Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Error Propagation in the Elicitation of Utility and Probability Weighting Functions

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Elicitation methods in decision-making under risk allow us to infer the utilities of outcomes as well as the probability weights from the observed preferences of an individual. An optimally efficient elicitation method is proposed, which takes the inevitable distortion of preferences by random errors into account and minimizes the effect of such errors on the inferred utility and probability weighting functions. Under mild assumptions, the optimally efficient method for eliciting utilities and probability weights is the following three-stage procedure. First, a probability is elicited whose subjective weight is one half. Second, the utility function is elicited through the midpoint chaining certainty equivalent method using the probability elicited at the first stage. Finally, the probability weighting function is elicited through the probability equivalent method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • M. Abdellaoui (2000) ArticleTitleParameter-free elicitation of utility and probabilitity weighting functions Management Science 46 1497–1512 Occurrence Handle10.1287/mnsc.46.11.1497.12080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H. and Paraschiv, C. (2004). Measuring loss aversion under prospect theory: parameter-free approach, GRID, ESTP & ENSAM Working Paper.

  • H. Bleichrodt J.L. Pinto (2000) ArticleTitleA parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis Management Science 46 1485–1496 Occurrence Handle10.1287/mnsc.46.11.1485.12086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Camerer (1989) ArticleTitleAn experimental test of several generalized utility theories Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2 61–104 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00055711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Etchart-Vincent (2004) ArticleTitleIs probability weighting sensitive to the magnitude of consequences? An experimental investigation on losses Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 28 217–235 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:RISK.0000026096.48985.a3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Farquhar (1984) ArticleTitleUtility assessment methods Management Science 30 1283–1300

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Fennema M. assen Particlevan (1998) ArticleTitleMeasuring the utility of losses by means of the trade-off method Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 17 277–296 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1007739018615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Gonzalez G. Wu (1999) ArticleTitleOn the shape of the probability weighting function Cognitive Psychology 38 129–166 Occurrence Handle10.1006/cogp.1998.0710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Ghirardato F. Maccheroni M. Marinacci M. Siniscalchi (2003) ArticleTitleA subjective spin on roulette wheels Econometrica 71 1897–1908 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1468-0262.00472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Harless C. Camerer (1994) ArticleTitleThe predictive utility of generalized expected utility theories Econometrica 62 1251–1289

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hershey P. Schoemaker (1985) ArticleTitleProbability versus certainty equivalence methods in utility measurement: Are they equivalent? Management Science 31 1213–1231

    Google Scholar 

  • J.D. Hey C. Orme (1994) ArticleTitleInvestigating generalisations of expected utility theory using experimental data Econometrica 62 1291–1326

    Google Scholar 

  • U. Karmarkar (1978) ArticleTitleSubjectively weighted utility: A descriptive extension of the expected utility model Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 21 61–72 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0030-5073(78)90039-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Keeney H. Raiffa (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs Wiley New York

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Krzysztofowicz L. Duckstein (1980) ArticleTitleStrength of preference and risk attitude in utility measurement Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 31 88–113 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0030-5073(83)90114-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. McCord R. Neufville Particlede (1986) ArticleTitle‘Lottery Equivalents’: Reduction of the certainty effect problem in utility assessment Management Science 32 56–60

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Quiggin (1982) ArticleTitleA theory of anticipated utility Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3 323–343 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0167-2681(82)90008-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Ronen (1973) ArticleTitleEffects of some probability displays on choices Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 9 1–15 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0030-5073(73)90032-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • V.L. Smith J. Walker (1993) ArticleTitleMonetary rewards and decision cost in experimental economics Economic Inquiry 31 245–261 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1465-7295.1993.tb00881.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ch. Starmer R. Sugden (1989) ArticleTitleProbability and juxtaposition effects: An experimental investigation of the common ratio effect Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2 159–178 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00056135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Tversky D. Kahneman (1992) ArticleTitleAdvances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5 297–323 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00122574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Winterfeldt Particlevon W. Edwards (1986) Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • P.P. Wakker D. Deneffe (1996) ArticleTitleEliciting von Neumann–Morgenstern utilities when probabilities are distorted or unknown Management Science 42 1131–1150 Occurrence Handle10.1287/mnsc.42.8.1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Wu (1994) ArticleTitleAn Empirical Test of Ordinal Independence Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 9 39–60 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01073402

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 30, CH-8006, Zurich, Switzerland

    Pavlo Blavatskyy

Authors
  1. Pavlo Blavatskyy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pavlo Blavatskyy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blavatskyy, P. Error Propagation in the Elicitation of Utility and Probability Weighting Functions. Theor Decis 60, 315–334 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-005-4593-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-005-4593-x

Keywords

Jel classification

Search

Navigation