Abstract
An extensive literature overlapping economics, statistical decision theory and finance, contrasts expected utility [EU] with the more recent framework of mean–variance (MV). A basic proposition is that MV follows from EU under the assumption of quadratic utility. A less recognized proposition, first raised by Markowitz, is that MV is fully justified under EU, if and only if utility is quadratic. The existing proof of this proposition relies on an assumption from EU, described here as “Buridan’s axiom” after the French philosopher’s fable of the ass that starved out of indifference between two bales of hay. To satisfy this axiom, MV must represent not only “pure” strategies, but also their probability mixtures, as points in the (σ, μ) plane. Markowitz and others have argued that probability mixtures are represented sufficiently by (σ, μ) only under quadratic utility, and hence that MV, interpreted as a mathematical re-expression of EU, implies quadratic utility. We prove a stronger form of this theorem, not involving or contradicting Buridan’s axiom, nor any more fundamental axiom of utility theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baron D. P. (1977) On the utility theoretic foundations of mean-variance analysis. Journal of Finance 32: 1683–1697
Barucci E. (2003) Financial markets theory: Equilibrium, efficiency and information. Springer, London
DeGroot M. H. (1970) Optimal statistical decisions. McGraw-Hill, New York
Feldstein M. S. (1969) Mean-variance analysis in the theory of liquidity preference and portfolio selection. The Review of Economic Studies 1: 5–12
Fishburn P. C. (1979) On the foundations of mean-variance analysis. Theory and Decision 10: 99–111
Huang C. F., Litzenberger R. H. (1988) Foundations for financial economics. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Ingersoll J. E. (1987) Theory of financial decision making. Roman and Littlefield Publishers Inc, Savage, MD
Lengwiler Y. (2004) Microfoundations of financial economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Lindley D. V. (1990) The 1988 Wald memorial lectures: The present position in Bayesian statistics. Statistical Science 5: 44–89
Loeffler A. (1996) Variance aversion implies μ–σ2-criterion. Journal of Economic Theory 69: 532–539
Luenberger D. (1998) Investment science. Oxford UniversityPress, New York
Markowitz H. M. (1959) Portfolio selection: Efficient diversification of investments. Wiley, NewYork
Meyer J. (1987) Two-moment decision models and expected utility maximization. American Economic Review 77: 421–430
Mossin J. (1973) Theory of financial markets. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Pratt J. W., Raiffa H, Schlaifer R. (1995) Introduction to statistical decision theory (2nd ed.). The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Savage L. J. (1954) The foundations of statistics. Wiley, New York
Tobin J. (1958) Liquidity preference as behavior towards risk. Review of Economic Studies 25: 65–86
Von Neumman J., Morgenstern O. (1944) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnstone, D.J., Lindley, D.V. Elementary proof that mean–variance implies quadratic utility. Theory Decis 70, 149–155 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-010-9194-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-010-9194-7
Keywords
- Mean–variance
- Portfolio theory
- Expected utility
- Quadratic utility
- Randomized assets
- Lotteries
- Buridan’s ass