Skip to main content
Log in

Finite Horizon Bargaining With Outside Options And Threat Points

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We characterize equilibrium behavior in a finite horizon multiple-pie alternating offer bargaining game in which both agents have outside options and threat points. In contrast to the infinite horizon case the strength of the threat to delay agreement is non-stationary and decreases over time. Typically the delay threat determines equilibrium proposals in early periods, while the threat to opt out characterizes those in later ones. Owing to this non-stationarity both threats may appear in the equilibrium shares immediately agreed upon in the first period. When the threat to opt out is empty for both agents, the outcome corresponds exactly with the (generalized) Nash bargaining solution. The latter observation may prove useful for designing experiments that are meant to test economic models that include a bargaining stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • K. Binmore P. Morgan A. Shaked J. Sutton (1991) ArticleTitleDo People Exploit their Bargaining Power? An Experimental Study Games and Economic Behavior 3 295–322

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Binmore A. Rubinstein A. Wolinski (1986) ArticleTitleThe Nash Bargaining Solution in Economic Modeling Rand Journal of Economics 17 176–188

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Binmore A. Shaked J. Sutton (1989) ArticleTitleAn Outside Option Experiment Quarterly Journal of Economics 104 753–770

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Camerer K. Weigelt (1996) An Asset Market Test of a Mechanism for Inducing Stochastic Horizons in Experiments R. Isaac (Eds) Research in Experimental Economics, Vol. 6 JAI Press Greenwich, CT 213–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Chiu B. Yang (1999) ArticleTitleThe Outside Option, Threat Point, and Nash Bargaining Solution Economics Letters 62 181–188

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Coles A. Muthoo (2003) ArticleTitleBargaining Equilibrium in a Non-stationary Environment Journal of Economic Theory 109 70–89

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Dalmazzo (1992) ArticleTitleOutside Options in a Bargaining Model with Decay in the Size of the Cake Economics Letters 40 417–421

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Ferstman D. Seidmann (1991) ArticleTitleDeadline Effects and Inefficient Delay in Bargaining with Endogenous Commitment Journal of Economic Theory 60 306–321

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Güth P. Ockenfels K. Ritzberger (1995) ArticleTitleOn Durable Goods Monopolies: An Experimental Study of Intrapersonal Price Competition and Price Discrimination Over Time Journal of Economic Psychology 16 247–274

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Hackett (1994) ArticleTitleIs Relational Exchange Possible in the Absence of Reputations and Repeated Contract? Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 10 360–389

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Harrington (1986) ArticleTitleA Non-cooperative Bargaining Game with Risk-averse Players and an Uncertain Finite Horizon Economics Letters 20 9–13

    Google Scholar 

  • O. Hart (1989) ArticleTitleBargaining and Strikes Quarterly Journal of Economics 104 25–43

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Jehiel B. Moldovanu (1995) ArticleTitleNegative Externalities may cause Delay in Negotiation Econometrica 63 1321–1335

    Google Scholar 

  • C.-T. Ma M. Manove (1993) ArticleTitleBargaining with Deadlines and Imperfect Player Control Econometrica 61 1313–1339

    Google Scholar 

  • W. MacLeod J. Malcomson (1995) ArticleTitleContract Bargaining with Symmetric Information Canadian Journal of Economics 28 336–367

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Malcomson (1997) ArticleTitleContracts, Holdup, and Labor Markets Journal of Economic Literature 35 1916–1957

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Mas-Colell M. Whinston J. Green (1995) Microeconomic Theory Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Moen (1998) ArticleTitleEfficient Ways to Finance Human Capital Investments Economica 65 491–505

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Muthoo (1999) Bargaining Theory with Applications Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Oosterbeek J. Sonnemans S. Velzen Particlevan (2003) ArticleTitleThe Need for Marriage Contracts: An Experimental Study Journal of Population Economics 16 431–453

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Osborne A. Rubinstein (1994) A Course in Game Theory MIT Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • M.J. Osborne A. Rubinstein (1990) Bargaining and Markets Academic Press San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Ponsati (1995) ArticleTitleThe Deadline Effect: A Theoretical Note Economics Letters 48 281–285

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Ponsati J. Sákovics (1998) ArticleTitleRubinstein Bargaining with Two-sided Outside Options Economic Theory 11 667–672

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Rapoport E. Weg D. Felsenthal (1990) ArticleTitleEffects of Fixed Costs in Two-person Sequential Bargaining Theory and Decision 28 47–71

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Rubinstein (1982) ArticleTitlePerfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model Econometrica 50 97–109

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Shaked (1994) ArticleTitleOpting Out: Bazaars Versus ‘High Tech’ Markets Investigaciones Económicas 18 421–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloof, R. (2002). Opting Out: An Experimental Comparison of Bazaars Versus High-tech Markets. WP 29/02, Scholar Working Paper Series, University of Amsterdam.

  • Sloof, R., Oosterbeek, H., Riedl, A. and Sonnemans, J. (2002). Breach Remedies, Reliance and Renegotiation. Scholar Working Paper Series WP 28/02.

  • R. Sloof J. Sonnemans H. Oosterbeek (2004) ArticleTitleSpecific Investments, Holdup, and the Outside Option Principle European Economic Review 48 1399–1410

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Sonnemans H. Oosterbeek R. Sloof (2001) ArticleTitleOn the Relation between Asset Ownership and Specific Investments Economic Journal 111 791–820

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Stahl (1972) Bargaining Theory Economics Research Institute at the Stockholm School of Economics Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Damme Particlevan R. Selten E. Winter (1990) ArticleTitleAlternating Bid Bargaining with a Smallest Money Unit Games and Economic Behavior 2 188–201

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Weg A. Rapoport D. Felsenthal (1990) ArticleTitleTwo-person Bargaining behavior in Fixed Discounting Factors Games with Infinite Horizon Games and Economic Behavior 2 76–95

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Zwick A. Rapoport J. Howard (1992) ArticleTitleTwo-person Sequential Bargaining Behavior with Exogenous Breakdown Theory and Decision 32 241–268

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Randolph Sloof.

Additional information

JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES: C78, C91.

The useful remarks of an anonymous referee greatly improved the presentation of the material and are gratefully acknowledged. The usual disclaimer applies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sloof, R. Finite Horizon Bargaining With Outside Options And Threat Points. Theor Decis 57, 109–142 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-004-4319-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-004-4319-5

Keywords

Navigation