Advertisement

Theory and Decision

, Volume 63, Issue 4, pp 389–418 | Cite as

On the Robustness of the Winner’s Curse Phenomenon

  • Brit Grosskopf
  • Yoella Bereby-Meyer
  • Max Bazerman
Article

Abstract

We set out to find ways to help decision makers overcome the “winner’s curse,” a phenomenon commonly observed in asymmetric information bargaining situations, and instead found strong support for its robustness. In a series of manipulations of the “Acquiring a Company Task,” we tried to enhance decision makers’ cognitive understanding of the task. We did so by presenting them with different parameters of the task, having them compare and contrast these different parameters, giving them full feedback on their history of choices and resulting outcomes, and allowing them to interact with a human opponent instead of a computer program. Much to our surprise, none of these manipulations led to a better understanding of the task. Our results demonstrate and emphasize the robustness of the winner’s curse phenomenon.

Keywords

winner’s curse asymmetric information cognitive learning 

JEL Classification

C78 C91 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akerlof G. (1970) The market for lemons: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 84: 488–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allais P.M. (1953) The behavior of rational man in risky situations – A critique of the axioms and postulates of the American School. Econometrica 21: 503–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball S., Bazerman M., Carrol J. (1991), An evaluation of earning in the bilateral winner’s curse. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 48: 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balzer W.K., Doherty M.E., O’Connor R. (1989), Effects of cognitive feedback on performance. Psychological Bulletin 3: 410–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bazerman M.H., Curhan J.R., Moore D.A., Valley K.L. (2000), Negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology 51: 279–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bazerman M.H. (2002). Judgment in Managerial Decision Making (5th ed.). New York, John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  7. Bazerman M.H., Samuelson W.F. (1983). I won the auction but don’t want the prize. Journal of Conflict Resolution 27: 618–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bazerman M.H., Neale M.A. (1992) Negotiating Rationally. New York, The Free PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Bereby-Meyer, Y. and Grosskopf, B. (2007), Overcoming the Winner’s Curse: An Adaptive Learning Perspective, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  10. Bransford J.D., Franks J.J., Vye N.J., Sherwood R.D. (1989). New approaches to instruction: Because wisdom can’t be told. In: Vosniadou S., Ortony A. (eds) Similarity and analogical reasoning. Cambridge, England, Cambridge University Press, pp. 470–497Google Scholar
  11. Bolton G., Ockenfels A. (2000) ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity and Competition. American Economic Review 90: 166–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brehmer B. (1980) In one word: Not from experience. Acta Psychologica 45: 223–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carroll J.S., Bazerman M.H., Maury R. (1988), Negotiator cognitions: A descriptive approach to negotiators’ understanding of their opponents. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 41: 352–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Camerer C.F., Ho T.H. (1999). Experience-Weighted Attraction (EWA) learning in normal-form games. Econometrica 67: 827–1874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coursey D.L., Hovis J.L., Schulze W.D. (1987) The disparity between willingness to accept and willingness to pay measures of values. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 102: 679–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Doherty, M.E. and Balzer, W.K. (1988), Cognitive feedback, in Brehmer, B. and Joyce, C.R.B. (eds.), Human Judgment: The SJT Approach, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  17. Einhorn H.J., Hogarth R.M. (1978). Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity. Psychological Review 85: 395–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fehr E., Schmidt K. (1999) A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 817–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fischbacher, U. (1999), z-Tree – Zurich Toolbox for Readymade Economic Experiments–Experimenter’s Manual, Experimental Economics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  20. Foreman P., Murnighan J.K. (1996), Learning to avoid the winner’s curse. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 67: 170–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gick M.L., Paterson K.J. (1992), Do contrasting facilitate schema acquisition and analogical transfer?. Canadian Journal of Psychology 46: 539–550Google Scholar
  22. Grosskopf B., Erev I., Yechiam E. (2006) Foregone with the Wind. International Journal of Game Theory 34: 285–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grosskopf, B. and Nagel, R. (2007), The Two-Person Beauty Contest, Games and Economic Behavior, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  24. Hammond, K.R., Stewart, T.R., Brehmer, B. and Steinmann, D.O. (1975), Social judgment theory, in Kaplan and Schwartz, S. (eds.), Human Judgment and Decision Processes, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hammond K.R., Summers D.A., Deane D.H. (1973), Negative effects of outcome-feedback in multiple-cue probability learning. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 9: 30–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heller, D. and Sarin, R. (2001), Adaptive Learning with Indirect Payoff Information, mimeo.Google Scholar
  27. Hoffman P.J., Earle T.C., Slovic P. (1981), Multidimensional functional learning (MFL) and some new conceptions of feedback. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 27: 75–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Idson L., Chugh D., Moran S., Bereby-Meyer Y, Grosskopf B., Bazerman M.H. (2004), Overcoming focusing failures in competitive environments. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 17: 159–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kagel, J.H. (1995), Auctions: A survey of experimental research, in Kagel, J. H. and Roth, A.E. (eds.), The Handbook of Experimental Economics.Google Scholar
  30. Kagel J.H., Levin D. (1986) The winner’s curse and public information in common value auctions. American Economic Review 76: 894–920Google Scholar
  31. Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1979), Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47: 263–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kluger A.N., DeNisi A. (1996) The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin 119: 254–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ross B.H., Kilbane M.C. (1997), Effects of principle explanation and superficial similarity on analogical mapping in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23: 427–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roth A.E., Erev I. (1995), Learning in extensive form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term. Games and Economic Behavior 8: 164–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Samuelson, W.F. and Bazerman, M.H. (1985), Negotiation under the winner’s curse, in Smith, V. (ed.), Research in Experimental Economics, Vol. III, JAI Press: Greenwich, CT.Google Scholar
  36. Schotter, A. and Sopher, B. (2001), Advice and Behavior in Intergenerational Ultimatum Games: An Experimental Approach, mimeo.Google Scholar
  37. Selten R., Abbink K., Cox R. (2005), Learning direction theory and the Winner’s Curse. Experimental Economics 8: 5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith V.L. (1985) Experimental Economics: Reply. American Economic Review 75: 265–272Google Scholar
  39. Tennyson R.D. (1973), Effect of negative instances in concept acquisition using a verbal learning task. Journal of Educational Psychology 64: 247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thompson L., Gentner D., Loewenstein J. (2000), Analogical training more powerful than individual case training. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82: 60–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tor A., Bazerman M.H. (2003) Focusing failures in competitive environments: explaining decision errors in the Monty Hall Game, the acquiring a company problem, and multi-party ultimatums. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 16: 353–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1974), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185: 251–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1986), Rational choice and the framing of the decisions. Journal of Business 59: 251–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. VanderStoep S.W., Seifert C.M. (1993) Learning “how” versus learning “when”: Improving transfer of problem-solving principles. The Journal of Learning Sciences 3: 93–111Google Scholar
  45. Winston P.H. (1975) Learning structural descriptions from examples. In: Winston P.H. (ed). The Psychology of Computer Vision. New York, McGraw-Hill, pp.157–210Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brit Grosskopf
    • 1
  • Yoella Bereby-Meyer
    • 2
  • Max Bazerman
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.Ben Gurion University of the NegevBeer ShevaIsrael
  3. 3.Harvard Business SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations