Abstract
Today’s IP networks must be able to serve many applications with different needs and goals and the traditional best effort approach is not sufficient to provide the various degrees of Quality of Service (QoS) required by these heterogeneous applications. In previous work, we have proposed a user-centric QoS management scheme within a game theoretic framework. In this paper, our goal is to model user behavior and to study the relationship between network performance, user satisfaction and choice of service class. Our results show that our user behavior model is realistic in the context of a user-controlled QoS: users can obtain a satisfactory service by choosing their service classes themselves. Their satisfaction is higher when they can choose their service classes dynamically rather than with a static allocation. The model also points out the importance of user actions on network stability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altmann, J., Rupp, B., & Varaiya, P. (1999). The case for quality of service on demand—empirical evidence from the INDEX project. In Proceedings of ISQE’99, workshop on internet service quality economics, December 1999.
Blake, S., Black, D., Carlson, M., Davies, E., Wang, Z., & Weiss, W. (1998). An architecture for differentiated service (RFC 2475). IETF, December 1998.
Braden, R., Clark, D., & Shenker, S. (1994). Integrated services in the Internet architecture: an overview (RFC 1633). IETF, June 1994.
Courcoubetis, C., & Weber, R. (2003). Pricing communication networks: economics, technology and modelling. New York: Wiley.
Dadjo, L. (2004). Modèle de gestion de la qualité de service orienté usager dans les réseaux IP multi-services. PhD dissertation, INRS-EMT.
End-user multimedia QoS categories. (November 2001). ITU-T recommendation G. 1010.
General characteristics of international telephone connections and international telephone circuits. (1998). ITU-T recommendation G. 114.
Gibbens, R., & Kelly, F. (1999). Resource pricing and the evolution of congestion control. Automatica, 35, 1969–1985.
Kelly, F. P. (1997). Charging and rate control for elastic traffic. European Transactions on Communications, 8, 33–37.
Kelly, F., Maulloo, A., & Tan, D. (1998). Rate control in communication networks: shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49, 237–252.
Mahajan, V., Muller, E., & Bass, F. M. (1990). New product diffusion models in marketing: a review and directions for research. Journal of Marketing, 54, 1–26.
Nash, J. F. (1950). Equilibrium points in N-person games. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 36, 48–49.
NS-2. The network simulator. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/.
Odlyzko, A. (1999). Paris metro pricing for the Internet. In ACM conference on electronic commerce (pp. 140–147).
Orda, A., & Shimkin, N. (1997). Incentive pricing in multi-class communication networks. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM.
Richards, A., Rogers, G., Witana, V., & Antoniades, M. (1998). Mapping user level QoS from a single parameter. In Second IFIP/IEEE international conference on management of multimedia networks and services, November 1998.
Rosen, E., Viswanathan, A., & Callon, R. (2001). Multiprotocol label switching architecture. RFC 3031, IETF.
Stiller, B., Braun, T., Gunter, M., & Plattner, B. (1999). The CATI project: charging and accounting technology for the Internet. In European conference on multimedia applications, services, and techniques (pp. 281–296), May 1999.
Terms and definitions related to quality of service and network performance including dependability. (1994). ITU-T recommendation E. 800.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dadjo, L., Girard, A. & Grégoire, JC. A model of user behavior in multi-service priced networks. Telecommun Syst 35, 43–53 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-007-9038-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-007-9038-0