Skip to main content
Log in

Expected Utility Consistent Extensions of Preferences

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the problem of extending a (complete) order over a set to its power set. The extension axioms we consider generate orderings over sets according to their expected utilities induced by some assignment of utilities over alternatives and probability distributions over sets. The model we propose gives a general and unified exposition of expected utility consistent extensions whilst it allows to emphasize various subtleties, the effects of which seem to be underestimated – particularly in the literature on strategy-proof social choice correspondences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barberà S. (1977), The manipulability of social choice mechanisms that do not leave too much to chance. Econometrica 45, 1572–1588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barberà S., Bossert W., Pattanaik P.K. (2004). Ranking sets of objects. In: Barberà S., Hammond P.J., Seidl C. (eds). Handbook of Utility Theory. Volume II Extensions. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 893–977

    Google Scholar 

  • Barberà S., Dutta B., Sen A. (2001), Strategy-Proof Social Choice Correspondences. Journal of Economic Theory 101, 374–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit J.P. (2002), Strategic manipulation in voting games when lotteries and ties are permitted. Journal of Economic Theory, 102, 421–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ching S., Zhou L. (2002), Multi-valued strategy-proof social choice rules. Social Choice and Welfare 19, 569–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duggan J., Schwartz T. (2000), Strategic Manipulability without Resoluteness or Shared Beliefs: Gibbard-Satterthwaite Generalized. Social Choice and Welfare 17, 85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman A.M. (1980), Strongly nonmanipulable multi-valued collective choice rules. Public Choice 35, 503–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn P.C. (1972), Even-chance lotteries in social choice theory. Theory and Decision, 3, 18–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors P. (1976), Manipulation of social choice functions. Journal of Economic Theory 13, 217–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattanaik P.K. (1973), On the stability of sincere voting situations. Journal of Economic Theory 6, 558–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaymak B., Sanver M.R. (2003), Sets of alternatives as condorcet winners. Social Choice and Welfare 20(3): 477–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly J. (1977), Strategy-proofness and social choice functions without single-valuedness. Econometrica 45, 439–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor A.D. (2005), Social Choice and the Mathematics of Manipulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge England

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Remzi Sanver.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Can, B., Erdamar, B. & Sanver, M.R. Expected Utility Consistent Extensions of Preferences. Theory Decis 67, 123–144 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-007-9066-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-007-9066-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation