Women are commonly stereotyped as more risk averse than men in financial decision making. In this paper we examine whether this stereotype reflects gender differences in actual risk-taking behavior by means of a laboratory experiment with monetary incentives. Gender differences in risk taking may be due to differences in valuations of outcomes or in probability weights. The results of our experiment indicate that value functions do not differ significantly between men and women. Men and women differ in their probability weighting schemes, however. In general, women tend to be less sensitive to probability changes. They also tend to underestimate large probabilities of gains more strongly than do men. This effect is particularly pronounced when the decisions are framed in investment terms. As a result, women appear to be more risk averse than men in specific circumstances.
Keywordsgender differences risk aversion financial decision making prospect theory probability weighting function
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Eckel, C.C., Grossman, P.J. 2005The difference in the economic decisions of men and women: Experimental evidencePlott, C.Smith, V.L. eds. Handbook of Experimental Economics ResultsNorth-HollandAmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Efron, B. 1979Bootstrap methods: Another look at the JackknifeAnnals of Statistics7126Google Scholar
- Fischbacher, U. (1999). Z-Tree. Zurich Toolbox for Readymade Economic Experiments. Institute of Empirical Economic Research, University of Zurich, Working Paper No. 21.Google Scholar
- Gysler, M., Brown Kruse, J. and Schubert, R. (2002). Ambiguity and gender differences in financial decision making: An experimental examination of competence and confidence effects. Center for Economic Research, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Working Paper.Google Scholar
- Moore, E. and Eckel, C. (2003). Measuring Ambiguity Aversion, mimeo.Google Scholar
- Schubert, R., Gysler, M., Brown, M. and Brachinger, H. W. (2000). Gender-specific attitudes towards risk and ambiguity: An experimental investigation. Center for Economic Research, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Working Paper.Google Scholar
- Siegel, S., Castellan, N.J.,Jr. 1988Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral SciencesMcGraw-HillNew YorkGoogle Scholar
- Wu G. and Markle A. B. (2004). An Empirical Test of Gain–Loss Separability in Prospect Theory, mimeo.Google Scholar