Telecommunication Systems

, Volume 53, Issue 1, pp 55–60 | Cite as

Research on vertical handoff decision based on service history information and SINR for heterogeneous wireless networks

Article
  • 188 Downloads

Abstract

In this letter, we propose a SH (Service History) and SINR (Signal to Interference plus Noise Ratio) based PROMETHEE (SHS-PROMETHEE) vertical handoff (VHO) decision algorithm. An attribute matrix is constructed considering the SH information and the SINR in the source network and the equivalent SINR in the target network and so on. Handoff decision meeting multi-attribute QoS requirement is made according to the traffic features. The weight relation of decision elements is determined with LS method. Finally decision is made using PROMETHEE algorithm based on the attribute matrix and weight vector. The simulation results have shown that the SHS-PROMETHEE algorithm can reduce unnecessary handoffs and provide satisfactory vertical handoff performance.

Keywords

Heterogeneous wireless networks Vertical handoff WLAN WCDMA 

References

  1. 1.
    Shafiee, K., Attar, A., & Leung, V. (2011). Optimal distributed vertical handoff strategies in vehicular heterogeneous networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 29(3), 534–544. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang, W. (2004). Handover decision using fuzzy MADM in heterogeneous networks. In Proc. of IEEE WCND’04, Atlanta, GA March 2004 (pp. 653–658). Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim, T., & Han, S.-w. (2010). A QoS-aware vertical handoff algorithm based on service history information. IEEE Communications Letters, 14(6), 527–529. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yang, K., Gondal, B., Qiu, B., & Dooley, L. S. (2007). Combined SINR based vertical handoff algorithm for next generation heterogeneous wireless networks. In Proc. Globecom, Washington DC (pp. 4483–4487). Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang, K., Gondal, K., & Qiu, B. (2008). Multi-dimensional adaptive SINR based vertical handoff for heterogeneous wireless networks. IEEE Communications Letters, 12(6), 438–440. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yolken, B., & Bambos, N. (2011). Game based capacity allocation for utility computing environments. Telecommunications Systems, 47(1–2), 165–181. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chu, A., & Kalaba, R. K. S. A. (1979). A comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 27(4), 531–538. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chorti, A., & Brookes, M. (2011). Performance analysis of OFDM and DAB receivers in the presence of spurious tones. Telecommunications Systems, 46(2), 181–190. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph., & Mareschal, B. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: the Promethee method. European Journal of Operational Research, 24(2), 228–238. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Telecommunications and Information EngineeringNanjing University of Posts and TelecommunicationsNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations