Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Expected Utility Consistent Extensions of Preferences

  • 103 Accesses

  • 4 Citations


We consider the problem of extending a (complete) order over a set to its power set. The extension axioms we consider generate orderings over sets according to their expected utilities induced by some assignment of utilities over alternatives and probability distributions over sets. The model we propose gives a general and unified exposition of expected utility consistent extensions whilst it allows to emphasize various subtleties, the effects of which seem to be underestimated – particularly in the literature on strategy-proof social choice correspondences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Barberà S. (1977), The manipulability of social choice mechanisms that do not leave too much to chance. Econometrica 45, 1572–1588

  2. Barberà S., Bossert W., Pattanaik P.K. (2004). Ranking sets of objects. In: Barberà S., Hammond P.J., Seidl C. (eds). Handbook of Utility Theory. Volume II Extensions. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 893–977

  3. Barberà S., Dutta B., Sen A. (2001), Strategy-Proof Social Choice Correspondences. Journal of Economic Theory 101, 374–394

  4. Benoit J.P. (2002), Strategic manipulation in voting games when lotteries and ties are permitted. Journal of Economic Theory, 102, 421–436

  5. Ching S., Zhou L. (2002), Multi-valued strategy-proof social choice rules. Social Choice and Welfare 19, 569–580

  6. Duggan J., Schwartz T. (2000), Strategic Manipulability without Resoluteness or Shared Beliefs: Gibbard-Satterthwaite Generalized. Social Choice and Welfare 17, 85–93

  7. Feldman A.M. (1980), Strongly nonmanipulable multi-valued collective choice rules. Public Choice 35, 503–509

  8. Fishburn P.C. (1972), Even-chance lotteries in social choice theory. Theory and Decision, 3, 18–40

  9. Gärdenfors P. (1976), Manipulation of social choice functions. Journal of Economic Theory 13, 217–228

  10. Pattanaik P.K. (1973), On the stability of sincere voting situations. Journal of Economic Theory 6, 558–574

  11. Kaymak B., Sanver M.R. (2003), Sets of alternatives as condorcet winners. Social Choice and Welfare 20(3): 477–494

  12. Kelly J. (1977), Strategy-proofness and social choice functions without single-valuedness. Econometrica 45, 439–446

  13. Taylor A.D. (2005), Social Choice and the Mathematics of Manipulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge England

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to M. Remzi Sanver.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Can, B., Erdamar, B. & Sanver, M.R. Expected Utility Consistent Extensions of Preferences. Theory Decis 67, 123–144 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-007-9066-y

Download citation


  • preferences over sets
  • expected utility consistency
  • strategy-proofness

JEL Classification

  • JEL D79