An Experimental Investigation of the Disparity Between WTA and WTP for Lotteries
- 206 Downloads
In this paper we experimentally investigate the disparity between willingness-to-accept (WTA) and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for risky lotteries. The direction of the income effect is reversed by endowing subjects with the highest price of a lottery when asking the WTP question. Our results show that the income effect is too small to be the only source of the disparity. Since the disparity concentrates on a subsample of subjects, parametric and nonparametric tests of the WTA-WTP ratio may lead to contradictory results. The disparity is significantly reduced when background risk is introduced. That is, putting subjects always into a risky position could improve the contingent valuation method, which is often concerned with the assessment of risky situations such as health risks, automobile safety, etc.
KeywordsWTA-WTP disparity lotteries background risk contingent valuation
JEL ClassificationC91 D81
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bateman, I. and Willis, K.G. (eds.) (1999), Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries, Oxford: Oxford University Press,Google Scholar
- Cummings, R.G., Brookshire, D.S. and Schulze, W.D. (eds.) (1986), Valuing Environmental Goods, An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method, Totowa: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
- Kahneman D., Knetsch J.L., Thaler R.H. (1991) The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5: 193–206Google Scholar
- Knetsch J.L. (1989) The endowment effect and evidence of nonreversible indifference curves. American Economic Review 79: 1277–1284Google Scholar
- Knetsch, J.L. (2000), Environmental valuations and standard theory: behavioral findings, context dependence and implications, International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 267–299.Google Scholar
- Shogren J.F, Shin S.Y., Hayes D.J., Kliebenstein J.B. (1994) Resolving differences in willingness to pay and willingness to accept. American Economic Review 84: 255–270Google Scholar
- Sugden, R. (1999), Alternatives to the neo-classical theory of choice, in Bateman, I. and Willis, K.G. (eds.), Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries, Oxford University Press: Oxford, Chapter 5.Google Scholar
- Traub S. (1999) Framing Effects in Taxation: An Empirical Study Using the German Income Tax Schedule. Physica, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
- Willig R.D. (1976) Consumer surplus without apology. Amercian Economic Review 66: 589–597Google Scholar