Skip to main content
Log in

Is the Disposition of Constrained Maximization Chosen Rationally?

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the most important issues in moral philosophy is whether morality can be justified by rationality. The purpose of this study is to examine Gauthier’s moral theory, focusing on the disposition of constrained maximization, which is the main thrust of his project to justify morality rationally. First of all, I shall investigate Gauthier’s assumption and condition for the rationality of the disposition of constrained maximization so as to disclose that the disposition of constrained maximization is not necessarily chosen by rational agents. Then I shall explore his other arguments including ones for the reinterpretation of rationality and the self-critical reflection of rational beings, which can be considered as his further efforts to make the disposition of constrained maximization a rational choice. By exploring them, I shall attempt to indicate that those arguments are not valid so long as he clings to the maximizing conception of rationality and thereby this conception of rationality itself is not enough to provide morality with a basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J. Charvert (1995) The Idea of an Ethical Community Cornell University Press Ithaca & London

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Darwall (1983) Impartial Reason Cornell University Press Ithaca & London

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Darwall (1997) Reasons, motives, and the demands of morality: an introduction S. Darwall A. Gibbard P. Railton (Eds) Moral Discourse and Practice: Some Philosophical Approaches. Oxford University Press New York & Oxford 305–312

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Dupre (1987) The Latest on the Best The MIT Press Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • H.G. Frankfurt (1982) Freedom of the will and the concept of a person Watson Gary (Eds) Free Will Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Gauthier (1967) ArticleTitleMorality and advantage Philosophical Review 76 460–475

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Gauthier (1986) Morals by Agreement Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Gauthier (1990) Moral Dealing Cornell University Press Ithaca & London

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Gauthier (1992) Morality, rational choice and semantic representation E.F. Paul F.D. Miller SuffixJr J. Paul J. Ahrens (Eds) The New Social Contract. Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Gauthier (1993) Uniting separate persons D. Gauthier R. Sudgen (Eds) Rationality, Justice and Social Contract. The University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Gert (1998) Morality: Its Nature and Justification Oxford University Press New York & Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Gibbard (1990) Wise choice, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Normative Judgment Harvard University Press Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • S.H. Heap M. Hollis B. Lyons R. Sudgen A. Weale (1992) The Theory of Choice: A Critical Guide Blackwell Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • C.M. Korsgaard (1996) The Sources of Normativity Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • A. MacIntyre (1984) After Virtue University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Mullen John M. Roth Byon (1991) The Decision Making: Its Logic and Practice Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Savage, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Parfit (1979) ArticleTitleIs common sense morality self-defeating? The Journal of Philosophy 76 IssueID10 533–545

    Google Scholar 

  • M.D. Resnik (1987) Choices University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis, MN

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Singer (1994) Ethics Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • J.H. Sobel (1993) ArticleTitleStraight versus constrained maximization Canadian Journal of Philosophy 23 IssueID1 25–54

    Google Scholar 

  • J.D. Vellman (1997) Deciding how to decide Cullity Garrett Gaut Berys (Eds) Ethics and Practical Reason. Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young-Ran Roh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roh, YR. Is the Disposition of Constrained Maximization Chosen Rationally?. Theor Decis 59, 19–41 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-005-3449-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-005-3449-8

Keywords

Navigation