Skip to main content

An Alternative Model of the Formation of Political Coalitions

Abstract

Most models of the formation of political coalitions use either Euclidean spaces or rely purely on game theory. This limits their applicability. In this article, a single model is presented which is more broadly applicable. In principle any kind of set can be used as a policy space. The model is also able to incorporate different kinds of party motivations: both rent-seeking and idealism. The model uses party preferences and power to identify stable coalitions and predict government policy as well as to indicate which member of the opposition will be able to break up the governing coalition if no stable coalition exists. In the latter case it will also indicate on which issue the government is likely to split. Parties may have preferences over issues such as the composition of cabinet and/or the governing coalition as well as the more traditional issues of government formation. The model also provides a rationale for log-rolling.

References

  • Baron D. (1991), A spatial bargaining theory of government formation in parliamentary systems. American Political Science Review. 8(1): 137–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Berghammer, R., Rusinowska, A. and De Swart, H. (forthcoming). Applying relational algebra and RelView to coalition formation, European Journal of Operational Research.

  • Black D. (1958). The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brams S. (1975). Game Theory and Politics. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • De Swaan A. (1973). Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formation. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper & Row Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy P. (1991). Democracy, Bureaucracy and Public Choice: Economic Explanations in Political Science. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hertfordshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman P. (1997). A note on voting. Mathematical Social Sciences 34: 37–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eklund, P., Rusinowska, A., De Swart, H. A Consensus Model of Political Decision-making. Umea University/Tilburg University, Mimeo

  • Hotelling H. (1929). Stability in competition. The Economic Journal 39: 41–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilgour D. (1974). A shapley value for cooperative games with quarreling. In: Rapoport A. (eds.), Game Theory as a Theory of Conflict Resolution. Reidel, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchsteiger G., Puppe C. (1997). On the formation of political coalitions. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 153: 293–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurelle A., Valenciano F. (2005). Assessing success and decisiveness in voting situations. Social Choice and Welfare 24: 171–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laver M., Shepsle A. (1996). Making and Breaking Governments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey R. (1976), Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models and some implications for agenda control. Journal of Economic Theory 12: 472–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ordeshook P. (1997). The spatial analysis of elections and committees: four decades of research. In: Mueller D. (eds.) Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Peleg B. (1981) Coalition formation in simple games with dominant players. International Journal of Game Theory 10: 11–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plott C. (1967). A notion of equilibrium and its possibility under majority rule. American Economic Review 57: 787–806

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker W. (1962), The Theory of Political Coalitions. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubens, M., Rusinowska, A. and De Swart, H. (forthcoming). Using MACBETH to determine utilities of governments to parties in coalition formation, European Journal of Operational Research.

  • Rusinowska A., De Swart H., Van der Rijt J. (2005), A new model of coalition formation. Social Choice and Welfare 24: 129–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusinowska, A. and De Swart, H. Negotiating a Stable Government – an Application of Bargaining Theory to a Coalition Formation model, Tilburg University, Mimeo.

  • Taylor M., Laver M. (1973), Government coalitions in western Europe. European Journal of Political Research 1: 205–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thijssen, J., Hendrickx, R. and Borm, P. (2002), Spillovers and strategic cooperative behaviour, CentER discussion paper No. 2002-70. Tilburg University.

  • Van Deemen A. (1989), Dominant players and minimum size coalitions. European Journal of Political Research 17: 313–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittman D. (1995), The Myth of Democratic Failure, Why Political Institutions Are Efficient. American Politics and Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan-Willem Van Der Rijt.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Der Rijt, JW. An Alternative Model of the Formation of Political Coalitions. Theor Decis 64, 81–101 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-007-9026-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-007-9026-6

Keywords

  • political coalitions
  • government formation
  • coalition formation
  • log-rolling
  • government policy