp 145–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall A. W., Olkin I. (1979) Inequalities: Theory and majorization. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulin H. (2003) Fair division and collective welfare. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyes P. (1994) Inequality-reducing and inequality-preserving transformations of incomes: Symmetric and individualistic transformations. Journal of Economic Theory 63: 271–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigou A. C. (1912) Wealth and welfare. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin J. (1991) Increasing risk: another definition. In: Chikn A. (Ed.) Progress in decision, utility and risk theory. Kluwer, Norwell, pp 239–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J. (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild M., Stiglitz J. E. (1970) Increasing risk: I. A definition. Journal of Economic Theory 2: 225–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. K., Foster J. E. (1997) On economic inequality (2nd ed.). Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1981) The framing of decision and the psychology of choice. Science 211: 453–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wulf Gaertner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amiel, Y., Cowell, F. & Gaertner, W. Distributional orderings: an approach with seven flavors. Theory Decis 73, 381–399 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-011-9243-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-011-9243-x

Keywords

JEL Classification