Abstract
One of the most important issues in moral philosophy is whether morality can be justified by rationality. The purpose of this study is to examine Gauthier’s moral theory, focusing on the disposition of constrained maximization, which is the main thrust of his project to justify morality rationally. First of all, I shall investigate Gauthier’s assumption and condition for the rationality of the disposition of constrained maximization so as to disclose that the disposition of constrained maximization is not necessarily chosen by rational agents. Then I shall explore his other arguments including ones for the reinterpretation of rationality and the self-critical reflection of rational beings, which can be considered as his further efforts to make the disposition of constrained maximization a rational choice. By exploring them, I shall attempt to indicate that those arguments are not valid so long as he clings to the maximizing conception of rationality and thereby this conception of rationality itself is not enough to provide morality with a basis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Charvert (1995) The Idea of an Ethical Community Cornell University Press Ithaca & London
S. Darwall (1983) Impartial Reason Cornell University Press Ithaca & London
S. Darwall (1997) Reasons, motives, and the demands of morality: an introduction S. Darwall A. Gibbard P. Railton (Eds) Moral Discourse and Practice: Some Philosophical Approaches. Oxford University Press New York & Oxford 305–312
J. Dupre (1987) The Latest on the Best The MIT Press Cambridge, Mass
H.G. Frankfurt (1982) Freedom of the will and the concept of a person Watson Gary (Eds) Free Will Oxford University Press Oxford
D. Gauthier (1967) ArticleTitleMorality and advantage Philosophical Review 76 460–475
D. Gauthier (1986) Morals by Agreement Clarendon Press Oxford
D. Gauthier (1990) Moral Dealing Cornell University Press Ithaca & London
D. Gauthier (1992) Morality, rational choice and semantic representation E.F. Paul F.D. Miller SuffixJr J. Paul J. Ahrens (Eds) The New Social Contract. Oxford University Press Oxford
D. Gauthier (1993) Uniting separate persons D. Gauthier R. Sudgen (Eds) Rationality, Justice and Social Contract. The University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor
B. Gert (1998) Morality: Its Nature and Justification Oxford University Press New York & Oxford
A. Gibbard (1990) Wise choice, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Normative Judgment Harvard University Press Cambridge, Mass
S.H. Heap M. Hollis B. Lyons R. Sudgen A. Weale (1992) The Theory of Choice: A Critical Guide Blackwell Oxford
C.M. Korsgaard (1996) The Sources of Normativity Cambridge University Press Cambridge
A. MacIntyre (1984) After Virtue University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame
D. Mullen John M. Roth Byon (1991) The Decision Making: Its Logic and Practice Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Savage, Maryland
D. Parfit (1979) ArticleTitleIs common sense morality self-defeating? The Journal of Philosophy 76 IssueID10 533–545
M.D. Resnik (1987) Choices University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis, MN
P. Singer (1994) Ethics Oxford University Press Oxford
J.H. Sobel (1993) ArticleTitleStraight versus constrained maximization Canadian Journal of Philosophy 23 IssueID1 25–54
J.D. Vellman (1997) Deciding how to decide Cullity Garrett Gaut Berys (Eds) Ethics and Practical Reason. Clarendon Press Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roh, YR. Is the Disposition of Constrained Maximization Chosen Rationally?. Theor Decis 59, 19–41 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-005-3449-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-005-3449-8