Skip to main content
Log in

Implementation of SOPC based Telecom & Datacom for monitoring wireless sensor networks

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we used SOPC to develop WSN Control Center to be monitored by Telecom and Datacom. We design the Wireless/Wired Board to receive sensing data from wireless sensor network and through DM9000A Ethernet to provide network monitor over Internet. Especially, WSN Control Center use GSM/GPRS modem to do the emergency reports by Telecom. In the software Design, we programming and immigrating of uClinux Kernel 2.6 OS and the developing of CC1100 WSN application, the system can control and transmit sensing data in the wireless sensor network. This module can be established in communication protocol of the wireless temperature sensors. The data is interpreted by the uClinux OS will appear on the screen and Seven-segment Display; moreover, this system can be applied to the output seven segment LED, and through the connection of Ethernet. Our architecture provides a high degree of scalability and flexibility. It can connect to the Internet, so as to collect the sensor data in the SOPC embedded system, and it can be accessed at anywhere in the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Culler, D., Estrin, D., & Srivastava, M. (2004). Overview of sensor networks. Computer, 37, 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. DE2 Board, http://www.terasic.com.tw.

  3. Cisco Systems (2004). Network management systems organization, 2000. In Stallings, W. (ed.) Wireless communications and networks (pp. 45–50). ISBN-10: 0131918354.

  4. Song, H., King, D., Lee, K., & Sung, J. (2005). Sensor network management architecture. In Proceedings of the second international conference on mobile computing and ubiquitous networking (pp. 85–92).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, W. L., Datta, A., & Cardell-Oliver, R. (2006). WinMS: wireless sensor. Technical report, UWA- CSSE-06-001.

  6. Ramanathan, N., Chang, K., Kapur, R., & Gir Kohler, L. (2005). In Sympathy for the sensor network centre for embedded network sensing (p. 98).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Madden, S., Hellerstein, J., & Hong, W. (2003). In-network query processing in TinyOS. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 30, 122–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xiong, Z.-g., & Zhang, X.-m. (2010). Wireless monitoring system design based on embedded ucLinux system. In The 2nd international conference on computer and automation engineering (ICCAE), 2010 (pp. 579–582).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Tynan, R., Marsh, D., & O’Ka, D. (2005). Intelligent agents for wireless sensor networks. In AAMAS (pp. 1179–1180).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, T. H., & Hong, S. (2008). Sensor network management protocol for state-driven execution environment. GEORGOULAS ET AL. 267 e 3rd on Architectural Support for Programming Lan-2005. In Paper Award, Proceedings of the 5th sensing vineyards

  11. Wan, J., Eisenman, S., Campbell, A., & Crowcroft, J. (2005). Siphon: overload traffic management using multi-radio virtual sinks in sensor networks. In Proceedings of 3rd international conference on embedded networked sensor systems (pp. 116–129).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Levis, P., & Culler, D. (2002). Mate: a tiny virtual machine for sensor networks. In Proceedings of the international conference guages and operating systems, San Jose, CA, USA (pp. 100–111).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fok, C. L., & Roman, G. C. (2009) Agilla: a mobile agent middleware for sensor networks: an application case study. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on information processing in sensor networks, pp. 382–387.

  14. Eduardo, S., Germano, G., & Glauco, V. (2004). A message-oriented middleware for sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on middleware for pervatsive and ad-hoc computing (pp. 127–134).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Georgoulas, D., & Blow, K. (2006). In-Motes: an intelligent agent based middleware for wireless sensor networks. In Best student WSEAS international conference SEPADS 06 (pp. 225–231).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Welsh, M. et al. (2008). Wireless medical sensor networks in emergency response: implementation and pilot results. In IEEE international conference on technologies for Homeland Security

    Google Scholar 

  17. Georgoulas, D., & Blow, K. (2006). Making motes intelligent: an agent based approach to wireless sensor networks. In WSEAS on Communications Journal (pp. 515–522).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Georgoulas, D., & Blow, K. (2007). In-motes bins: a real time application for environmental monitoring in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE/IFIP international conference on mobile and wireless communications networks (pp. 21–26).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hart, J. K., & Martinez, K. (2006). Environmental sensor networks: a revolution in the earth system science. Earth-Science Reviews, 78, 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim, M., Lee, Y. J., & Ryou, J. (2007). How to share heterogeneous sensor networks in ubiquitous environment. In International conference on wireless communications, networking and mobile computing (WiCom 2007), 21–25 Sept. 2007 (pp. 2799–2802).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Porter, J., Arzberger, P. et al. (2005). Wireless sensor networks for ecology. BioScience, 55(7), 561–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Di, L. (2006). The Open GIS Web service specifications for interoperable access and services of NASA EOS data. In Earth science satellite remote sensing (pp. 254–268). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ahn, S., & Chong, K. (2006). Building a bridge for heterogeneous sensor networks. In The 2006 second international workshop on collaborative computing, integration, and assurance (SEUS 2006/WCCIA) (p. 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mainwaring, A., Polastre, J. et al. (2002). Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring. In 1st ACM international workshop on wireless sensor networks and applications, Sept. 28, 2002, (p. 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tak, S.-W., Lim, S.-Y., & Park, C.-S. (1997). Design and implementation of internetworking system between ATM and PSTN. Information, Communications and Signal Processing, 2, 776–780.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cardell-Oliver, R., Smettern, K., Kranz, M., & Mayer, K. (2004). Field testing a wireless sensor network for reactive environmental monitoring. In Intl. conference on intelligent sensors, sensor networks and information processing, Dec. 14–17, 2004, (p. 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tham, C. K., & Buyya, R. (2005). SensorGrid: integrating sensor networks and grid computing. CSI Communications, July, 2005, pp. 24–29.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Han-Chiang Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, HC., Huang, YM., Su, CH. et al. Implementation of SOPC based Telecom & Datacom for monitoring wireless sensor networks. Telecommun Syst 52, 2325–2333 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-011-9546-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-011-9546-9

Keywords

Navigation